Functions or implementations or tests who do not work properly or meet notability criteria can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions under the "Requests for deletion" section below.
If it is obvious vandalism, just report it in
Wikifunctions:Report vandalism
, or ping an
administrator
. Contact can also be made with an administrator on
Telegram
or IRC
#wikipedia-abstract
.
Related to the same natural language. --
Wolverene
(
talk
)
08:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply
- P.S. I am also not sure it is a good idea to distinguish between
Southern Min language
and Standard Chinese spoken in the
Minnan region
, it was hardly assumed by those who assigned the codes. --
Wolverene
(
talk
)
08:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply
- Ping
@
Quiddity (WMF)
:
since you have been able to help with
a similar request
. --
Ameisenigel
(
talk
)
15:44, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply
- Thanks. I've added a note to
phab:T348370
about this. Please postpone the deletion here, for now.
Quiddity (WMF)
(
talk
)
20:03, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply
- The BCP 47 language tag
zh-min-nan
always mean the "Minnan language".
- It NEVER means "Standard Chinese spoken in the Minnan region".
- It's deprecated in favor of
nan
.
- CC @
Wolverene
, @
Quiddity (WMF)
. --
Winston Sung
(
talk
)
08:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply
- https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/repos/abstract-wiki/wikifunctions/function-schemata/-/merge_requests/97
have been merged.
- Please apply updates from the GitLab merge request to Wikifunctions.
- Z1221 zh-min-nan == merge => nan
- Z1501 zh-min-nan ZObject => nan-latn-pehoeji
- Z1922 New ZObject => nan-latn-tailo
- --
Winston Sung
(
talk
)
02:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply
No idea why we would need this string as a ZID. --
Ameisenigel
(
talk
)
13:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply
- See
Special:Search/Z11488
.--
GZWDer
(
talk
)
16:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply
- That just redirects me to Z11488. --
Ameisenigel
(
talk
)
19:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply
- Try
Special:Search//"Z11488"
. It looks like deleting this object would break two test cases.
GrounderUK
(
talk
)
07:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply
- Interesting, why does this not show up at
[1]
? --
Ameisenigel
(
talk
)
17:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply
- I think that’s
phab:T361701
.
GrounderUK
(
talk
)
04:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply
- Shouldn't it be possible to have this tests without the ZID by using the string directly? --
Ameisenigel
(
talk
)
18:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply
- That should always be possible, yes. We don’t have many
Z6 objects
and these few should all provide a justification, in my opinion. I don’t have a view on what should be considered adequate justification, however.
GrounderUK
(
talk
)
05:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply
No idea why we would need this string as a ZID. --
Ameisenigel
(
talk
)
13:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply
