한국   대만   중국   일본 
使用者:Turror/演習場2 - 위키百科, 우리 모두의 百科事典 本文으로 移動

使用者 : Turror/演習場2

위키百科, 우리 모두의 百科事典.

위키프로젝트 ( 英語 : WikiProject , 英語 : Wikiproject )는 특정한 編輯 目標를 達成하기 위해, 또 특정한 知識 分野와 關聯된 目標를 達成하기 위한 위키 의 參與者 團體 組織이다. [1] [2] [3] 위키프로젝트는 가장 큰 規模의 위키人 위키百科 에서 一般化되어 있으며 위키事前 , 위키認容집 , 위키文獻 等의 姊妹 프로젝트에서도 어느 程度 存在한다. 또 다른 言語판에도 存在하며 文書를 飜譯하는 것은 그들이 協業하는 形態의 一種이다. 오픈스트리트맵 과 같이 關聯 없는 위키 또한 같은 用語를 使用했다. [4] 코로나19 汎流行 期間 동안 CBS 뉴스 는 疾病과 關聯된 文書의 正確性을 維持하는 데 있어서 위키百科의 위키프로젝트 醫學의 役割에 注目했다. [5] 이 말고도 注目받은 위키프로젝트는 위키프로젝트 女性科學者가 있다. 이는 女性科學者에 對한 文書의 量과 質을 向上시키기 위한 努力의 一環으로 스미소니언 매거진 에 依해 프로파일링되었는데, 이 프로파일에서 "위키프로젝트 女性科學者가 위키百科에 登載된 女性科學者 數를 約 1,600名에서 5,000名 以上으로 늘렸다."라고 言及했다. [6]

위키百科에서 [ 編輯 ]

Some Wikipedia WikiProjects are substantial enough to engage in cooperative activities with outside organizations relevant to the field at issue. For example, in 2014 the Cochrane Collaboration announced that it had entered into a partnership with Wikipedia's WikiProject Medicine , "to support sharing relevant Cochrane Evidence in Wikipedia’s health articles and to develop strategies to keep Wikipedia’s health-related content up to date, unbiased, and of high quality." [7]

Wikipedia has thousands of WikiProjects, primarily divided between specific topical areas and performing specific maintenance tasks. [1] [3] One task commonly performed by topical WikiProjects in Wikipedia is the assessment of the quality of articles that fall within that topic area. [8] In Wikipedia and sister projects, WikiProject pages are located in project space, [1] and the meta information regarding the association between the article and the WikiProject is usually included on the talk page of the article. [8] WikiProjects provide an additional avenue for engagement between editors with similar interests, and have thereby been found to increase the productivity of such editors. [2] In order to spur participation and concentrate effectiveness, WikiProjects in Wikipedia may engage in activities like having a "collaboration of the week", [9] or designating one article to be improved to the point of achieving "featured" status. [10] The WikiProject Council is a group of editors that assists with the development of active WikiProjects , and acts as a central point for inter-WikiProject discussion and collaboration.

A 2008 academic study of Wikipedia concluded that participation in WikiProjects substantially improved the chances of an editor becoming an administrator, finding that one Wikipedia policy edit or WikiProject edit is worth ten article edits, [11] and concluding:

Merely performing a lot of production work is insufficient for "promotion" in Wikipedia. Candidates’ article edits were weak predictors of success. They also have to demonstrate more managerial behavior. Diverse experience and contributions to the development of policies and WikiProjects were stronger predictors of RfA success. This is consistent with the findings that Wikipedia is a bureaucracy [12] and that coordination work has increased substantially. [13] [14] [...] Participation in Wikipedia policy and WikiProjects was not predictive of adminship prior to 2006, suggesting the community as a whole is beginning to prioritize policymaking and organization experience over simple article-level coordination.

위키프로젝트와 文書의 質 및 重要度 評價 [ 編輯 ]

The English Wikipedia currently has over 2,000 WikiProjects, with varying degrees of activity. [15] [16]

In 2007 the English Wikipedia introduced an assessment scale of the quality of articles. [17] Articles are rated by WikiProjects. The range of quality classes begins with "Stub" (very short pages), followed by "Start", "C" and "B" (in increasing order of quality). Community peer review is needed for the article to enter one of the highest quality classes: either "A", "good article" or the highest, "featured article". Of the about 4.4 million articles and lists assessed as of March 2015, about 7000 (0.16%) are a featured article or a featured list. One featured article per day, as selected by editors, appears on the main page of Wikipedia. [18] [19]

The articles can also be rated for importance by WikiProjects. Currently, [ 언제? ] there are 5 importance categories: "low", "mid", "high", "top", and "???" for unclassified/unsure level. For a particular article, different WikiProjects may assign different importance levels.

The Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team has developed a table (shown below) that displays data of all rated articles by quality and importance, on the English Wikipedia. If an article or list receives different ratings by two or more WikiProjects, then the highest rating is used in the table and bar-chart.

Researcher Giacomo Poderi found that articles tend to reach featured status via the intensive work of a few editors. [20] A 2010 study found unevenness in quality among featured articles and concluded that the community process is ineffective in assessing the quality of articles. [21]

使用者:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/OverallArticles 모듈:Chart 220番째 줄에서 Lua 誤謬: attempt to get length of field '?' (a nil value).

WikiProject Medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic [ 編輯 ]

CBS News described the role of Wikipedia's WikiProject Medicine in making Wikipedia a source of medical information relating to the COVID-19 pandemic , noting that a project member "edits and reviews all the medical content on Wikipedia", but also providing the caveat that "even though medical pages are strictly monitored by the WikiProject team, and hot topics that get a lot of page views are carefully edited, inaccurate information persists on some of Wikipedia's less-read pages". [5]

References [ 編輯 ]

  1. Phoebe Ayers, Charles Matthews, Ben Yates, How Wikipedia Works: And how You Can be a Part of it (2008), p. 213.
  2. Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, Building Successful Online Communities (2012), p. 207, "WikiProjects are groups of editors who work together on articles within a domain, like military history, sports, or medicine".
  3. Broughton, John (2008). 《 Wikipedia ? The Missing Manual 》. O'Reilly Media . 165?175쪽.   認容 誤謬: 잘못된 <ref> 태그; "Broughton"李 다른 콘텐츠로 여러 番 定義되었습니다
  4. “Mapping projects” . 《OpenStreetMap》 . 2020年 5月 26日에 確認함 .  
  5. Laudato, Anthony (2020年 5月 24日). “The rise of Wikipedia as a source of medical information” . CBS News .  
  6. Daley, Jason (2016年 3月 15日). “How a College Student Led the WikiProject Women Scientists” . Smithsonian Magazine .  
  7. “Improving the quality of Wikipedia articles using Cochrane evidence” . 《 Cochrane 》 (英語) . 2019年 11月 19日에 確認함 .  
  8. Huijing Deng, Bernadetta Tarigan, Mihai Grigore, Juliana Sutanto, "Understanding the ‘Quality Motion’ of Wikipedia Articles Through Semantic Convergence Analysis", HCI in Business: Lecture Notes in Computer Science , Vol. 9191 (July 21, 2015), p. 64-75.
  9. Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, Building Successful Online Communities (2012), p. 38, "WikiProjects are groups of editors who work together on articles within a domain, like military history, sports, or medicine".
  10. Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, Building Successful Online Communities (2012), p. 85, "WikiProjects are groups of editors who work together on articles within a domain, like military history, sports, or medicine".
  11. Burke, Moira; Kraut, Robert (2008). 〈Taking up the mop〉. 《Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '08》. 3441쪽. doi : 10.1145/1358628.1358871 . ISBN   978-1-60558-012-8 . S2CID   5868576 .  
  12. Butler, Brian; Joyce, Elisabeth; Pike, Jacqueline (2008). 〈Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy〉. 《Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '08》. 1101쪽. doi : 10.1145/1357054.1357227 . ISBN   9781605580111 . S2CID   15211227 .  
  13. Kittur, Aniket; Suh, Bongwon; Pendleton, Bryan A.; and Chi, Ed H. (2007). 〈He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia〉. 《Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing》. Association for Computing Machinery. 453?462쪽. doi : 10.1145/1240624.1240698 . ISBN   978-1-59593-593-9 . S2CID   17493296 .  
  14. Viegas, Fernanda B.; Wattenberg, Martin; Kriss, Jesse; van Ham, Frank (2007). “Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia”. 《40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences》: 575?582. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.210.1057 . doi : 10.1109/HICSS.2007.511 . ISBN   978-0-7695-2755-0 . S2CID   5293547 .  
  15. Wikipedia:Wikiprojects  
  16. Wikipedia:Database reports/WikiProjects by changes
  17. Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment  
  18. “Comparing featured article groups and revision patterns correlations in Wikipedia” . First Monday . 2010年 7月 13日에 確認함 .  
  19. Fernanda B. Viegas; Martin Wattenberg; Matthew M. McKeon (2007年 7月 22日). “The Hidden Order of Wikipedia” (PDF) . Visual Communication Lab, IBM Research . 2007年 10月 30日에 確認함 .  
  20. Poderi, Giacomo, Wikipedia and the Featured Articles: How a Technological System Can Produce Best Quality Articles , Master thesis, University of Maastricht , October 2008.
  21. Lindsey, David (2010年 4月 5日). “Evaluating quality control of Wikipedia's featured articles” . 《First Monday》 15 (4) . 2017年 1月 29日에 確認함 .  

틀:Wikipedia