The START negotiations were successors to the
Strategic Arms Limitation Talks
of the 1970s. In resuming strategic-arms negotiations with the Soviet Union in 1982, U.S. Pres.
Ronald Reagan
renamed the talks START and proposed radical reductions, rather than merely limitations, in each superpower’s existing stocks of missiles and warheads. In 1983 the Soviet Union abandoned arms control talks in protest against the deployment of intermediate-range missiles in western Europe (
see
Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty
). In 1985 START resumed, and the talks culminated in July 1991 with a
comprehensive
strategic-arms-reduction agreement signed by U.S. Pres.
George H.W. Bush
and Soviet leader
Mikhail Gorbachev
. The new treaty was ratified without difficulty in the U.S. Senate, but in December 1991 the Soviet Union broke up, leaving in its wake four independent republics with strategic nuclear weapons?
Belarus
,
Kazakhstan
,
Ukraine
, and
Russia
. In May 1992 the Lisbon
Protocol
was signed, which allowed for all four to become parties to START I and for Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan either to destroy their strategic nuclear warheads or to turn them over to Russia. This made possible ratification by the new Russian Duma, although not before yet another agreement had been reached with Ukraine setting the terms for the transfer of all the nuclear warheads on its territory to Russia. All five START I parties exchanged the instruments of ratification in Budapest on Dec. 5, 1994.
The START I treaty set limits to be reached in a first phase within three years and then a second phase within five years. By the end of the second phase, in 1999, both the United States and Russia would be permitted a total of 7,950 warheads on a maximum of 1,900 delivery vehicles (missiles and bombers). This limit involved reductions from established levels of about 11,000 warheads on each side. Of the 7,950 permitted warheads, no more than 6,750 could be mounted on
deployed
intercontinental
ballistic
missiles (ICBMs) and submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs). The treaty included demanding verification measures, including on-site inspection, monitors at the Russian mobile ICBM factory at
Votkinsk
, and access to missile
telemetry
, which provides details of the characteristics of missiles being tested. By early 1997 Belarus and Kazakhstan had reached zero nuclear warheads, and Ukraine destroyed its last ICBMs in 1999. The United States and Russia reached the required levels for the second phase during 1997.
A third phase was to be completed by the end of 2001, when both sides were to get down to 6,000 warheads on a maximum of 1,600 delivery vehicles, with no more than 4,900 warheads on deployed ICBMs and SLBMs. Although there had been concerns that this goal would not be achieved because of the expense and difficulty of decommissioning weapons, both sides enacted their cuts by 2001. The START I treaty expired on Dec. 5, 2009.
During the negotiations on START I, one of the most controversial issues had been how to handle limits on nuclear-armed
cruise missiles
, as verification would be difficult to
implement
. The issue was finally handled by means of separate political declarations by which the two sides agreed to announce annually their planned cruise missile deployments, which were not to exceed 880.
START II
Even as they agreed on the outline of START I in 1990, the United States and the Soviet Union accepted that further reductions should be negotiated. However, real negotiations had to wait for the elections that established the leadership of the new Russian Federation in 1992. The START II treaty was agreed on at two summit meetings between George H.W. Bush and Russian Pres.
Boris Yeltsin
, the first in Washington, D.C., in June 1992 and the second in
Moscow
in January 1993. Under its terms, both sides would reduce their strategic warheads to 3,800?4,250 by 2000 and to 3,000?3,500 by 2003. They would also eliminate multiple independent reentry vehicles (
MIRVs
) on their ICBMs?in effect eliminating two of the more controversial missiles of the Cold War, the U.S.
Peacekeeper missile
and the Russian SS-18. Later, in order to
accommodate
the delays in signing and ratifying START I, the deadlines were put back to 2004 and 2007, respectively.
Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content.
Subscribe Now
START II never actually came into force. The U.S. Senate did not ratify the treaty until 1996, largely because the parallel process was moving so slowly in the Russian Duma. There the treaty became a hostage to growing Russian irritation with Western policies in the
Persian Gulf
and the Balkans and then to concerns over American attitudes toward the
Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty
. The Russian preference would have been for far lower final levels, as Russia lacked the resources to replace many of its aging weapons systems, but achieved at a slower pace, because it also lacked the resources for speedy decommissioning. In 2000 the Duma linked the fate of START II to the ABM Treaty, and in June 2002, following the United States’ withdrawal from the ABM Treaty, the Duma
repudiated
START II.