The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20091216033346/http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu:80/histcomp/lock-difficult-bal_2/index-lcs.html
#
| LCR
| NCR
| Nodes
/
Authors
/
Date
| LCS
| GCS
|
---|
1
| 0
|
| 8
1985
Book 1(1):1-
Lock S
A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine
| 204
| 204
|
2
| 3
| 60
| 7
1982
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 5(2):187-195
PETERS DP; CECI SJ
PEER-REVIEW PRACTICES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNALS - THE FATE OF ACCEPTED, PUBLISHED ARTICLES, SUBMITTED AGAIN
| 37
| 232
|
3
| 1
| 65
| 2
1971
MINERVA 9(1):66-100
ZUCKERMAN H; MERTON RK
PATTERNS OF EVALUATION IN SCIENCE - INSTITUTIONALISATION, STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF REFEREE SYSTEM
| 33
| 288
|
4
| 6
| 14
| 79
1990
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1371-1376
MCNUTT RA; EVANS AT; FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
| 33
| 104
|
5
| 4
| 28
| 10
1985
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 312(10):654-657
BAILAR JC; PATTERSON K
JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW - THE NEED FOR A RESEARCH AGENDA
| 29
| 63
|
6
| 1
| 4
| 3
1974
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 56(5):686-692
INGELFINGER FJ
PEER REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION
| 27
| 76
|
7
| 0
| 5
| 6
1981
SCIENCE 214(4523):881-886
COLE S; COLE JR; SIMON GA
CHANCE AND CONSENSUS IN PEER-REVIEW
| 20
| 142
|
8
| 0
| 24
| 82
1990
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1438-1441
HORROBIN DF
THE PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS OF PEER-REVIEW AND THE SUPPRESSION OF INNOVATION
| 20
| 99
|
9
| 3
| 8
| 19
1986
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 256(17):2391-2392
RENNIE D
GUARDING THE GUARDIANS - A CONFERENCE ON EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
| 19
| 47
|
10
| 1
| 17
| 5
1978
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION 61(6):1697-1701
WILSON JD
70TH ANNUAL-MEETING OF AMERICAN-SOCIETY-FOR-CLINICAL-INVESTIGATION, SAN-FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, 30 APRIL 1978 - PRESIDENTIAL-ADDRESS
| 18
| 46
|
#
| LCR
| NCR
| Nodes
/
Authors
/
Date
| LCS
| GCS
|
---|
11
| 0
|
| 4
1977
Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 161-175 1(2):161-175
MAHONEY MJ
Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system
| 15
| 197
|
12
| 3
| 14
| 127
1994
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):96-97
KASSIRER JP; CAMPION EW
PEER-REVIEW - CRUDE AND UNDERSTUDIED, BUT INDISPENSABLE
| 15
| 50
|
13
| 6
| 11
| 70
1990
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1317-1317
RENNIE D
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION - THE 1ST-INTERNATIONAL-CONGRESS
| 14
| 48
|
14
| 0
| 22
| 1
1967
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST 2(4):195-201
CRANE D
GATEKEEPERS OF SCIENCE - SOME FACTORS AFFECTING SELECTION OF ARTICLES FOR SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS
| 12
| 162
|
15
| 1
| 7
| 71
1990
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1321-1322
KRONICK DA
PEER-REVIEW IN 18TH-CENTURY SCIENTIFIC JOURNALISM
| 11
| 35
|
16
| 1
| 6
| 74
1990
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1341-1343
LOCK S; SMITH J
WHAT DO PEER REVIEWERS DO
| 11
| 34
|
17
| 11
| 36
| 119
1994
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):11-21
GOODMAN SN; BERLIN J; FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH
MANUSCRIPT QUALITY BEFORE AND AFTER PEER-REVIEW AND EDITING AT ANNALS OF INTERNAL-MEDICINE
| 11
| 68
|
18
| 6
| 25
| 131
1994
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):143-146
FISHER M; FRIEDMAN SB; STRAUSS B
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW
| 11
| 42
|
19
| 6
| 12
| 173
1998
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):234-237
van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review - A randomized trial
| 11
| 42
|
20
| 1
| 8
| 75
1990
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1344-1347
WELLER AC
EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN UNITED-STATES MEDICAL JOURNALS
| 10
| 32
|
#
| LCR
| NCR
| Nodes
/
Authors
/
Date
| LCS
| GCS
|
---|
21
| 11
| 182
| 91
1991
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):119-134
CICCHETTI DV
THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION
| 10
| 80
|
22
| 4
| 20
| 27
1987
CHEST 91(2):252-255
ROBIN ED; BURKE CM
PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICAL JOURNALS
| 9
| 14
|
23
| 2
| 10
| 56
1989
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 321(12):827-829
RELMAN AS; ANGELL M
HOW GOOD IS PEER-REVIEW
| 9
| 39
|
24
| 4
| 88
| 72
1990
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1323-1329
BURNHAM JC
THE EVOLUTION OF EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
| 9
| 35
|
25
| 2
| 9
| 73
1990
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1338-1340
YANKAUER A
WHO ARE THE PEER REVIEWERS AND HOW MUCH DO THEY REVIEW
| 9
| 27
|
26
| 9
| 16
| 121
1994
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 309(6948):143-144
SMITH R
PROMOTING RESEARCH INTO PEER-REVIEW
| 8
| 28
|
27
| 3
| 27
| 39
1988
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296(6624):774-777
SMITH R
RESEARCH POLICY - PROBLEMS WITH PEER-REVIEW AND ALTERNATIVES
| 7
| 17
|
28
| 3
| 12
| 81
1990
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1390-1391
SHARP DW
WHAT CAN AND SHOULD BE DONE TO REDUCE PUBLICATION BIAS - THE PERSPECTIVE OF AN EDITOR
| 7
| 30
|
29
| 1
| 20
| 77
1990
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1355-1357
GARDNER MJ; BOND J
AN EXPLORATORY-STUDY OF STATISTICAL ASSESSMENT OF PAPERS PUBLISHED IN THE BRITISH-MEDICAL-JOURNAL
| 6
| 60
|
30
| 4
| 14
| 178
1999
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318(7175):4-5
Smith R
Opening up BMJ peer review - A beginning that should lead to complete transparency
| 6
| 23
|
#
| LCR
| NCR
| Nodes
/
Authors
/
Date
| LCS
| GCS
|
---|
31
| 2
| 12
| 11
1986
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 105(2):313-320
GARFIELD E
WHICH MEDICAL JOURNALS HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACT
| 5
| 79
|
32
| 1
| 1
| 59
1989
SCIENCE 244(4907):910-910
SUN M
FOLLOWING THE ROYAL-SOCIETY LEAD
| 5
| 0
|
33
| 2
| 16
| 76
1990
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1348-1352
HARGENS LL
VARIATION IN JOURNAL PEER-REVIEW SYSTEMS - POSSIBLE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
| 5
| 17
|
34
| 3
| 4
| 78
1990
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1369-1371
GARFUNKEL JM; ULSHEN MH; HAMRICK HJ; LAWSON EE
PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED BY SECONDARY REVIEW OF ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPTS
| 5
| 28
|
35
| 5
| 14
| 130
1994
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):139-142
GILBERT JR; WILLIAMS ES; LUNDBERG GD
IS THERE GENDER BIAS IN JAMAS PEER-REVIEW PROCESS
| 5
| 25
|
36
| 3
| 41
| 25
1987
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 52(5):631-642
BAKANIC V; MCPHAIL C; SIMON RJ
THE MANUSCRIPT REVIEW AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
| 4
| 33
|
37
| 1
| 8
| 36
1988
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 109(3):181-181
RENNIE D; KNOLL E
INVESTIGATING PEER-REVIEW
| 4
| 8
|
38
| 5
| 9
| 43
1988
DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY 22(7-8):601-602
CLEARY JD; ALEXANDER B
BLIND VERSUS NONBLIND REVIEW - SURVEY OF SELECTED MEDICAL JOURNALS
| 4
| 13
|
39
| 3
| 20
| 102
1992
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 116(11):912-919
WILKES MS; DOBLIN BH; SHAPIRO MF
PHARMACEUTICAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN LEADING MEDICAL JOURNALS - EXPERTS ASSESSMENTS
| 3
| 116
|
40
| 3
| 27
| 112
1993
ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION IN ENGLISH 32(2):234-238
DANIEL HD
AN EVALUATION OF THE PEER-REVIEW PROCESS AT ANGEWANDTE-CHEMIE
| 3
| 8
|
#
| LCR
| NCR
| Nodes
/
Authors
/
Date
| LCS
| GCS
|
---|
41
| 7
| 24
| 120
1994
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 121(1):60-61
LOCK S
DOES EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW WORK
| 3
| 11
|
42
| 7
| 20
| 123
1994
CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH 28(8):1134-1139
FABIATO A
ANONYMITY OF REVIEWERS
| 3
| 13
|
43
| 2
| 15
| 128
1994
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):105-107
ABBY M; MASSEY MD; GALANDIUK S; POLK HC
PEER-REVIEW IS AN EFFECTIVE SCREENING PROCESS TO EVALUATE MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS
| 3
| 17
|
44
| 3
| 10
| 165
1998
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 128(1):66-68
Davidoff F
Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded
| 3
| 15
|
45
| 5
| 10
| 207
2002
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287(21):2759-2760
Rennie D
Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication
| 3
| 19
|
46
| 1
| 4
| 12
1986
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 292(6521):646-646
MORGAN P
PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICAL JOURNALS
| 2
| 3
|
47
| 1
| 21
| 13
1986
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 292(6523):810-812
GARDNER MJ; MACHIN D; CAMPBELL MJ
USE OF CHECK LISTS IN ASSESSING THE STATISTICAL CONTENT OF MEDICAL STUDIES
| 2
| 81
|
48
| 1
| 13
| 15
1986
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 293(6546):550-552
MARTIN B
BIAS IN AWARDING RESEARCH GRANTS
| 2
| 5
|
49
| 3
| 25
| 37
1988
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296(6620):484-488
SMITH R
RESEARCH POLICY - PEERING INTO THE BOWELS OF THE MRC .1. SETTING PRIORITIES
| 2
| 12
|
50
| 3
| 11
| 38
1988
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 296(6621):556-560
SMITH R
PEERING INTO THE BOWELS OF THE MRC .2. REVIEW SYSTEMS
| 2
| 5
|
#
| LCR
| NCR
| Nodes
/
Authors
/
Date
| LCS
| GCS
|
---|
51
| 3
| 94
| 65
1990
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 113(4):317-325
FYE WB
MEDICAL AUTHORSHIP - TRADITIONS, TRENDS, AND TRIBULATIONS
| 2
| 34
|
52
| 4
| 48
| 66
1990
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 301(6754):756-759
SMITH J
JOURNALOLOGY - OR WHAT EDITORS DO
| 2
| 6
|
53
| 1
| 1
| 80
1990
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 263(10):1376-1378
GARFUNKEL JM; LAWSON EE; HAMRICK HJ; ULSHEN MH
EFFECT OF ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION ON THE AUTHORS EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW OF MEDICAL MANUSCRIPTS
| 2
| 9
|
54
| 3
| 11
| 103
1992
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 116(11):951-952
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
PHARMACEUTICAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN MEDICAL JOURNALS
| 2
| 26
|
55
| 1
| 31
| 108
1992
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 232(3):223-228
FLETCHER SW; FLETCHER RH
RESPONSIBILITIES OF MEDICAL JOURNALS TO READERS
| 2
| 6
|
56
| 7
| 27
| 113
1993
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 306(6893):1668-1672
GILLETT R; HARROW J
PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICAL-RESEARCH .1. MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE MEDICAL-RESEARCH-COUNCIL
| 2
| 12
|
57
| 3
| 5
| 129
1994
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272(2):137-138
GARFUNKEL JM; ULSHEN MH; HAMRICK HJ; LAWSON EE
EFFECT OF INSTITUTIONAL PRESTIGE ON REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND EDITORIAL DECISIONS
| 2
| 13
|
58
| 7
| 14
| 132
1994
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION 93(5):1877-1880
SCHARSCHMIDT BF; DEAMICIS A; BACCHETTI P; HELD MJ
CHANCE, CONCURRENCE, AND CLUSTERING - ANALYSIS OF REVIEWERS RECOMMENDATIONS ON 1,000 SUBMISSIONS TO THE JOURNAL-OF-CLINICAL-INVESTIGATION
| 2
| 11
|
59
| 2
| 328
| 134
1994
TEXAS LAW REVIEW 72(4):715-802
BLACK B; AYALA FJ; SAFFRANBRINKS C
SCIENCE AND THE LAW IN THE WAKE OF DAUBERT - A NEW SEARCH FOR SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE
| 2
| 49
|
60
| 6
| 10
| 142
1995
JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 10(3):255-256
RIGGS JE
PRIORITY, RIVALRY, AND PEER-REVIEW
| 2
| 5
|
#
| LCR
| NCR
| Nodes
/
Authors
/
Date
| LCS
| GCS
|
---|
61
| 1
| 3
| 154
1996
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE 25(2):102-104
Frank E
Editors' requests of peer reviewers: A study and a proposal
| 2
| 7
|
62
| 12
| 37
| 155
1996
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE 26(5):883-886
Wessely S
What do we know about peer review?
| 2
| 6
|
63
| 9
| 33
| 172
1998
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280(3):214-215
Rennie D
Peer review in Prague
| 2
| 11
|
64
| 3
| 34
| 21
1986
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE 79(11):639-645
SHEPHERD M
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE REDIVIVUS - CONCEPT AND COMMUNICATION
| 1
| 4
|
65
| 1
| 1
| 23
1986
NATURE 322(6074):24-25
HARNAD S
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
| 1
| 5
|
66
| 6
| 41
| 32
1987
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY 2(2):165-176
MAHONEY MJ
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION AND KNOWLEDGE POLITICS
| 1
| 28
|
67
| 1
| 9
| 40
1988
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 297(6642):156-156
LOCK S
STRUCTURED ABSTRACTS - NOW REQUIRED FOR ALL PAPERS REPORTING CLINICAL-TRIALS
| 1
| 15
|
68
| 1
| 4
| 47
1988
SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 19(2):109-115
BANNER JM
PRESERVING THE INTEGRITY OF PEER-REVIEW
| 1
| 13
|
69
| 1
| 2
| 60
1989
SCIENTIST 3(6):9-&
HERXHEIMER A
MAKE SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS MORE RESPONSIVE - AND RESPONSIBLE
| 1
| 5
|
70
| 1
| 9
| 62
1990
ANNALS OF ALLERGY 64(1):1-2
SLY RM
FACILITATION OF COMMUNICATION THROUGH UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS
| 1
| 3
|
#
| LCR
| NCR
| Nodes
/
Authors
/
Date
| LCS
| GCS
|
---|
71
| 5
| 39
| 88
1990
SCIENTOMETRICS 19(1-2):91-106
HARGENS LL; HERTING JR
NEGLECTED CONSIDERATIONS IN THE ANALYSIS OF AGREEMENT AMONG JOURNAL REFEREES
| 1
| 5
|
72
| 1
| 4
| 92
1991
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 14(1):146-146
FLETCHER JM
JOURNAL AVAILABILITY AND THE QUALITY OF PUBLISHED RESEARCH
| 1
| 2
|
73
| 7
| 29
| 96
1991
JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY 6(3):193-195
BRUMBACK RA
PUBLISHING IN BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS - THE SYSTEM IN REVIEW
| 1
| 2
|
74
| 1
| 16
| 101
1991
SURGERY 110(1):1-7
SIMMONS RL; POLK HC; WILLIAMS B; MAVROUDIS C
MISCONDUCT AND FRAUD IN RESEARCH - SOCIAL AND LEGISLATIVE ISSUES SYMPOSIUM OF THE SOCIETY OF UNIVERSITY SURGEONS
| 1
| 3
|
75
| 4
| 24
| 107
1992
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 232(3):215-221
FLETCHER RH; FLETCHER SW
MEDICAL JOURNALS AND SOCIETY - THREATS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
| 1
| 7
|
76
| 1
| 28
| 110
1992
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES 13(4):393-399
EYSENCK HJ; EYSENCK SBG
PEER-REVIEW - ADVICE TO REFEREES AND CONTRIBUTORS
| 1
| 4
|
77
| 7
| 47
| 122
1994
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 150(8):1211-1216
HUSTON P
INFORMATION FOR PEER REVIEWERS
| 1
| 3
|
78
| 1
| 30
| 135
1995
ANAESTHESIA 50(6):485-487
GOODMAN NW
PONDERING AUTHORSHIP - A SYMPTOM OF A DEEPER MALAISE
| 1
| 8
|
79
| 26
| 195
| 136
1995
ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 30():213-250
Dalton MS
Refereeing of scholarly works for primary publishing
| 1
| 4
|
80
| 6
| 11
| 139
1995
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 311(7009):826-826
SMITH R; RENNIE D
AND NOW, EVIDENCE BASED EDITING - THE 3RD CONGRESS ON PEER-REVIEW WILL BE IN PRAGUE IN SEPTEMBER 1997
| 1
| 7
|
#
| LCR
| NCR
| Nodes
/
Authors
/
Date
| LCS
| GCS
|
---|
81
| 3
| 13
| 145
1996
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 19(3):534-&
Cicchetti DV
Peer review: Agreement and disagreement - Response
| 1
| 1
|
82
| 14
| 64
| 156
1996
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION 18(1):3-28
Dirk L
From laboratory to scientific literature - The life and death of biomedical research results
| 1
| 1
|
83
| 10
| 22
| 167
1998
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 173():110-113
Howard L; Wilkinson G
Peer review and editorial decision-making
| 1
| 7
|
84
| 6
| 15
| 193
2001
ACADEMIC MEDICINE 76(9):911-914
Shea JA; Caelleigh AS; Pangaro L; Steinecke A
Review process
| 1
| 1
|
85
| 4
| 15
| 196
2001
LEARNED PUBLISHING 14(2):85-91
van Rooyen S
The evaluation of peer-review quality
| 1
| 1
|
86
| 4
| 16
| 208
2002
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 9(2):105-108
Ludbrook J
Peer review of manuscripts
| 1
| 5
|
87
| 1
| 1
| 9
1985
LANCET 2(8468):1340-1340
[Anon]
EDITORS DECISIONS
| 0
| 0
|
88
| 2
| 4
| 14
1986
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 292(6526):1017-1017
MOULD SM
ANALYSIS OF AUTHORSHIP
| 0
| 5
|
89
| 1
| 4
| 16
1986
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 134(6):570-571
MORGAN PP
GENERAL MEDICAL JOURNALS - BECOMING LEARNED WITH LITTLE EFFORT
| 0
| 0
|
90
| 5
| 78
| 17
1986
CURRENT CONTENTS (32):3-12
GARFIELD E
REFEREEING AND PEER-REVIEW .2. THE RESEARCH ON REFEREEING AND ALTERNATIVES TO THE PRESENT SYSTEM
| 0
| 0
|
#
| LCR
| NCR
| Nodes
/
Authors
/
Date
| LCS
| GCS
|
---|
91
| 1
| 1
| 18
1986
DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY 28(4):415-416
BAX M
IMAGINATION AND PEER REVIEWING
| 0
| 0
|
92
| 1
| 6
| 20
1986
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 75(1):1-1
BOOTS SG
THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF AUTHORS
| 0
| 1
|
93
| 3
| 3
| 22
1986
LANCET 2(8516):1171-1171
[Anon]
PEERING INTO PEER-REVIEW
| 0
| 0
|
94
| 1
| 20
| 24
1987
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 77(3):271-273
YANKAUER A
EDITORS REPORT - ON DECISIONS AND AUTHORSHIPS
| 0
| 8
|
95
| 3
| 12
| 26
1987
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 295(6599):656-659
NEWCOMBE RG
TOWARDS A REDUCTION IN PUBLICATION BIAS
| 0
| 38
|
96
| 2
| 11
| 28
1987
CURRENT CONTENTS (2):3-9
GARFIELD E
WHICH MEDICAL JOURNALS HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACT
| 0
| 0
|
97
| 2
| 21
| 29
1987
CURRENT CONTENTS (7):3-12
GARFIELD E
THE 101 MOST-CITED PAPERS FROM THE BRITISH-MEDICAL-JOURNAL HIGHLIGHT THE IMPORTANT ROLE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY IN MEDICINE
| 0
| 0
|
98
| 1
| 1
| 30
1987
ISIS 78(294):649-650
WOOLF P
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
| 0
| 0
|
99
| 1
| 1
| 31
1987
JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY 9(1):1-1
LASK B
PEER-REVIEW AND ANONYMITY
| 0
| 0
|
100
| 1
| 1
| 33
1987
LIBRARY QUARTERLY 57(3):330-331
WELLER AC
A DIFFICULT BALANCE - EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW IN MEDICINE - LOCK,S
| 0
| 0
|