한국   대만   중국   일본 
Tamilarasan of TNLA (Tamil Nadu Liberation Army)
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20011006104457/http://www.geocities.com:80/tamiltribune/01/0802.html

Tamilarasan of TNLA Tamil Nadu Liberation Army

How was Commander Tamilarasan Killed?

K. T.

TAMIL TRIBUNE, August 2001 (ID.2001-08-02)

http://www.geocities.com/tamiltribune/

Definitions :
Hindians: People whose mother tongue is Hindi; much of Uttar Pradesh , Madya Pradesh and some surrounding areas in northern India is their homeland. Hindian politicians control and dominate the Indian government because they form the single largest block in the Indian parliament.

Abbreviations

TNLA - Tamil Nadu Liberation Army

Outline

1. Introduction

2. Some Background Information

3. Mainline Newspaper Accounts

4. An Independent Report

5. A Reality Check: Which Report is True?

6. Why didn't Indian Intelligence Agents Open Fire?

7. Why didn't Tamilarasan Group Open Fire?

8. Final Remarks

1 . Introduction

Tamilarasan was the founder of Tamil Nadu Liberation Army (TNLA), known in Tamil as Tamil Nadu Viduthalai Padai (some newspapers also call it Tamilar Viduthai Padai or Tamilar Liberation Army). Tamilarasan believed that independence of Tamil Nadu from Indian rule is essential for the betterment of the people of Tamil Nadu and that armed struggle is necessary to achieve independence.  He was killed in 1987 but the TNLA he founded is still active in Tamil Nadu. 

During the last several months (last few months of 2000 and the first few months of 2001) TNLA was in the news a lot in connection with the kidnapping and later voluntary release of Kannada actor Rajkumar. There were some passing remarks (usually a line or two) about the circumstances under which TNLA founder Tamilarasan was killed on September 1, 1987 in Ponparappi. What has appeared in the mass media is not the whole truth. They seem to be based on police reports. There is an  independent report by a Tamil Group that investigated the killing; they seem to give the complete and truthful picture of what happened on that fateful day. I present here both versions and my arguments as to which version is more likely to be the complete truth. Let the reader be the judge.

2. Some Background Information

It is necessary to provide some background information in order to understand the happenings of September 1, 1987.

Tamailarasan founded the Tamil Nadu Liberation Army (Tamil Nadu Viduthalai Padai) (TNLA) in the mid-1980s to fight for the liberation of Tamil Nadu from Indian rule. He attracted some able young men to his group. TNLA robbed Indian Government owned  banks to fund its operations and raided police stations to get guns. They never harmed bank employees or customers during robberies. TNLA often distributed some of the stolen money to people and Tamilarsan and his group was very popular among local people, including people of Ponparappi where he hailed from. They respected Tamilarasan and his group to the extent that villagers sometimes took their disputes to TNLA for arbitration. They knew that TNLA would issue a fair ruling.

Now let us see what happened on the day Tamilarasan was killed.

3. Mainline Newspaper Accounts

The mass-circulation mainline newspapers and magazines publish a line or two about how Tamilarsan was killed. Typically they read like "Tamilarasan was lynched by Ponparappi villagers when he and his gang tried to rob the bank". These news items are based on information from the police.

4. An Independent Report

I had the occasion to read an independent report prepared by a Tamil Group. Here is what the report said.

TNLA decided to rob the Indian Government owned State Bank of India branch at Ponparappi village. Indian intelligence agents came to know of this and went to Ponparappi dressed as common villagers and waited near the bank to ambush the TNLA men.

Tamilarasan and four others, each armed with guns and in disguise, went to the Ponparappi branch of the State Bank of India. The plain-clothed Indian intelligence agents ambushed them, beat them and killed them. Tamilarasan and his four companions thought that they were in fact villagers and so did not open fire on the "villagers". They did not fire a single shot. (It is well known that Tamilarasan never harmed bank employees or customers during bank robberies.) Then police came and filed a report that local villagers lynched Tamilarasan and the four TNLA men.

5. A Reality Check: Which Report is True?

I was not there. So I cannot say which one of the two reports is true from personal knowledge. Ponparappi villagers would never publicly contradict the police version. They know what would happen if anyone did. They would be falsely charged as accomplices to Tamilarasan, and sent to prison. Everyone knows what happened to local tribals in the Sathyamangalam forest area who did not "fully cooperate" with police operations against Veerappan there. They were charged as accomplices to Veerappan and are still languishing in prison for more than four years awaiting trial (yes, it is more than four years and they did not have an opportunity to prove their innocence in a court of law.). So Ponparappi villagers would not publicly say anything contradicting the police version of how Tamilarsan and the four TNLA men were killed. The independent report by the Tamil Group was based on confidential conversations with people in that area.

Let us examine the two reports rationally and determine which one is more likely to be true. Remember, police does not always tell the truth and police reports are not always true. The many murders of freedom fighters in custody in Punjab and reporting them as killings during shootouts in the process of arresting them are ample evidence of police making false reports. The recent (June 2001) arrest of former Chief Minister Karunanidhi and his claim that police report on the manner of his arrests is false is another example; either the former Chief Minister and two Indian Government Ministers (Murasoli Maran and T. R. Balu) were lying or senior police officers making the arrest were lying. So everything coming out from government sources is not necessarily true. So when evaluating the two versions (Section 3 and 4) of how Tamilarasan was killed, keep an open mind.

According to mainline newspapers (based on the police version), five bank robbers, each carrying a gun, were chased by a group of unarmed villagers and beaten to death. Let us make a reality check of this account. Will unarmed villagers go after five armed gunmen risking their lives? Extremely unlikely. Have we ever heard of a situation in India where villagers attacked bandits armed with guns, to protect a bank? No. It has never happened. No villager would risk his or her life for a bank; a villager may risk the life to rescue an abducted child or even to recover one's own property but no unarmed villager would or has ever gone after gunmen because they robbed a bank. It has never happened before, and it did not happen here. It is a fabricated story. 

It is now clear that villagers going after five gunmen and beating and killing them is unrealistic. However it makes sense for a group of Indian intelligence agents going to the village and waiting to ambush the TNLA men. Surely they would have been wearing bulletproof vests under their civilian clothes. They would have been special agents trained in disarming gunmen and in hand-to-hand combat. They might have blunt objects that could kill a man. In all probability they might also have concealed guns to use if their lives were in danger. Such Indian intelligence agents, trained to disarm and kill in hand-to-hand combat, laying ambush for the five gunmen and killing them makes sense; it meets our reality check.

Thus, examining both accounts, we conclude that it is not the local villagers but it is trained Indian intelligence agents in plain clothes who killed Tamilarasan and the four TNLA men.

6. Why didn't the Indian Intelligence Agents Open Fire?

Why didn't the Indian intelligence agents laying in wait for the TNLA cadres shoot at them instead of engaging in hand to hand combat? As we stated before, Tamilarasan was very popular in Ponparappi and nearby areas. They were well respected.  Indian Government, which sent the intelligence agents to lay in ambush, did not want the Tamil people to know that TNLA was popular with local people. They did not want newspapers to report that Tamilarasan, who was popular with the local people, was killed in a gun battle with Indian intelligence agents. That would create a martyr and a hero of Tamilarasan. Tamil nationalist youth may join the TNLA in larger numbers. So the intelligence agents wanted to make Tamilarasan  look like an ordinary criminal, hated and killed by local villagers. That was the reason for the intelligence agents to act like local villagers. It is not at all uncommon for intelligence agencies to use "ingenious tactics" to destroy the reputation of popular anti-government groups. Forged documents, made-up crimes (intelligence agents commit the crime and blame the anti-government groups) and false propaganda are all parts of the bags of tricks used by intelligence agencies around the world. to smirch the reputation of popular anti-government movements. What happened on September 1, 1987 in Ponparappi was yet another incidence of such trickery.

7. Why didn't Tamilarasan Group Open Fire?

The mainline newspaper reports do not say a word about the fact that the TNLA men did not open fire even as unarmed men beat and killed them. They all had guns. Why didn't they open fire on these unarmed people attacking them? Tamilarasan was a true humanitarian. During bank robberies he made every effort not to harm bank employees or other innocent bystanders. No one was ever hurt in previous robberies. He thought that the people who were attacking his group were local villagers and did not want to shoot at them although they could have easily done that. Even in those last minutes of their lives, he and the TNLA men with him chose to sacrifice their own lives than to shoot at unarmed villagers (they did not know that they were intelligence agents masquerading as villagers). They did not open fire, instead chose to lay down their own lives; they sacrificed their own lives rather than shoot and kill local villagers. This is true humanitarianism.

8. Final Remarks

I presented both versions of how Tamilarasan and the four TNLA men were killed on September 1, 1987 at Ponparappi. Let the readers decide which version is true. The one published in mainline newspapers on the basis of police report or the independent report by the Tamil Group? To me, the latter seems to withstand the reality check. As they say, "you can fool some of the people some of the time but not all of the people all of the time!"

Let truth prevail!

THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE MAY INTEREST YOU:

Why Independence (Freedom) for Tamil Nadu from Indian Rule? (by Thanjai Nalankilli ), TAMIL TRIBUNE, April 1999

(NOTE:  The name Tamilarasan  is sometimes spelled as Thamilarasan , Thamizharasan or Tamizharasan .)

Your comments on this article or any other matter relating to Tamil are welcome

( e-mail to : tamiltribune at asia.com Please replace " at " with the @ sign .)

Copyright ? 2001 by TAMIL TRIBUNE. All rights reserved. No part of this article should be copied or distributed in any form by any means without written permission from TAMIL TRIBUNE. Those interested in re-publishing this article read http://www.geocities.com/tamiltribune/gen/permit.html for details or e-mail us.

TT

1