한국   대만   중국   일본 
wikipedia.org - Site Info from Alexa
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20100209022129/http://www.alexa.com:80/siteinfo/wikipedia.org

Alexa traffic rank for wikipedia.org:

  Traffic Rank Change
Yesterday 7 +1 Change in Traffic Rank over the trailing 1d period
7 day 6 0
1 month 6 0
3 month 6 0

Percent of global pageviews on wikipedia.org:

  Pageviews Change
Yesterday 0.5627 +4.3% Change in Pageviews over the trailing 1d period
7 day 0.5549 -0.3% Change in Pageviews over the trailing 1w period
1 month 0.5583 +6.25% Change in Pageviews over the trailing 1m period
3 month 0.55069 +25.18% Change in Pageviews over the trailing 3m period

Percent of global Internet users who visit wikipedia.org:

  Reach Change
Yesterday 12.2 -3.6% Change in Reach over the trailing 1d period
7 day 13.08 +0.8% Change in Reach over the trailing 1w period
1 month 13.006 +8% Change in Reach over the trailing 1m period
3 month 12.56 +24.56% Change in Reach over the trailing 3m period

The percentage of visits to wikipedia.org that consist of a single page turn:

  Bounce % Change
Yesterday 45.4 -5% Change in Bounce % over the trailing 1d period
7 day 47.1 0%
1 month 46.7 +2% Change in Bounce % over the trailing 1m period
3 month 46.2 +1% Change in Bounce % over the trailing 3m period

Daily pageviews per user for wikipedia.org:

  Pageviews/User Change
Yesterday 4.52 +8.1% Change in Pageviews/User over the trailing 1d period
7 day 4.31 -1.1% Change in Pageviews/User over the trailing 1w period
1 month 4.35 -1.8% Change in Pageviews/User over the trailing 1m period
3 month 4.38 +0.5% Change in Pageviews/User over the trailing 3m period

Daily time on site for wikipedia.org:

  Time on Site Change
Yesterday 5.405 +7% Change in Time on Site over the trailing 1d period
7 day 5.24 -1% Change in Time on Site over the trailing 1w period
1 month 5.32833 -1% Change in Time on Site over the trailing 1m period
3 month 5.35667 +2% Change in Time on Site over the trailing 3m period
Compare to:
Learn more about Alexa Traffic Stats .

Optimize your search traffic with Alexa Search Analytics!

Where Visitors Go on Wikipedia.org

Subdomain

Percent of Site Traffic

en.wikipedia.org

54.0%

ja.wikipedia.org

10.3%

de.wikipedia.org

8.1%

es.wikipedia.org

5.7%

ru.wikipedia.org

3.5%

fr.wikipedia.org

3.5%

it.wikipedia.org

2.9%

wikipedia.org

1.6%

pl.wikipedia.org

1.5%

pt.wikipedia.org

1.5%

zh.wikipedia.org

1.1%

ar.wikipedia.org

0.7%

nl.wikipedia.org

0.7%

fa.wikipedia.org

0.6%

sv.wikipedia.org

0.5%

tr.wikipedia.org

0.5%

id.wikipedia.org

0.4%

th.wikipedia.org

0.3%

cs.wikipedia.org

0.3%

he.wikipedia.org

0.2%

no.wikipedia.org

0.2%

fi.wikipedia.org

0.2%

wikipedia.de

0.2%

vi.wikipedia.org

0.1%

hu.wikipedia.org

0.1%

el.wikipedia.org

0.1%

ro.wikipedia.org

0.1%

da.wikipedia.org

0.1%

sr.wikipedia.org

0.1%

lt.wikipedia.org

0.1%

bg.wikipedia.org

0.1%

hr.wikipedia.org

0.1%

ca.wikipedia.org

0.1%

ko.wikipedia.org

0.1%

uk.wikipedia.org

0.0%

sk.wikipedia.org

0.0%

simple.wikipedia.org

0.0%

mobile.wikipedia.org

0.0%

OTHER

0.4%

 

Average Load Time for Wikipedia.org

Average (2.079 Seconds), 57% of sites are slower.


Is this your website?

Update your listing data using our Self-service tools .

Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
P.O. Box 78350
San Francisco, CA 94107
US
info-en [at] wikimedia.org



Is this your website?

Update your listing data using our Self-service tools .

Review Summary for wikipedia.org

101 User Reviews

5 stars (86)
4 stars (6)
3 stars (3)
2 stars (2)
1 stars (4)


Write a Review
This is a great help in schools, though teachers don't like wikipedia as a source because, Most of the time the informations is correct, there is some false information.
Free online encyclopedia about everything.

smilesol*com
  • Was this useful?
  • Yes
  • No
  • 5 out of 7 people found this review useful.
  • 5 Stars
  • All the infos i need
  • by ddong2
  • Jan 29, 2010
even though some might be not true.. (most are) but helps a lot back when i was in school lol
ns2forum*com
Ce site est une très bonne initiative! Bien que ça ne soit pas une encyclopédie officielle, c'est une excellente façon de conserver le savoir! Donner la chance aux gens de pouvoir y apporter des modifications est très bon aussi même si ça peut aussi amener de la fausse information!
  • 5 Stars
  • Brilliant Resource
  • by questcctv
  • Jan 18, 2010
An excellent place to help with any kind of research. The information on this site is brilliant.
  • 4 Stars
  • Good Source, Treat with caution
  • by mikegale
  • Jan 14, 2010
Wikipedia is an excellent first source of information, BUT what it says should be treated with caution.

The unpaid volunteers who have built this remarkable body of information have in general done a great job.

Like anything that becomes well known there are things to watch out for. In controversial areas "editing wars" occur where opposing sides attempt to slant the content to suit themselves. Watch out for these and if you find one, use your common sense to find other information.

The original "rules" developed for editors have been taken too seriously by some of those who appear to spend much of their lives editing it. Some of them individually make more than a thousand edits a month. That amounts to more than 30 edits a day!! These "professional editors" contribute a disproportionate amount of the content.

Some of them have the unpleasant habit of destroying contributions not made by the "inner cabal" and defacing pages with messages (saying like 'page not good enough') instead of just fixing the page.

[To find out more consult the "Augmented Social Cognition" blog which is published by the PARC (Palo Alto Research Centre).]

Wikipedia has great tools for looking into the past. Today I was looking at an article started several years ago. I compared the original version (from February 2007) with the present one (January 2010). Over 3 years the article actually had less facts than were originally present.

Very useful BUT be careful. If you find a page that looks suspicious, to you, research further.
www . cd4all . info
  • Was this useful?
  • Yes
  • No
  • 0 out of 1 person found this review useful.
  • 5 Stars
  • Wikipedia is like an older brother - always there for you to answer all your questions!
  • by mpod
  • Jan 06, 2010
Until this site came to existence dark internet was as in dark ‘medieval’ age. And for those who needed information for their studies or professional work, they had to spend hours looking for free reliable information.

It was disorganized and hard to find. It was so inconvenient to have to go to the library every time I needed to get an answer from a good source.

But right now everything has changed, thanks to wikipedia. It has so much free and useful information that is organized and quite trustworthy. And most importantly it has a whole list of useful links that really help to study the subject in depth.

I love wikipedia for its noncommercial nature, no spam and tons of great, well delivered information!

Thanks to wikipedia I don’t have to worry about every appearing unprofessional in my dietology and nutrition field.

Marina, from Healthy Dietpedia
  • Was this useful?
  • Yes
  • No
  • 0 out of 3 people found this review useful.
  • 3 Stars
  • BEST Biography, DETAILS, ...
  • by alpha
  • Jan 06, 2010
But politics into scientific issues and research has
  • Was this useful?
  • Yes
  • No
  • 6 out of 9 people found this review useful.
  • 5 Stars
  • Ahmet Nuray Sitesi - Alexa Sitesi - wikipedida Sitesi - Sanatsal Tasarım
  • by haticesendil
  • Jan 04, 2010
Alexa sitesi içinde yer alan, wikipedia ve Ahmet Nuray sitesini ararken; faydalı bilgileri olan e?itim sitelerine eri?tim. Atletizmde yüksek atlama resimleri aramanın neticesinde, faydalı bilgiler sayfası olan Ahmet Nuray sitesinin e?itici makale yazılarına eri?ebilmek, wikipedia sitesindeki yardımcı bilgiler sayesinde gerçekle?ti. ?nternette sörf yapmanın faydaları bu olsa gerek. Alexa web sitesinin sundu?u faydaları ara?tırmak için siteye üye oldum. Faydalarının daha fazla oldu?una eminim. Zaman içinde ö?reneceklerimi, bu kö?e yazılarındaki faydalı bilgilerde sörf yaparak yakalama imkanı bulmaya niyetliyim. Sanatsal tasarım fikirlerine öncülük eden wikipedia sayfalarına ve pedagoji sanatçısı Ahmet Nuray makale yazılarının ı?ı?ına gerçekten aydınlanma adına ihtiyacım olacak. Atletizmde yüksek atlama resimlerinin ara?tırması neticesinde, tesadüfen elde etti?im yeni fikirlerin sanatsal dü?ünceleri destekleyen site yetkililerine te?ekkür ederim.
Yazan: Makale yazıları ele?tirmeni Hatice ?endil
  • Was this useful?
  • Yes
  • No
  • 0 out of 1 person found this review useful.


Is this your website?

Get site widgets that encourage users to review your website - Reviews Widget .

Is this your site?  Add a review widget!

Search Traffic

The percentage of site visits from search engines.

Period

Percent of Site Traffic

Last 30 days

54.3%

Last 7 days

53.6%

Yesterday

51.7%

 
Keyword Research Tool - Find More Keywords
Identify which keywords are searched for, which keywords drive the most traffic and what the PPC bids are using Trellian's KeywordDiscovery.com keyword tool .

Search Terms with a High Web-Wide Ranking Driving Traffic

Keywords that generate a significant number of queries on internet search engines and drive traffic to wikipedia.org. Ordered by the global popularity of the search terms, in combination with the number of website hits generated on wikipedia.org.

Visitors by Country for Wikipedia.org

You need Flash 8 to view the map.

 
Optimize your search traffic with Alexa Search Analytics!

Audience Demographics for Wikipedia.org

Relative to the general internet population how popular is wikipedia.org with each audience below?



??在可以在Alexa中文官方?站cn.alexa.com上?取 wikipedia.org的?站流量信息