How to Be a Conservative

How to Be a Conservative
	How to Be a Conservative
Forfattare	Roger Scruton
Originalsprak	engelska
Land	Storbritannien
Forlag for forstautgavan	Bloomsbury continuum
Utgivningsar	11 september 2014

How to Be a Conservative ar en bok fran 2014 av den engelske filosofen Roger Scruton . Scruton ger en oversikt over den konservativa ideologin, dess motstand mot materialism , och argumenterar for hur den kan tillampas pa avgorande fragor i samtiden.

Svensk version av boken [ redigera | redigera wikitext ]

Att vara konservativ ( How to Be a Conservative ) (Arktos, 2016, ISBN 978-1-910524-78-7 (Inbunden) ISBN 978-1-910524-77-0 (Haftad))

Mottagande [ redigera | redigera wikitext ]

Jesse Norman skrev i The Spectator : "Det finns tillfalliga snedsteg och enstaka mini-oreranden, men boken ar hogst engagerande, och fullproppad med insikter inom amnen sa skilda som internationella fordrag, alienering och skrattets natur." ^[
1
] I Standpoint skrev David Willetts att boken "formedlar ett utpraglat konservativt lynne med stor charm och formidabel bildning". ^[
2
] Willetts skrev att Scruton

ar valdigt bra vad galler vikten av sjalvstandiga institutioner ? vad jag har kallat medborgarkonservatism [civic conservatism]. Men han ar forvanansvart ointresserad av varifran denna stora tradition kommer eller hur den har forandrats over tid. Han verkar betrakta den som en lycklig och mahanda ratt sa oavsiktlig gava fran historien. Detta innebar att hans framstallning av de konservativas roll ar tamligen passiv och likgiltig. ^[
2
]

Kallor [ redigera | redigera wikitext ]

^ Norman, Jesse (27 september 2014). ”Passion, authority and the odd mini-rant: Scruton's conservative vision” (pa engelska). The Spectator . http://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/09/how-to-be-a-conservative-by-roger-scruton-book-review/ . Last 27 maj 2016 . ”There are occasional missteps and the odd mini-rant, but the book is highly engaging, and studded with insights into topics as diverse as international treaties, alienation and the nature of laughter.”
^ [ a b ] Willetts, David (1 november 2014). ”Squire Scruton and the Tory disposition” (pa engelska). Standpoint . Arkiverad fran originalet den 20 januari 2021 . https://web.archive.org/web/20210120032117/https://standpointmag.co.uk/books-squire-roger-scruton-and-tory-disposition-david-willetts/ . Last 27 maj 2016 . ”communicates a distinctive conservative disposition with great charm and formidable learning." "is very good on the importance of autonomous institutions ? what I called civic conservatism. But he is surprisingly uninterested in where this great tradition comes from or how it has changed over time. He appears to regard it as a happy and perhaps rather accidental gift from history. This means that his account of the role of Conservatives is rather passive and incurious.”

Externa lankar [ redigera | redigera wikitext ]

Bokens presentation hos det brittiska forlaget (engelska)

[1] Norman, Jesse (27 september 2014). ”Passion, authority and the odd mini-rant: Scruton's conservative vision” (pa engelska). The Spectator . http://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/09/how-to-be-a-conservative-by-roger-scruton-book-review/ . Last 27 maj 2016 . ”There are occasional missteps and the odd mini-rant, but the book is highly engaging, and studded with insights into topics as diverse as international treaties, alienation and the nature of laughter.”

[standpoint-2] [ a b ] Willetts, David (1 november 2014). ”Squire Scruton and the Tory disposition” (pa engelska). Standpoint . Arkiverad fran originalet den 20 januari 2021 . https://web.archive.org/web/20210120032117/https://standpointmag.co.uk/books-squire-roger-scruton-and-tory-disposition-david-willetts/ . Last 27 maj 2016 . ”communicates a distinctive conservative disposition with great charm and formidable learning." "is very good on the importance of autonomous institutions ? what I called civic conservatism. But he is surprisingly uninterested in where this great tradition comes from or how it has changed over time. He appears to regard it as a happy and perhaps rather accidental gift from history. This means that his account of the role of Conservatives is rather passive and incurious.”

[ 1 ]

[ 2 ]