•  


Ignore but report invalid keys by SimplyDanny · Pull Request #5567 · realm/SwiftLint · GitHub
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement . We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore but report invalid keys #5567

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 11, 2024

Conversation

SimplyDanny
Copy link
Collaborator

@SimplyDanny SimplyDanny commented May 11, 2024

In other words, don't fall back to the default configuration due to invalid keys.

Fixes #5565 .

@SwiftLintBot
Copy link

SwiftLintBot commented May 11, 2024

17 Messages
?? Linting Aerial with this PR took 0.8s vs 0.81s on main (1% faster)
?? Linting Alamofire with this PR took 1.14s vs 1.17s on main (2% faster)
?? Linting Brave with this PR took 6.52s vs 6.68s on main (2% faster)
?? Linting DuckDuckGo with this PR took 3.44s vs 3.49s on main (1% faster)
?? Linting Firefox with this PR took 9.23s vs 9.37s on main (1% faster)
?? Linting Kickstarter with this PR took 8.11s vs 8.1s on main (0% slower)
?? Linting Moya with this PR took 0.49s vs 0.49s on main (0% slower)
?? Linting NetNewsWire with this PR took 2.41s vs 2.36s on main (2% slower)
?? Linting Nimble with this PR took 0.69s vs 0.69s on main (0% slower)
?? Linting PocketCasts with this PR took 6.84s vs 6.86s on main (0% faster)
?? Linting Quick with this PR took 0.34s vs 0.34s on main (0% slower)
?? Linting Realm with this PR took 4.02s vs 3.97s on main (1% slower)
?? Linting Sourcery with this PR took 2.1s vs 2.12s on main (0% faster)
?? Linting Swift with this PR took 3.91s vs 3.96s on main (1% faster)
?? Linting VLC with this PR took 1.09s vs 1.14s on main (4% faster)
?? Linting Wire with this PR took 14.25s vs 14.28s on main (0% faster)
?? Linting WordPress with this PR took 9.78s vs 9.75s on main (0% slower)

Generated by ?? Danger

@SimplyDanny SimplyDanny enabled auto-merge (squash) May 11, 2024 10:12
@SimplyDanny SimplyDanny merged commit c29391a into realm : main May 11, 2024
12 checks passed
@SimplyDanny SimplyDanny deleted the report-invalid-keys branch May 11, 2024 10:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub . Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

There is a problem with allowed_symbols rule configuration after updating to 0.54.0
2 participants
- "漢字路" 한글한자자동변환 서비스는 교육부 고전문헌국역지원사업의 지원으로 구축되었습니다.
- "漢字路" 한글한자자동변환 서비스는 전통문화연구회 "울산대학교한국어처리연구실 옥철영(IT융합전공)교수팀"에서 개발한 한글한자자동변환기를 바탕하여 지속적으로 공동 연구 개발하고 있는 서비스입니다.
- 현재 고유명사(인명, 지명등)을 비롯한 여러 변환오류가 있으며 이를 해결하고자 많은 연구 개발을 진행하고자 하고 있습니다. 이를 인지하시고 다른 곳에서 인용시 한자 변환 결과를 한번 더 검토하시고 사용해 주시기 바랍니다.
- 변환오류 및 건의,문의사항은 juntong@juntong.or.kr로 메일로 보내주시면 감사하겠습니다. .
Copyright ⓒ 2020 By '전통문화연구회(傳統文化硏究會)' All Rights reserved.
 한국   대만   중국   일본