??? ??????? ???????

??? ??????? ? ?? ??? ????? ???????? ????? ??????? ??? ????? ????? ??????? ????????? ??? ??????? ???????? ???? ???????? ???? ????? ^[1] ???? ??????? ????? ???? ??????? ?? ???????? ??????? ??????? ???? ?? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ???????? ????????? ???? ????????? ??????? ???? ??????. ^[2]

????? ??? ??????? ??? ???? ?????? ???????? ????????? ???????? ?????????? ????????? ???????? ??????. ??????? ??????? ?? ??? ????? ?? ??????? ??????? ????? ??????? ?????????? ???????? ???? ???? ?????? ???????. ????? ??????? ??????? ???? ????? ??? ?????? ??????? ????????? ????????? ?? ??? ?? ??????? ???? ??? ???? ??????? ???????? ??? ??? ???????? ??? ???? ?? ???? ?????? ???????. ???? ??????? ??????? ??? ?????? ??? ???? ??????? ???? (??????? ??????)? ????? ????? ???????? ???? ?? ????? ?? ??? ????????? ?????????? ??????? ???????? ?? ?????? ?????? ? ?????? ? ???????? ???????? ??????????? ? ???????????????? ????????????? ? ???? ???????? ??????? ? ???? ?????? ? ????????? ??????? ? ???? ???????? ??????????? ??????? ? ???? ??????? ??????? ???????? ??????? ? ???? ????????? ? ???????? ??????? ??????? ? ?????? ???????? ???????? ????????? ??????? ??????. ??? ???? ??????? ??????? ??? ??????? ??????? ? ?????? ?? ?????? ?? ??? ???????.

???????? ???????? [ ??? ]

????? ??? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??? ?????? ??????? ????????: ??????????? ???????????? ??????????????. ??? ????? ?? ??? ??????? ?????? ???????? ???? ??????? ????????? ???????? ????????.

??? ??????? ??????? [ ??? ]

??????? ??????? ?? ???? ?? ?????? ??????? ???????? ???? ????? ??????? ?? ??????? ?????????? ???????? ???? ???????? ?????????? ????????. ????? ??????? ??????? ??? ?????? ????????? ??????? ?? ??????? ????????? ??????? ?? ????? ???? ???? ??????? ???????? ??? ??? ???????? ????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ??????. ???? ???? ?????? ?? ??????? ???? ???? ????? ????????? ??? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ???????. ?????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ????? ??????? ???????: ^[3]

???? (???? ????????)
???? ????
??????? ???? ?????? ????????? ???????? ???????? ??????
?????
??? ??????? ??????? - ????? ???? ??????? ???????
??? ????? ?? ??? ???????
??????? ???????
??????? ??????? ?? ??????????
???????
???? ????? ???????? ???? ???????
????????????? - ????? ????? ???? ??????
??? ???????? ??????? - ????? ????? ?????
??? ?????? - ????? ??????
???????????? ?? ???????? ???????? - ????? ??????? ????????
??? ?????????? ???????? - ????? ??????? ???????? ????????
????????? ???????
????? ??????? ???????
??? ??????? - ?????? ??????? ???????
??????????
?????????????? ????????
?????? ??????

?????: ?????? ?????? ???? ??? ??????? [ ??? ]

????? ??????? [ ??? ]

????? ?? ????? ?? ???????? ?? ????? ????? ??????? ??? ??????? ??????? ?? ??? ??????? ?? ????. ?? ???? ????? ?? ???? ??????? ?? ??? ????? ??? ??????. ????? ????? ???? ????? ??????? ???? ???????. ??? ????????? ?????? ?? ??????? ??? ??? ????? ?????? ?? ??? ????? ???????. ?? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ???? ???? ?? ??????? ???? ???? ??????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ???????????? ??? ?????? ???????? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ????? ??? ????? ????? ???????.

??? ???? ???????? (1225-1274) ????? ?? ????? ?? ????????: ????? ????? ??????.

???? ????? ????? ??? ?????? ????? ??????? ??????. ????? ?????? ????? ?? ?????? ???????? ??? ????????? ????? ??? ???? ???? ?????? ??? ?????. ???? ????? ????? ????? ??? ????? ??????? ???????.
?? ???? ??????? ??? ????????? ??? ??? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?????? ????????? ??? ???? ???? ???? ?? ?????? ?????? ??????.

??????? ??????? [ ??? ]

????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?? ?????? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ??????? ??? ??? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ?????? ???? ????? ??? ??????? ??? ???????. ????? ??? ???????? ???????? ????? ??????? (????? ???? ??????? ????? ??????? ??? ??????? ????????)? ????? ?????? ????? ?????? ?????? ?? ??????? ??? ????? ???? ??? ??????? ????? ???????? ???????: ≪???? ???? ????≫ (?? ??????? 22 ?24 ?? ??????? 12 ??? ?????? ?????? ???????? 3 ?4 ?? ??????? 7 ?? ??? ????? ?????? ?????? ?????? 13 ?? ??????? 35 ?? ??? ?????? ?????? 4 ?? ??????? 2 ?? ??? ??????? ?????? 9 ?? ??????? 7 ?? ??? ?????). ????? ????? ???? ??????? ≪?? ???? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ???. ???? ?? ??? ???? ?? ?????? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ???? ???????? ?????? ?? ????? ?????≫. ???? ????? ???? ??????? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ??????? ????? (??????? 3 ????? 16). ^[4]

?????? ?????? ?? ????????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?????????? ?? ??? ???????? 2 ??????? 3 ??????? 16 ?17? ????? ?????? ??? ?? ≪?? ?????? ?? ???? ?? ?? ???? ?????…≫ ???? ?????? ???? ??? ??? ????? ??????? ???? ??? ???????? ???? ?????? ??????? ??? ????? ??????? (????? 15). ?????? ????? ???? ???? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ???? ??????? ??. ???. ??? ????? ??? ????? ??????? ???? ??????? ??? ≪??? ?? ?????? ?? ??? ????≫. ???? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ???????? ???????? ?? ?????? ?????? ?????????? ???? ???? ????? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ????????? ??????? ???????. ???????? ????? ????? ???? ?? ???? ????????? ?????????. ?? ???????? ???? ????? ?? ??????? ≪????????≫ ?????? ????? ?????? ??. ????? ?? ??????? ??????? ≪???? ???? ??????≫. ^[5]

????? ??? ????? ?????????? ??????? ?? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ??? ≪?????? ??????≫ (?????? ???????? ???????) ?? ≪?? ???? ????≫ (?????? ????????? ??????????)? ??????? ???? ??? ??????? ??? ?????? ???? ???? ?????? ??? ????? ???????? insp?r?re? ????? ≪???? ?? ????≫. ^[6]

?????? ?????? ?????? [ ??? ]

?? ????????? ???? ?????? ????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ???? ???? ?????? ?????? ????????? ??? ?????? ????? ??? ?? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ?????. ???? ??? ????????? ??????? ?????? ?????? (?? ????? ????? ?? ??????? ??????????? ??? ?? ?????? ????????? ????????)? ????? ????? ????????? ?????? ?????? (?? ???????? ?? ??? ??????? ???????? ?????????? ???? ???????? ?? ???? ?????? ?? ??????? ????? ?????? ????????? ?? ???????). ^[7]^[8]

?????? ??? ????????? ??????? ?? ???? ?????? ?????? ?? ??????? ?? ???? ?????? ??????? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ??? ?????. ???? ??? ?????? ?????? ?? ????? ??????? ????? ??? ????? ?? ???? ??? ?????? ?? ?? ?????. ???? ????? ????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ?? ?????? ?? ??? ????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ?? ?????. ???? ????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ??? ????? ???? ?????? ??????? ??? ??????? ?????? ??? ?????? ???????? ??????? ????? ?????? ?? ???????? ??? ??????? ?????? ?????? ?? ????. ????? ??? ????????? ?? ??????? ?? ???? ??????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ??? ???? ??????? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ??????. ^[9]

?????? ?????? ???????? [ ??? ]

?????? ????? ????? ?????? ???????????? ?? ????? ????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?? ???? ??? ????????? ?? ????? ?????? ???????? ??? ????? ?????? ?????????? ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ??????? ????????? ???????. ????? ??????????????? ?? 39 ????? ?? ?????? ?????? ????????? ?? ??? ????? ????? ????????? ?????????? ???????? ?? 46 ????? ?? ??????? ?????????. ?????? ????????? ???????????????? ??????? ??? 27 ????? ?? ????? ??????.

?????? ????????? ??????? ??????? ?????????? ??? ???? ?????? ???? ?????? ??????? ??? ????????? ??????? ????????. ????? ???????? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???? ??? ??? ????? ??????. ????? ??? ??????? ????? ?? ?????? ?? ????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ????? ??? 393 ??????? ?????? ????? ?? ?????? ???????? ??????? ??? 46 ????????? ?? ????? ??????? ??? ??????? ???? ???????? ???????????? ????? (???????? ??? ??????? ??? 27 ?? ????? ?????? ???? ???????? ???? ?????????). ^[10]

???? ????? [ ??? ]

????? [ ??? ]

^ Entwistle, David N., Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity , p148 ???? ?????? 2020-01-26 ?? Wayback Machine
^ See, e.g., Daniel L. Migliore, Faith Seeking Understanding: An Introduction to Christian Theology (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2004)
^ Compare: Jenson? Robert W. (1997). "1: What Systematic Theology Is About". Systematic Theology (?. revised). Oxford: Oxford University Press (????? ?? 2001). ?. 1: The Triune God. ?. 22. ISBN : 9780195145984 . ????? ?? ????? ?? 2021-11-24 . ???? ???? ?????? 2019-02-05 . Systematic theology is so called because it takes up questions posed not only by current urgency but also by perceived inherent connections of the faith. Thus systematic theology may raise problems that have not yet emerged in the church's life, and maintain discussions whose immediate ecclesial-pastoral challenge is in abeyance. [...] 'Systematic' theology is [...] concerned with the truth of the gospel, whether dogmatically defined or not.
^ 2 Pet 1:20?21 . ???? ?????? 2021-04-11 ?? Wayback Machine
^ Daniel B. Wallace (1996). Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament . Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan. ?. 313 ?314. ISBN : 0-310-21895-0 . Many scholars feel that the translation should be: 'Every inspired scripture is also profitable.' This is probably not the best translation, however, for the following reasons: (1) Contextually [...] (2) Grammatically [...]
^ ????:Oed
^ Catechism of the Catholic Church, Inspiration and Truth of Sacred Scripture (§105?108) ???? ?????? 9 ?????? 2010 ?? Wayback Machine
^ Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy (1978), Online text : "Article XI We affirm that Scripture, having been given by divine inspiration, is infallible, so that, far from misleading us, it is true and reliable in all the matters it addresses." ???? ?????? 2022-01-17 ?? Wayback Machine
^ Compare: "Bible Infallibility - 'Evangelical' Defenders of the Faith" . The Westminster Review . Leonard Scott Publication. ?. 75: 49. ????? 1861. ????? ?? ????? ?? 2020-05-24 . ???? ???? ?????? 2020-09-06 . [...] the doctrine of the infallibility of the Bible, a doctrine which, according to Mr. Ayre and his school, the apostles held and Christ sanctioned; which from the earliest times the Church has adopted, and which the plenary as well as the verbal inspirationists still maintain.
^ Catholic Encyclopedia: Canon of the New Testament : "The idea of a complete and clear-cut canon of the New Testament existing from the beginning, that is from Apostolic times, has no foundation in history." ???? ?????? 2021-10-22 ?? Wayback Machine

????? ?????? [ ??? ]

?? ????? ??? ?????? ??: ??? ??????? ???????

[1] Entwistle, David N., Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity , p148 ???? ?????? 2020-01-26 ?? Wayback Machine

[2] See, e.g., Daniel L. Migliore, Faith Seeking Understanding: An Introduction to Christian Theology (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2004)

[3] Compare: Jenson? Robert W. (1997). "1: What Systematic Theology Is About". Systematic Theology (?. revised). Oxford: Oxford University Press (????? ?? 2001). ?. 1: The Triune God. ?. 22. ISBN : 9780195145984 . ????? ?? ????? ?? 2021-11-24 . ???? ???? ?????? 2019-02-05 . Systematic theology is so called because it takes up questions posed not only by current urgency but also by perceived inherent connections of the faith. Thus systematic theology may raise problems that have not yet emerged in the church's life, and maintain discussions whose immediate ecclesial-pastoral challenge is in abeyance. [...] 'Systematic' theology is [...] concerned with the truth of the gospel, whether dogmatically defined or not.

[4] 2 Pet 1:20?21 . ???? ?????? 2021-04-11 ?? Wayback Machine

[5] Daniel B. Wallace (1996). Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament . Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan. ?. 313 ?314. ISBN : 0-310-21895-0 . Many scholars feel that the translation should be: 'Every inspired scripture is also profitable.' This is probably not the best translation, however, for the following reasons: (1) Contextually [...] (2) Grammatically [...]

[6] ????:Oed

[7] Catechism of the Catholic Church, Inspiration and Truth of Sacred Scripture (§105?108) ???? ?????? 9 ?????? 2010 ?? Wayback Machine

[8] Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy (1978), Online text : "Article XI We affirm that Scripture, having been given by divine inspiration, is infallible, so that, far from misleading us, it is true and reliable in all the matters it addresses." ???? ?????? 2022-01-17 ?? Wayback Machine

[9] Compare: "Bible Infallibility - 'Evangelical' Defenders of the Faith" . The Westminster Review . Leonard Scott Publication. ?. 75: 49. ????? 1861. ????? ?? ????? ?? 2020-05-24 . ???? ???? ?????? 2020-09-06 . [...] the doctrine of the infallibility of the Bible, a doctrine which, according to Mr. Ayre and his school, the apostles held and Christ sanctioned; which from the earliest times the Church has adopted, and which the plenary as well as the verbal inspirationists still maintain.

[10] Catholic Encyclopedia: Canon of the New Testament : "The idea of a complete and clear-cut canon of the New Testament existing from the beginning, that is from Apostolic times, has no foundation in history." ???? ?????? 2021-10-22 ?? Wayback Machine

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]