Shortcuts
:
COM:AN/B
??
COM:AN/P
??
COM:RFPP
Note
- For page protection requests, please state
protection type
, file name, and proposed protection time span. See also:
Protection Policy
.
- Before proposing a user be blocked, please familiarize yourself with the Commons'
Blocking Policy
.
- Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (
~~~~
), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
- Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s).
{{subst:
Discussion-notice
|noticeboard=COM:AN/B|thread=|reason=}}
is available for this.
- Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.
The edit warring seems to have died down and it does not seem as if it will ruin everything, simply by unlocking it.
It should be fine to at least lower it.
Kxeon
(
talk
)
14:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- @
Yann
:
I think we could probably lower it to autopatroller.
Abzeronow
(
talk
)
16:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- I'd agree with that
Bedivere
(
talk
)
17:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done
Reduced protection to autoconfirmed. I would raise it again if disruption starts again.
Yann
(
talk
)
19:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Added to my watchlist.
Abzeronow
(
talk
)
19:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Obvious sock of
Soladoye Kerimot
(
talk
·
contribs
); uploading the same repeatedly-deleted file as previous socks. See history of
File:Adewale Olalekan.jpg
.
Marbletan
(
talk
)
16:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done
.
I warned the user.
You are right, this is sockpuppet and I blocked him indefinitely. The only upload is deleted.
Taivo
(
talk
)
08:34, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A disruptive user,
NorthTension
keeps forcing files, especially these two files to have standardized colors despite at the time it not being such colors. He keeps citing the reasons that he does so to be "colors, the PRC flag has been standardized to this specific shade so it stands within reason that everything else derived from it should be this color too as it is on wikimedia", which doesn't count for making flags non-historical, plus it's stupid because he knows those standardized colors only exist from 2022, which is like around 80 to 90 years after these flags were originally adopted!
Wheatley2
(
talk
)
05:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Holy shit are you serious dude? I literally havent touched either file since May 5th and May 11th respectively, and then you come onto
my
profile to annoy me about this, and when I give you an answer and tell you to knock it off you do this?
NorthTension
(
talk
)
06:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- I call it extra measures.
Wheatley2
(
talk
)
06:29, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Why did you make
this post
on my talkpage anyways? I don't care that you deleted it you very clearly have some kind of personal issue with me that you've decided to escalate to the Noticeboard for some reason I can't fathom.
NorthTension
(
talk
)
06:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Man get over it I say it's over so say it's over as well
(because it is)
Wheatley2
(
talk
)
06:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Plus I did remove that thing because I changed my mind. I just did this to ensure no supporter of you does it again
Wheatley2
(
talk
)
06:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- And your last "reply" read "Print =/= digital". What does that even mean?
Wheatley2
(
talk
)
06:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- The discussion above is closed.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Yarlet
(
talk
·
contributions
·
Move log
·
block log
·
uploads
·
Abuse filter log
)?
block user
Username for spam or containing advertising purposes All the best --
Chuck
Talk
22:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done
indef blocked, deleted
Bedivere
(
talk
)
00:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hello, please unlock
this image
to download the new Talysh Wikipedia logo because... Unfortunately, there are errors in the spelling of words and the display of the alphabet used in the Talysh Wikipedia. It should be written:
VikipedijA
,
S?rb?st? Ensiklopedij?
. A corresponding discussion took place at the local level -
here
. Best regards,
Гусейнага
(
talk
)
11:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Please upload the file under another name and I will merge them @
Гусейнага
Bedivere
(
talk
)
15:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- @
Bedivere
I uploaded a new logo -
here
.
Гусейнага
(
talk
)
22:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- @
Гусейнага
Is there consensus to make the change to that version? I don't think it conforms to the actual typography of the logo. See
wmf:Legal:Wikimedia trademarks/Word mark creation
. Once you confirm, I will perform the change.
Bedivere
(
talk
)
23:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- I have updated the logo using the actual typography. Please let me know if anything is wrong.
Bedivere
(
talk
)
00:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
User:Xiaoyao1979
appears to be only interested in promotion based on their activity here and on the EN.
TornadoLGS
(
talk
)
04:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done
nuked, blocked.
Bedivere
(
talk
)
05:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Repeated spam PDF uploads.
Omphalographer
(
talk
)
08:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done
Blocked, file deleted.
Yann
(
talk
)
08:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
A1Cafel
(
talk
)
02:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done
Indefblocked.
Bedivere
(
talk
)
03:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
A1Cafel
(
talk
)
02:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done
indefblocked.
Bedivere
(
talk
)
03:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Amadacmm
(
talk
·
contributions
·
Move log
·
block log
·
uploads
·
Abuse filter log
)?
block user
An account solely for the purpose of vandalism All the best --
Chuck
Talk
15:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Innoebere Chukwu
(
talk
·
contributions
·
Move log
·
block log
·
uploads
·
Abuse filter log
)?
block user
An account solely for advertising purposes All the best --
Chuck
Talk
16:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done
. Currently block is not needed. I warned the user.
Taivo
(
talk
)
08:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Jozpafol
(
talk
·
contributions
·
Move log
·
block log
·
uploads
·
Abuse filter log
)?
block user
An account solely for the purpose of vandalism All the best --
Chuck
Talk
16:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Not done
. I do not think so. Only one upload, not even nominated for deletion. You can warn the user, if you like.
Taivo
(
talk
)
08:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
EthanGaming6780
(
talk
·
contributions
·
Move log
·
block log
·
uploads
·
Abuse filter log
)?
block user
An account solely for advertising purposes All the best --
Chuck
Talk
20:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done
. One week block.
Taivo
(
talk
)
08:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Qanat Raiymbek
(
talk
·
contributions
·
Move log
·
block log
·
uploads
·
Abuse filter log
)?
block user
Continuing to upload personal photos despite numerous warnings. All the best --
Chuck
Talk
20:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done
. 2 weeks block, everything is deleted.
Taivo
(
talk
)
08:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Ellapizgastronomico
(
talk
·
contributions
·
Move log
·
block log
·
uploads
·
Abuse filter log
)?
block user
An account solely for advertising purposes All the best --
Chuck
Talk
01:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done
. One week block, everything is deleted.
Taivo
(
talk
)
08:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
User is already blocked without an expiration time on the Russian Wikipedia for misleading username. It is worth noting that user is blocked on the Russian Wikipedia as a person, not just account, meaning if user will create a new account, it will be blocked by a checkuser for block evasion. Here (on the Wikimedia Commons) it is necessary to decide whether to block an actual person or just account. The only file uploaded here by this user is
File:SOLPARTNERS.png
, which might violate copyright.
Guest Kashapov
(
talk
)
08:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Not a copyvio: the file is too simple for copyright protection.
Taivo
(
talk
)
08:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- But username is misleading, so it is best to block account but not an actual person, meaning user will be allowed to create a new account. I would request global lock at
m:Steward requests/Global
, but that page is protected and I aren't autoconfirmed on Meta.
Guest Kashapov
(
talk
)
08:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Pure UAA violations such as this are not a reason to lock an account.
A09
(
talk
)
16:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Calling Commons users
assholes
and
nominating my user page for deletion
saying
An idiot took a picture of something that does not belong to the idiot
, whatever that's meant to mean.
This is after a
final warning for incivility
. No constructive contributions.
Belbury
(
talk
)
13:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done
indefinitely blocked.
GPSLeo
(
talk
)
13:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
AnwerHossan
(
talk
·
contributions
·
Move log
·
block log
·
uploads
·
Abuse filter log
)?
block user
An account solely for advertising purposes All the best --
Chuck
Talk
17:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Mithila Delpachithra
(
talk
·
contributions
·
Move log
·
block log
·
uploads
·
Abuse filter log
)?
block user
Vandalism despite multiple warnings All the best --
Chuck
Talk
17:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Rts5522
(
talk
·
contributions
·
Move log
·
block log
·
uploads
·
Abuse filter log
)?
block user
An account solely for the purpose of vandalism All the best --
Chuck
Talk
17:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hear Care
(
talk
·
contributions
·
Move log
·
block log
·
uploads
·
Abuse filter log
)?
block user
Username for spam or containing advertising purposes All the best --
Chuck
Talk
18:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hear Care
(
talk
·
contributions
·
Move log
·
block log
·
uploads
·
Abuse filter log
)?
block user
Username for spam or containing advertising purposes All the best --
Chuck
Talk
18:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]