Gilles Deleuze

Bach khoa toan th? m? Wikipedia
Gilles Deleuze
Sinh 18 thang 1 n?m 1925
Paris , đ? Tam C?ng hoa Phap
M?t 4 thang 11 n?m 1995 (1995-11-04) (70 tu?i)
Paris, Phap
Qu?c t?ch Phap
Tr??ng l?p đ?i h?c Paris
( B.A. ; M.A. , 1947; DrE , 1968)
Th?i k? Tri?t h?c th? k? 20
Vung Tri?t h?c ph??ng Tay
Tr??ng phai
T? ch?c đ?i h?c Paris VIII
đ?i t??ng chinh
?nh h??ng b?i
?nh h??ng t?i

Gilles Deleuze ( ti?ng Phap:  [?il d?løz] ; 18 thang 1 n?m 1925 - 4 thang 11 n?m 1995) la m?t tri?t gia ng??i Phap, t? nh?ng n?m 1960 cho đ?n khi qua đ?i, đa vi?t v? tri?t h?c , v?n h?c , đi?n ?nh va m? thu?t . Tac ph?m ph? bi?n nh?t c?a ong la hai t?p c?a Capitalism and Schizophrenia : Anti-Oedipus (1972) va A Thousand Plateaus (1980), c? hai la đ?ng tac gi? v?i nha phan tam h?c Felix Guattari .

Lu?n an sieu hinh Difference and Repetition (1968) c?a ong đ??c nhi?u h?c gi? coi la tac ph?m v? đ?i c?a ong. [1] A. W. Moore, khi nh?c đ?n tieu chu?n c?a Bernard Williams v? m?t nha t? t??ng l?n, đa x?p h?ng Deleuze trong s? nh?ng "nha tri?t h?c v? đ?i nh?t". [14]  Tac ph?m c?a ong đa ?nh h??ng đ?n nhi?u l?nh v?c khac nhau t? tri?t h?c đ?n ngh? thu?t, bao g?m ly lu?n v?n h?c , ch? ngh?a h?u c?u truc va ch? ngh?a h?u hi?n đ?i . [15]

Ti?u s? [ s?a | s?a ma ngu?n ]

đ?u đ?i: 1925?1948 [ s?a | s?a ma ngu?n ]

Gilles Deleuze chao đ?i ngay 18 thang 1 n?m 1925 t?i Qu?n 17 , Paris , Phap, trong m?t gia đinh trung l?u b?o th?. [16] [17] Cha ong, Louis Deleuze, t?ng la ch? s? h?u m?t cong ty l?p mai ch?ng th?m nh? nh?ng s?t nghi?p vao n?m 1930, sau đi lam thue cho m?t cong x??ng s?n xu?t than may bay. Louis va v?, ba Odette Camuet, co t? t??ng chinh tr? thien h?u, khong ?a t?ng l?p lao đ?ng, trai ng??c v?i đ?a con Gilles c?a h?. [16] Gilles co m?t ng??i anh ru?t, Georges Deleuze, b? b?t gi? vi ho?t đ?ng khang chi?n ch?ng đ?c trong Th? chi?n II , v? sau b? m?ng tren chuy?n tau t?i tr?i t?p trung Auschwitz . [18] [17] Nha ti?u s? h?c Francois Dosse cho r?ng cai ch?t c?a Georges đa ?nh h??ng r?t l?n t?i s? hinh thanh tinh cach c?a Gilles. [18]

N?m 15 tu?i, cha m? Deleuze g?i ong vao m?t ngoi tr??ng n?i tru ? Brittany đ? lanh chi?n tranh. T?i đay, ong phat tri?n ni?m yeu thich tri?t h?c. Sau khi Phap đ?u hang đ?c vao n?m 1940, Deleuze tr? v? Paris b? chi?m đong va h?c ? tr??ng Lycee Carnot . [19]

Tri?t h?c [ s?a | s?a ma ngu?n ]

Cong trinh L?ch s? va tri?t h?c [ s?a | s?a ma ngu?n ]

Hume va Kant [ s?a | s?a ma ngu?n ]

Trong cu?n sach đ?u tay v?i nhan đ? Thuy?t duy nghi?m va tinh ch? quan , Deleuze đa đ?a ra m?t l?i bi?n gi?i pha cach v? tri?t h?c duy nghi?m c?a David Hume , đ?ng th?i nh?n m?nh v?n đ? ngu?n g?c c?a tinh ch? quan . [20] Theo Phillip Goodchild, ? đay Deleuze đa v?n d?ng Hume nh?m bi?t ly tri?t h?c c?a minh kh?i ba dong t? t??ng chi ph?i tri?t h?c l?c đ?a , đo la: s? quan bi?n ch?ng Hegel , hi?n t??ng h?c Husserl va b?n th? h?c c? y?u Heidegger . [21] [22]

Tham kh?o [ s?a | s?a ma ngu?n ]

  1. ^ a b “Gilles Deleuze” . Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . Truy c?p ngay 17 thang 2 n?m 2011 .
  2. ^ Toscano, Alberto (thang 1 n?m 2005). “The Politics of Spinozism: Composition and Communication (Paper presented at the Cultural Research Bureau of Iran, Tehran, 4 January 2005)” (PDF) . Truy c?p ngay 20 thang 6 n?m 2019 . Alberto Toscano (2005): "Though Spinozists have existed ever since the radical circles that rippled through Europe in the wake of Spinoza's death, I think it is fair to say that only in the past 50 years or so has there been a Spinozism to match in hermeneutic rigour and creative interventions the history of Kantianism or Hegelianism, that only now has the hereticism that Althusser referred to been complemented by the labour of the concept. Arguably, it is only now then that the scope of his thought and its relevance to our social and political existence can be truly appreciated, at a historical juncture when the communicative power of the multitude and of what Marx called the general intellect is so intensified that the physics, ethics, ontology and politics of Spinoza (what are ultimately indissociable facets of his philosophizing) can be thought simultaneously."
  3. ^ Vinciguerra, Lorenzo (2009), 'Spinoza in French Philosophy Today,'. Philosophy Today 53(4): 422?437. doi : 10.5840/philtoday200953410
  4. ^ Peden, Knox: Reason without Limits: Spinozism as Anti-Phenomenology in Twentieth-Century French Thought . (lu?n v?n Ph.D., đ?i h?c California, Berkeley , 2009)
  5. ^ Peden, Knox: Spinoza Contra Phenomenology: French Rationalism from Cavailles to Deleuze . ( Stanford University Press , 2014) ISBN 9780804791342
  6. ^ Duffy, Simon B. (2014), 'French and Italian Spinozism,'. Trong: Rosi Braidotti (ch? bien), After Poststructuralism: Transitions and Transformations . (London: Routledge, 2014), tr. 148?168
  7. ^ Simon Choat, Marx Through Post-Structuralism: Lyotard, Derrida, Foucault, Deleuze , Continuum, 2010, ch. 5.
  8. ^ Michael A. Peters, Poststructuralism, Marxism, and Neoliberalism: Between Theory and Politics , Rowman & Littlefield, 2001, tr. 103.
  9. ^ Gilles Deleuze, Cinema 1: The Movement-Image , Continuum, 2001, p. 69.
  10. ^ Giorgio Agamben , The Open: Man and Animal , trans. Kevin Attell (Stanford University Press, 2004), tr. 39.
  11. ^ Gilles Deleuze va Claire Parnet, Dialogues II , Columbia University Press, 2007, tr. 57?8, d?ch sang ti?ng Anh b?i Hugh Tomlinson va Barbara Habberjam: "Apart from Sartre, the most important philosopher in France was Jean Wahl." Deleuze goes on to credit Wahl for introducing him to English and American thought. Wahl was among the first to write about Alfred North Whitehead and William James ?both arguably very important to Deleuze?in French. The idea of Anglo-American pluralism in Deleuze's work shows influence of Jean Wahl (see also Mary Frances Zamberlin, Rhizosphere (New York: Routledge, 2006, tr. 47) va Simone Bignall, Sean Bowden, Paul Patton (bien t?p), Deleuze and Pragmatism , Routledge, 2014, tr. 2).
  12. ^ Gilles Deleuze va Claire Parnet, Dialogues II , Columbia University Press, 2007, tr. vii.
  13. ^ “Interview With Bruno Latour” . 24 thang 9 n?m 2013 . Truy c?p ngay 21 thang 11 n?m 2019 .
  14. ^ A. W. Moore , The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things , Cambridge University Press, 2012, p. 543: 'intellectual power and depth; a grasp of the sciences; a sense of the political, and of human destructiveness as well as creativity; a broad range and a fertile imagination; an unwillingness to settle for the superficially reassuring; and, in an unusually lucky case, the gifts of a great writer.'
  15. ^ See, for example, Steven Best and Douglas Kellner , Postmodern Theory (Guilford Press, 1991), which devotes a chapter to Deleuze and Guattari.
  16. ^ a b Dosse 2011 , tr. 89.
  17. ^ a b SEP 2022 .
  18. ^ a b Dosse 2011 , tr. 88.
  19. ^ Dosse 2011 , tr. 90.
  20. ^ Roffe 2009 , tr. 68-69.
  21. ^ Goodchild 1996 , tr. 13.
  22. ^ Marks 1998 , tr. 53.

Th? m?c [ s?a | s?a ma ngu?n ]

  • “Gilles Deleuze” . Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . Ngay 3 thang 6 n?m 2022 . Truy c?p ngay 17 thang 2 n?m 2011 .
  • Dosse, Francois (2011). Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari: Intersecting Lives [ Gilles Deleuze va Felix Guattari: Nh?ng cu?c đ?i trung phung ] (b?ng ti?ng Anh). Deborah Glassman bien d?ch. New York: Nha xu?t b?n đ?i h?c Columbia. ISBN   9780231145619 .
  • Goodchild, Phillip (1996). Deleuze and Guattari: An Introduction to the Politics of Desire [ Deleuze va Guattari: M?t d?n nh?p vao chinh tr? c?a ham mu?n ] (b?ng ti?ng Anh). Anh: SAGE Publications. ISBN   9781848609679 .
  • Marks, John (1998). Gilles Deleuze: Vitalism and Multiplicity [ Gilles Deleuze: Sinh l?c lu?n va đa nguyen tinh ] (b?ng ti?ng Anh). Anh: Pluto Press. ISBN   9780745308746 .
  • Roffe, Jon (2009). “David Hume”. Trong Jones, Graham; Roffe, Jon (bien t?p). Deleuze's Philosophical Lineage [ Dong doi tri?t h?c c?a Deleuze ] (b?ng ti?ng Anh). Anh: Nha xu?t b?n đ?i h?c Edinburg. ISBN   9780748631957 .

Lien k?t ngoai [ s?a | s?a ma ngu?n ]

L?y t? “ https://vi.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gilles_Deleuze&oldid=71026522 ”