한국   대만   중국   일본 
? Sarkozy Confirms France Will Rejoin NATO | Sweetness & Light
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20080618161517/http://sweetness-light.com:80/archive/sarkozy-confirms-france-will-rejoin-nato

     « $2.5M Doesn’t Keep Gangbanger From Pals | Main | AP Calls Leftwing Tax Report ‘Non-Partisan’ »     


Sarkozy Confirms France Will Rejoin NATO

From France’s AFP :

Sarkozy overhauls the military as France plans return to NATO

by Carole Landry

PARIS, June 17, 2008 (AFP) - President Nicolas Sarkozy on Tuesday launched a major overhaul of the French military, cutting back the armed forces, beefing up intelligence and setting a course for France’s return to NATO command.

A leaner, more mobile and high-tech military will allow France to confront new threats, in particular terrorism which poses the greatest danger, Sarkozy said in an address to some 3,000 officers in Paris.

Bringing France closer to the United States on defence, Sarkozy confirmed that France will soon return to NATO’s integrated command, which it left in 1966 when Charles de Gaulle rejected US dominance of the alliance .

"Today, the most immediate threat is that of a terrorist attack", said the president in a defining speech as commander-in-chief.

"The threat is there, it is real and we know that it can tomorrow take on a new form, even more serious, with nuclear, chemical and biological means," he said .

To face up to the threat, Sarkozy announced a "massive investment effort in intelligence" to make use of satellites, drones and other airborne surveillance equipment…

Sarkozy stressed that France would remain "an independent ally" and keep its nuclear deterrent forces under strict national control when it re-joins NATO command, which officials have said is expected to take place in 2009…

Rejoining the military command is seen mostly as a symbolic gesture that would entail the appointment of several French generals to NATO military headquarters and to the alliance’s defence planning committee.

But opposition leftists have criticized the move, saying it confirms a shift toward a pro-US stance under Sarkozy’s leadership and a loss of independence that has been a hallmark of French foreign policy for decades .

France will spend a total of 377 billion euros (583 billion dollars) from 2009 to 2020 on defence including 200 billion euros on new equipment, said Sarkozy. As of 2012, the military budget will increase, he said.

The new security doctrine followed the release on Monday of the first review in 14 years of the French military in a white paper drafted by a blue-ribbon panel of 35 experts.

With the largest army in the European Union, France for the first time made homeland security part of its defence strategy to confront threats from terrorism, cyber-attacks and natural disasters…

More good news from the greatest Frenchman since Brigitte Bardot.

But opposition leftists have criticized the move, saying it confirms a shift toward a pro-US stance under Sarkozy’s leadership and a loss of independence that has been a hallmark of French foreign policy for decades.

And by "independence" the left means being in lockstep with any and all enemies of the United States.

But now where are the Chablis and brie crowd going to move?

Related Articles:

  Print Email

4 Responses to “Sarkozy Confirms France Will Rejoin NATO”

  1. texaspsue

    Wow! Sarkozy gets the big picture and realizes the threat we all face. Another European ally officially announcing that they are standing firm on the war against the terrorists. Way to go! And to think the MSM is trying to portray President Bush’s trip to Europe as uneffective.

  2. Arctain

    Vive le Sarkozy!
    Vive le Bush!

  3. Sharps Rifle

    This could have some very positive effects, not the least of which would be to improve the reputation of the French military. The average French soldier may be a good, brave fighting man (okay, Foreign Legionnaire…the rest of the French Army still has a tendency to surrender first and ask questions later…), but their officers have proven to be this side of worthless for close to 200 years. After all, when you get beaten by the Mexicans (the Juaristas beat the French like a rented mule…THAT’S embarassment for ya!), then the Germans three times in a row (Franco-German War of 1870, WWI, WWII), the Vietnamese (and that took some serious incompetance…what IDIOT places his defenses in a valley???? Rule No. 1 of ground warfare: TAKE THE HIGH GROUND!!! Yes, I refer to Dien Bien Phu) and the Arabs (Algeria…if you lose to the people that Israel beats the snot out of on a regular basis, then you KNOW you have incompetant leaders both militarily and politically), and your greatest military hero wasn’t even from France or ethnically French (Napoleon…from Corsica and was ethnically Italian), you better do some rebuilding and fast!

    If French officers can oversome their somewhat undeserved arrogance and attend NATO training (I’d especially recommend the US Army Command and Staff School), then possibly have French units take part in training at Fort Irwin, there’s probability for the French armed forces to be somewhat less of an expensive joke, and actually become a fighting force. Frankly, I’d love to see the Aggressor Squadrons at Nellis wax the butts of those Mirage jockeys of the Armee’ de l’Aire! That’d be worth going back into the service for alone!

    Sarkozy is onto something…and frankly, I’d enjoy it if the French jokes I just made could become a thing of the past. We need allies, GOOD allies, and it’d be nice if the French would be among those for a change.

  4. artboyusa

    Vive la France! About time, too…Sharps makes some good points but to be fair, at Dien Bien Phu the French needed an airstrip to resupply the place and you can’t put an airstrip on a mountaintop, so a valley it had to be. Their mistake was in underestimating their enemy and assuming that the Viets (a) had no heavy artillery and (b) even if they did, they couldn’t get it over the mountains and (c) that even if that happened, French counterbattery fire would deal with it. Wrong, wrong and wrong again. “The Last Valley” is an excellent recent account, even better than Bernard Fall’s “Hell in a Very Small Place” classic, IMHO.


Leave a Reply

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.


« Front Page | To Top
« $2.5M Doesn’t Keep Gangbanger From Pals | AP Calls Leftwing Tax Report ‘Non-Partisan’ »