한국   대만   중국   일본 
HistCite - index: Papers Citing: A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine, plus outer references
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20091216033346/http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu:80/histcomp/lock-difficult-bal_2/index-lcs.html
Missing Links? Citation Matrix Graphs Glossary    HistCite Guide    About
Fri Jun 25 11:07:20 2004
Papers Citing "A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine"
and these papers added:
PETERS DP, 1982, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V5, P187
ZUCKERMAN H, 1971, MINERVA, V9, P66
BAILAR JC, 1985, NEW ENGL J MED, V312, P654
INGELFINGER FJ, 1974, AM J MED, V56, P686
HORROBIN DF, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P1438
COLE S, 1981, SCIENCE, V214, P881
WILSON JD, 1978, J CLIN INVEST, V61, P1697
KASSIRER JP, 1994, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V272, P96
MAHONEY MJ, 1977, COGNITIVE THERAPY RE, V1, P161
LOCK S, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P1341

Nodes: 216
Authors : 260, Journals : 121, Outer References : 4003
Collection span: 1967 - 2003
View: Overview. Sorted by LCS .
Page  1 :  1   2   3

# LCR NCR Nodes / Authors / Date LCS GCS
1 0   8 1985 Book 1(1):1-
Lock S
A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine
204 204
2 3 60 7 1982 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):187-195
PETERS DP; CECI SJ
PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNALS - THE FATE OF ACCEPTED, PUBLISHED ARTICLES, SUBMITTED AGAIN
37 232
3 1 65 2 1971 MINERVA 9(1):66-100
ZUCKERMAN H; MERTON RK
PATTERNS OF EVALUATION IN SCIENCE - INSTITUTIONALISATION, STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF REFEREE SYSTEM
33 288
4 6 14 79 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1371-1376
MCNUTT RA; EVANS AT; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
33 104
5 4 28 10 1985 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 312(10):654-657
BAILAR JC; PATTERSON K
JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW - THE NEED FOR A RESEARCH AGENDA
29 63
6 1 4 3 1974 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 56(5):686-692
INGELFINGER FJ
PEER REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION
27 76
7 0 5 6 1981 SCIENCE 214(4523):881-886
COLE S; COLE JR; SIMON GA
CHANCE AND CONSENSUS IN PEER-REVIEW
20 142
8 0 24 82 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1438-1441
HORROBIN DF
THE PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS OF PEER-REVIEW AND THE SUPPRESSION OF INNOVATION
20 99
9 3 8 19 1986 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 256(17):2391-2392
RENNIE D
GUARDING THE GUARDIANS - A CONFERENCE ON EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
19 47
10 1 17 5 1978 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION 61(6):1697-1701
WILSON JD
70TH ANNUAL-MEETING OF AMERICAN-SOCIETY-FOR-CLINICAL-INVESTIGATION, SAN-FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, 30 APRIL 1978 - PRESIDENTIAL-ADDRESS
18 46
# LCR NCR Nodes / Authors / Date LCS GCS
11 0   4 1977 Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 161-175 1(2):161-175
MAHONEY MJ
Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system
15 197
12 3 14 127 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):96-97
KASSIRER JP; CAMPION EW
PEER-REVIEW - CRUDE AND UNDERSTUDIED, BUT INDISPENSABLE
15 50
13 6 11 70 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1317-1317
RENNIE D
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION - THE 1ST-INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS
14 48
14 0 22 1 1967 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 2(4):195-201
CRANE D
GATEKEEPERS OF SCIENCE - SOME FACTORS AFFECTING SELECTION OF ARTICLES FOR SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS
12 162
15 1 7 71 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1321-1322
KRONICK DA
PEER-REVIEW IN 18TH-CENTURY SCIENTIFIC JOURNALISM
11 35
16 1 6 74 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1341-1343
LOCK S; SMITH J
WHAT DO PEER REVIEWERS DO
11 34
17 11 36 119 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):11-21
GOODMAN SN; BERLIN J; FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH
MANUSCRIPT QUALITY BEFORE AND AFTER PEER-REVIEW AND EDITING AT ANNALS OF INTERNAL-MEDICINE
11 68
18 6 25 131 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):143-146
FISHER M; FRIEDMAN SB; STRAUSS B
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW
11 42
19 6 12 173 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):234-237
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review - A randomized trial
11 42
20 1 8 75 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1344-1347
WELLER AC
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN UNITED-STATES MEDICAL JOURNALS
10 32
# LCR NCR Nodes / Authors / Date LCS GCS
21 11 182 91 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):119-134
CICCHETTI DV
THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION
10 80
22 4 20 27 1987 CHEST 91(2):252-255
ROBIN ED; BURKE CM
PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICAL JOURNALS
9 14
23 2 10 56 1989 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 321(12):827-829
RELMAN AS; ANGELL M
HOW GOOD IS PEER-REVIEW
9 39
24 4 88 72 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1323-1329
BURNHAM JC
THE EVOLUTION OF EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
9 35
25 2 9 73 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1338-1340
YANKAUER A
WHO ARE THE PEER REVIEWERS AND HOW MUCH DO THEY REVIEW
9 27
26 9 16 121 1994 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309(6948):143-144
SMITH R
PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW
8 28
27 3 27 39 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296(6624):774-777
SMITH R
RESEARCH POLICY - PROBLEMS WITH PEER-REVIEW AND ALTERNATIVES
7 17
28 3 12 81 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1390-1391
SHARP DW
WHAT CAN AND SHOULD BE DONE TO REDUCE PUBLICATION BIAS - THE PERSPECTIVE OF AN EDITOR
7 30
29 1 20 77 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1355-1357
GARDNER MJ; BOND J
AN EXPLORATORY-STUDY OF STATISTICAL ASSESSMENT OF PAPERS PUBLISHED IN THE BRITISH-MEDICAL-JOURNAL
6 60
30 4 14 178 1999 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):4-5
Smith R
Opening up BMJ peer review - A beginning that should lead to complete transparency
6 23
# LCR NCR Nodes / Authors / Date LCS GCS
31 2 12 11 1986 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 105(2):313-320
GARFIELD E
WHICH MEDICAL JOURNALS HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACT
5 79
32 1 1 59 1989 SCIENCE 244(4907):910-910
SUN M
FOLLOWING THE ROYAL-SOCIETY LEAD
5 0
33 2 16 76 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1348-1352
HARGENS LL
VARIATION IN JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW SYSTEMS - POSSIBLE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
5 17
34 3 4 78 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1369-1371
GARFUNKEL JM; ULSHEN MH; HAMRICK HJ; LAWSON EE
PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED BY SECONDARY REVIEW OF ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPTS
5 28
35 5 14 130 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):139-142
GILBERT JR; WILLIAMS ES; LUNDBERG GD
IS THERE GENDER BIAS IN JAMAS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
5 25
36 3 41 25 1987 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 52(5):631-642
BAKANIC V; MCPHAIL C; SIMON RJ
THE MANUSCRIPT REVIEW AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
4 33
37 1 8 36 1988 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 109(3):181-181
RENNIE D; KNOLL E
INVESTIGATING PEER-REVIEW
4 8
38 5 9 43 1988 DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY 22(7-8):601-602
CLEARY JD; ALEXANDER B
BLIND VERSUS NONBLIND REVIEW - SURVEY OF SELECTED MEDICAL JOURNALS
4 13
39 3 20 102 1992 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 116(11):912-919
WILKES MS; DOBLIN BH; SHAPIRO MF
PHARMACEUTICAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN LEADING MEDICAL JOURNALS - EXPERTS ASSESSMENTS
3 116
40 3 27 112 1993 ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION IN ENGLISH 32(2):234-238
DANIEL HD
AN EVALUATION OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS AT ANGEWANDTE-CHEMIE
3 8
# LCR NCR Nodes / Authors / Date LCS GCS
41 7 24 120 1994 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):60-61
LOCK S
DOES EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW WORK
3 11
42 7 20 123 1994 CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 28(8):1134-1139
FABIATO A
ANONYMITY OF REVIEWERS
3 13
43 2 15 128 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):105-107
ABBY M; MASSEY MD; GALANDIUK S; POLK HC
PEER-REVIEW IS AN EFFECTIVE SCREENING PROCESS TO EVALUATE MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS
3 17
44 3 10 165 1998 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 128(1):66-68
Davidoff F
Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded
3 15
45 5 10 207 2002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2759-2760
Rennie D
Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication
3 19
46 1 4 12 1986 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 292(6521):646-646
MORGAN P
PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICAL JOURNALS
2 3
47 1 21 13 1986 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 292(6523):810-812
GARDNER MJ; MACHIN D; CAMPBELL MJ
USE OF CHECK LISTS IN ASSESSING THE STATISTICAL CONTENT OF MEDICAL STUDIES
2 81
48 1 13 15 1986 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 293(6546):550-552
MARTIN B
BIAS IN AWARDING RESEARCH GRANTS
2 5
49 3 25 37 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296(6620):484-488
SMITH R
RESEARCH POLICY - PEERING INTO THE BOWELS OF THE MRC .1. SETTING PRIORITIES
2 12
50 3 11 38 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296(6621):556-560
SMITH R
PEERING INTO THE BOWELS OF THE MRC .2. REVIEW SYSTEMS
2 5
# LCR NCR Nodes / Authors / Date LCS GCS
51 3 94 65 1990 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 113(4):317-325
FYE WB
MEDICAL AUTHORSHIP - TRADITIONS, TRENDS, AND TRIBULATIONS
2 34
52 4 48 66 1990 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 301(6754):756-759
SMITH J
JOURNALOLOGY - OR WHAT EDITORS DO
2 6
53 1 1 80 1990 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1376-1378
GARFUNKEL JM; LAWSON EE; HAMRICK HJ; ULSHEN MH
EFFECT OF ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION ON THE AUTHORS EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS
2 9
54 3 11 103 1992 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 116(11):951-952
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
PHARMACEUTICAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN MEDICAL JOURNALS
2 26
55 1 31 108 1992 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 232(3):223-228
FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH
RESPONSIBILITIES OF MEDICAL JOURNALS TO READERS
2 6
56 7 27 113 1993 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1668-1672
GILLETT R; HARROW J
PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .1. MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE MEDICAL-RESEARCH-COUNCIL
2 12
57 3 5 129 1994 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):137-138
GARFUNKEL JM; ULSHEN MH; HAMRICK HJ; LAWSON EE
EFFECT OF INSTITUTIONAL PRESTIGE ON REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND EDITORIAL DECISIONS
2 13
58 7 14 132 1994 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION 93(5):1877-1880
SCHARSCHMIDT BF; DEAMICIS A; BACCHETTI P; HELD MJ
CHANCE, CONCURRENCE, AND CLUSTERING - ANALYSIS OF REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS ON 1,000 SUBMISSIONS TO THE JOURNAL-OF-CLINICAL-INVESTIGATION
2 11
59 2 328 134 1994 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 72(4):715-802
BLACK B; AYALA FJ; SAFFRANBRINKS C
SCIENCE AND THE LAW IN THE WAKE OF DAUBERT - A NEW SEARCH FOR SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE
2 49
60 6 10 142 1995 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 10(3):255-256
RIGGS JE
PRIORITY, RIVALRY, AND PEER-REVIEW
2 5
# LCR NCR Nodes / Authors / Date LCS GCS
61 1 3 154 1996 PREVENTIVE MEDICINE 25(2):102-104
Frank E
Editors' requests of peer reviewers: A study and a proposal
2 7
62 12 37 155 1996 PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE 26(5):883-886
Wessely S
What do we know about peer review?
2 6
63 9 33 172 1998 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):214-215
Rennie D
Peer review in Prague
2 11
64 3 34 21 1986 JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE 79(11):639-645
SHEPHERD M
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE REDIVIVUS - CONCEPT AND COMMUNICATION
1 4
65 1 1 23 1986 NATURE 322(6074):24-25
HARNAD S
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
1 5
66 6 41 32 1987 JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY 2(2):165-176
MAHONEY MJ
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION AND KNOWLEDGE POLITICS
1 28
67 1 9 40 1988 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 297(6642):156-156
LOCK S
STRUCTURED ABSTRACTS - NOW REQUIRED FOR ALL PAPERS REPORTING CLINICAL-TRIALS
1 15
68 1 4 47 1988 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 19(2):109-115
BANNER JM
PRESERVING THE INTEGRITY OF PEER-REVIEW
1 13
69 1 2 60 1989 SCIENTIST 3(6):9-&
HERXHEIMER A
MAKE SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS MORE RESPONSIVE - AND RESPONSIBLE
1 5
70 1 9 62 1990 ANNALS OF ALLERGY 64(1):1-2
SLY RM
FACILITATION OF COMMUNICATION THROUGH UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS
1 3
# LCR NCR Nodes / Authors / Date LCS GCS
71 5 39 88 1990 SCIENTOMETRICS 19(1-2):91-106
HARGENS LL; HERTING JR
NEGLECTED CONSIDERATIONS IN THE ANALYSIS OF AGREEMENT AMONG JOURNAL REFEREES
1 5
72 1 4 92 1991 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):146-146
FLETCHER JM
JOURNAL AVAILABILITY AND THE QUALITY OF PUBLISHED RESEARCH
1 2
73 7 29 96 1991 JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 6(3):193-195
BRUMBACK RA
PUBLISHING IN BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS - THE SYSTEM IN REVIEW
1 2
74 1 16 101 1991 SURGERY 110(1):1-7
SIMMONS RL; POLK HC; WILLIAMS B; MAVROUDIS C
MISCONDUCT AND FRAUD IN RESEARCH - SOCIAL AND LEGISLATIVE ISSUES SYMPOSIUM OF THE SOCIETY OF UNIVERSITY SURGEONS
1 3
75 4 24 107 1992 JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 232(3):215-221
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
MEDICAL JOURNALS AND SOCIETY - THREATS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
1 7
76 1 28 110 1992 PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES 13(4):393-399
EYSENCK HJ; EYSENCK SBG
PEER-REVIEW - ADVICE TO REFEREES AND CONTRIBUTORS
1 4
77 7 47 122 1994 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 150(8):1211-1216
HUSTON P
INFORMATION FOR PEER REVIEWERS
1 3
78 1 30 135 1995 ANAESTHESIA 50(6):485-487
GOODMAN NW
PONDERING AUTHORSHIP - A SYMPTOM OF A DEEPER MALAISE
1 8
79 26 195 136 1995 ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 30():213-250
Dalton MS
Refereeing of scholarly works for primary publishing
1 4
80 6 11 139 1995 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 311(7009):826-826
SMITH R; RENNIE D
AND NOW, EVIDENCE BASED EDITING - THE 3RD CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW WILL BE IN PRAGUE IN SEPTEMBER 1997
1 7
# LCR NCR Nodes / Authors / Date LCS GCS
81 3 13 145 1996 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19(3):534-&
Cicchetti DV
Peer review: Agreement and disagreement - Response
1 1
82 14 64 156 1996 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 18(1):3-28
Dirk L
From laboratory to scientific literature - The life and death of biomedical research results
1 1
83 10 22 167 1998 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 173():110-113
Howard L; Wilkinson G
Peer review and editorial decision-making
1 7
84 6 15 193 2001 ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):911-914
Shea JA; Caelleigh AS; Pangaro L; Steinecke A
Review process
1 1
85 4 15 196 2001 LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(2):85-91
van Rooyen S
The evaluation of peer-review quality
1 1
86 4 16 208 2002 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 9(2):105-108
Ludbrook J
Peer review of manuscripts
1 5
87 1 1 9 1985 LANCET 2(8468):1340-1340
[Anon]
EDITORS DECISIONS
0 0
88 2 4 14 1986 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 292(6526):1017-1017
MOULD SM
ANALYSIS OF AUTHORSHIP
0 5
89 1 4 16 1986 CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 134(6):570-571
MORGAN PP
GENERAL MEDICAL JOURNALS - BECOMING LEARNED WITH LITTLE EFFORT
0 0
90 5 78 17 1986 CURRENT CONTENTS (32):3-12
GARFIELD E
REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .2. THE RESEARCH ON REFEREEING AND ALTERNATIVES TO THE PRESENT SYSTEM
0 0
# LCR NCR Nodes / Authors / Date LCS GCS
91 1 1 18 1986 DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY 28(4):415-416
BAX M
IMAGINATION AND PEER REVIEWING
0 0
92 1 6 20 1986 JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 75(1):1-1
BOOTS SG
THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF AUTHORS
0 1
93 3 3 22 1986 LANCET 2(8516):1171-1171
[Anon]
PEERING INTO PEER-REVIEW
0 0
94 1 20 24 1987 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 77(3):271-273
YANKAUER A
EDITORS REPORT - ON DECISIONS AND AUTHORSHIPS
0 8
95 3 12 26 1987 BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 295(6599):656-659
NEWCOMBE RG
TOWARDS A REDUCTION IN PUBLICATION BIAS
0 38
96 2 11 28 1987 CURRENT CONTENTS (2):3-9
GARFIELD E
WHICH MEDICAL JOURNALS HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACT
0 0
97 2 21 29 1987 CURRENT CONTENTS (7):3-12
GARFIELD E
THE 101 MOST-CITED PAPERS FROM THE BRITISH-MEDICAL-JOURNAL HIGHLIGHT THE IMPORTANT ROLE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY IN MEDICINE
0 0
98 1 1 30 1987 ISIS 78(294):649-650
WOOLF P
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
0 0
99 1 1 31 1987 JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY 9(1):1-1
LASK B
PEER-REVIEW AND ANONYMITY
0 0
100 1 1 33 1987 LIBRARY QUARTERLY 57(3):330-331
WELLER AC
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
0 0

Page  1 :  1   2   3
Generated by: HistCite(Vlad). Version: 2004.05.14