•  


Meta Stack Overflow Comment Archive - 2024-05-03
« first day (1737 days earlier)    

12:03 AM
[ Boson light ] New comment posted by rand'Chris
I searched before asking my question. There are dozens of discussions about "review audits" like the one you linked to, and I have no idea why that is the case. My questions is absolutely and unequivocally not talking about anything like that. Thanks. — rand'Chris 22 secs ago
 
12:57 AM
[ Boson light ] New comment posted by M--
You basically formalized what I had in mind, but more eloquently. Thank you. — M-- 38 secs ago
 
1:33 AM
[ Boson light ] New comment posted by Spectric
@Cerbrus he's already served his punishment; no one is making him post this apology, so I see this as a complete win. — Spectric 7 secs ago
 
 
2 hours later…
3:19 AM
[ Boson light ] New comment posted by chivracq
You wouldn't (have) qualify/ied btw @OP, nor in Novb 2022 nor May 2024 (when I post this Comment), 47/61 < 90%. I like your Prop Ryan_Mod, maybe a bit tuned: Absolute Rep >1000. + 50 Edits in the last 2y with 90% 'Approved'. => Can do Edits directly without going through the 'Sugg-Edits' Queue. But keep 2000 for having access to the Queue. // I know for myself I can do "correct Edits" (40 Edits in 9y, all 'Approved', except 1 on a 'Tag-Wiki'), and I only do Edits for Threads "I care for" (Quality-sake or "my Tag"), but I'm not sure I would be able to "judge" in the 'Sugg-Edits' Queue. — chivracq just now
 
3:37 AM
[ Boson light ] New comment posted by kesarling He-Him
PS: The question still hasn't been taken down. — kesarling He-Him 8 secs ago
[ Boson light ] New comment posted by chivracq
Paradoxally, I think somebody who made 100 or 200 Edits and "regularly" got some 'Rejected' ones in the beginning and then improve(d) their "Quality" might be better at judging what are the Criteria for "good Edits" because they self got those 'Rejected' (and understood why their Edits were 'Rejected' then...). — chivracq 9 secs ago
 
3:52 AM
[ Boson light ] New comment posted by cocomac
The linked question has now been deleted. — cocomac 30 secs ago
 
4:29 AM
[ Boson light ] New comment posted by Dan Schwartz
You claimed I was rude, but your link was to someone else's post, not mine. — Dan Schwartz 37 secs ago
 
 
1 hour later…
5:30 AM
[ Boson light ] New comment posted by chivracq
Qt Dv'ed for "elliptic"/vague Title, a bit "click-bait", I didn't really understand what it was about, SO-Question Link to follow => Page not found, not much advanced... // I only understood "the whole picture" from @cocomac's Answer... => care to give a bit more descriptive/explicit Title...? => Stg like "Why didn't the SmokeDetector Anti-Spam Bot spot this obvious Spam-Question?", or stg similar... — chivracq 22 secs ago
 

« first day (1737 days earlier)    
- "漢字路" 한글한자자동변환 서비스는 교육부 고전문헌국역지원사업의 지원으로 구축되었습니다.
- "漢字路" 한글한자자동변환 서비스는 전통문화연구회 "울산대학교한국어처리연구실 옥철영(IT융합전공)교수팀"에서 개발한 한글한자자동변환기를 바탕하여 지속적으로 공동 연구 개발하고 있는 서비스입니다.
- 현재 고유명사(인명, 지명등)을 비롯한 여러 변환오류가 있으며 이를 해결하고자 많은 연구 개발을 진행하고자 하고 있습니다. 이를 인지하시고 다른 곳에서 인용시 한자 변환 결과를 한번 더 검토하시고 사용해 주시기 바랍니다.
- 변환오류 및 건의,문의사항은 juntong@juntong.or.kr로 메일로 보내주시면 감사하겠습니다. .
Copyright ⓒ 2020 By '전통문화연구회(傳統文化硏究會)' All Rights reserved.
 한국   대만   중국   일본