Epistola lui Iuda

Epistola lui Iuda (sau Epistola catolic? a lui Iuda ), de obicei, denumit? simplu Iuda , este penultima carte a Noului Testament ?i este atribuit? in mod tradi?ional lui Iuda Tadeul , fratele lui Iacov cel Drept (Iuda Tadeul este uneori identificat cu fratele lui Iisus ). Opinia critic? majoritar? este c? a fost scris? sub nume fals. ^[1]

Scrisoarea lui Iuda a fost unul dintre c?r?ile contestate de canonul biblic . De?i statutul s?u canonic a fost atacat, autenticitatea acestei lucr?ri nu a fost niciodat? pus? la indoial? de c?tre Biserica timpurie. Asem?n?rile dintre Epistola lui Iuda ?i 2 Petru , utilizarea de c?tre ea a c?r?ilor apocrife ^[2] ?i concizia ei au creat ingrijorare.

Opinia critic? majoritar? o consider? o lucrare pseudonim? scris? intre sfar?itul secolului I ?i primul sfert al secolului al II-lea, bazandu-se pe referirile la apostoli , ^[3] tradi?ie, ^[4] st?panirea bun? a limbii grece?ti ?i opozi?ia fa?? de gnosticism , dar cercet?torii conservatori o dateaz? intre anii 66 ?i 90 . ^[5]^[6]^[7]

Epistola lui Iuda face parte din ? Antilegomena lui Luther ”, impreun? cu Evrei , Iacob ?i Apocalipsa lui Ioan . ^[8]^[9]

Note [ modificare | modificare surs? ]

^ en ?6. Forgeries in Conflicts with False Teachers. Forgeries Directed Against Unknown Opponents. Jude.”. Forged: Writing in the Name of God?Why the Bible’s Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are (ed. First Edition. EPub Edition.). New York: HarperCollins e-books. 2011 . p. 208. ISBN 978-0-06-207863-6 . Arhivat din original la 15 februarie 2012 . Accesat in 14 septembrie 2011 . If this Jude is identifying himself as the brother of that James, then he is, by implication, obviously the brother of Jesus.

But it is almost certain that the historical Jude did not write this book.
^ De exemplu Cartea lui Enoh , vezi Martin, Dale. ?RLST 152 - Lecture 24 - Apocalyptic and Accommodation” . Open Yale Courses . Accesat in 19 ianuarie 2020 .
^ Iuda 17-18
^ Iuda 3
^ ?USCCB - NAB - Jude” . Arhivat din original la 8 decembrie 2007 . Accesat in 25 mai 2011 .
^ Norman Perrin, (1974) The New Testament: An Introduction , p. 260
^ Bauckham,RJ (1986), Word Biblical Commentary, Vol.50, Word (UK) Ltd. p.16
^ Lutheran Cyclopedia: Canon : "6. Throughout the Middle Ages there was no doubt as to the divine character of any book of the NT. Luther again pointed to the distinction between homologoumena and antilegomena* (followed by M. Chemnitz* and M. Flacius*). The later dogmaticians let this distinction recede into the background. Instead of antilegomena they use the term deuterocanonical. Rationalists use the word canon in the sense of list. Lutherans in America followed Luther and held that the distinction between homologoumena and antilegomena must not be suppressed. But caution must be exercised not to exaggerate the distinction."
^ Luther's Antilegomena at bible-researcher.com

Leg?turi externe [ modificare | modificare surs? ]

Materiale media legate de Epistola lui Iuda la Wikimedia Commons

Acest articol legat de cre?tinism este un ciot . Pute?i ajuta Wikipedia prin completarea lui !

Acest articol despre Biblie este un ciot . Pute?i ajuta Wikipedia prin completarea lui !

[1] ?6. Forgeries in Conflicts with False Teachers. Forgeries Directed Against Unknown Opponents. Jude.”. Forged: Writing in the Name of God?Why the Bible’s Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are (ed. First Edition. EPub Edition.). New York: HarperCollins e-books. 2011 . p. 208. ISBN 978-0-06-207863-6 . Arhivat din original la 15 februarie 2012 . Accesat in 14 septembrie 2011 . If this Jude is identifying himself as the brother of that James, then he is, by implication, obviously the brother of Jesus.

But it is almost certain that the historical Jude did not write this book.

[Open_Yale_Courses-2] De exemplu Cartea lui Enoh , vezi Martin, Dale. ?RLST 152 - Lecture 24 - Apocalyptic and Accommodation” . Open Yale Courses . Accesat in 19 ianuarie 2020 .

[3] Iuda 17-18

[4] Iuda 3

[NAB-5] ?USCCB - NAB - Jude” . Arhivat din original la 8 decembrie 2007 . Accesat in 25 mai 2011 .

[6] Norman Perrin, (1974) The New Testament: An Introduction , p. 260

[7] Bauckham,RJ (1986), Word Biblical Commentary, Vol.50, Word (UK) Ltd. p.16

[8] Lutheran Cyclopedia: Canon : "6. Throughout the Middle Ages there was no doubt as to the divine character of any book of the NT. Luther again pointed to the distinction between homologoumena and antilegomena* (followed by M. Chemnitz* and M. Flacius*). The later dogmaticians let this distinction recede into the background. Instead of antilegomena they use the term deuterocanonical. Rationalists use the word canon in the sense of list. Lutherans in America followed Luther and held that the distinction between homologoumena and antilegomena must not be suppressed. But caution must be exercised not to exaggerate the distinction."

[9] Luther's Antilegomena at bible-researcher.com

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]