New Shepard has already made repeated hops above 62 miles, the altitude considered the boundary of outer space. However, unlike Falcon 9, it has not and cannot accelerate to the speeds needed to orbit Earth.
Its strategy is to perfect the technology through many New Shepard launches, and then apply it to
New Glenn
, an orbital rocket bigger than Falcon 9, that is to start launching from Cape Canaveral around 2020. The first stage of New Glenn is to land similar to the way SpaceX recovers the Falcon 9 boosters.
Older rocket companies like United Launch Alliance, a joint venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin, have studied reusable rocket concepts in the past but concluded the trade-offs were not worth the benefits. For example, saving fuel for the booster landing reduces the amount of payload the rocket can take to orbit, and reusing rockets could raise the cost of building new ones, because fewer would be built.
The United Launch Alliance is planning a bit of reusability for its next rocket, the Vulcan. But instead of landing the entire first stage, the plan is for the engine compartment ? the most valuable piece ? to eject and descend via parachute, and then be plucked out of the air by a helicopter.
Blue Origin and SpaceX appear to be betting that cheaper launches will lead to many more flights into space, for commercial and tourism jaunts.
What About NASA’s Big New Rocket?
NASA is currently developing the Space Launch System, which is to become the most powerful rocket ever, to take astronauts to deep space and eventually Mars. The booster stage, with four engines, and two additional boosters on the sides, will all be thrown away every launch.
Daniel Dumbacher, a former NASA official who oversaw development of S.L.S. and now a professor at Purdue University, said the agency did study the possibility. But it concluded that the rocket’s immense size and the small number of launches ? one every year or two ? were not worth the cost.