Epicurus

Epicurus
Epicurus
	T??ng ban than La Ma kh?c h?a chan dung Epicurus
Sinh	Thang 2 n?m 341 TCN ; Samos , Hy L?p
M?t	270 TCN (th? 72 tu?i) ; Athens , Hy L?p
Th?i k?	Tri?t h?c th?i k? Hy L?p hoa
Vung	Tri?t h?c ph??ng Tay
Tr??ng phai	Ch? ngh?a Epicurus
đ?i t??ng chinh	Luan ly h?c ; Nh?n th?c lu?n ; V?t ly ; Th?n h?c ;
T? t??ng n?i b?t	Aponia ; Ataraxia ; H??ng l?c "đ?ng" va "t?nh" ; ; đ??c gan cho ong : Ngh?ch ly Epicurus ;
	?nh h??ng b?i Democritus , Platon , Aristoteles , Aristippus , Pyrrho , Nausiphanes ;
	?nh h??ng t?i Seneca , Hermarchus , Diogenes x? Oenoanda , Lucretius , Friedrich Nietzsche , Jeremy Bentham , John Stuart Mill , Baruch Spinoza , Thomas Hobbes , Thomas Jefferson , Karl Marx , Isaac Newton , Voltaire , Metrodorus , David Hume , Jean-Jacques Rousseau , Philodemus , Gassendi , Jun Tsuji ;

Epicurus ( Ti?ng Hy L?p : ?π?κουρο?) (sinh n?m 341 tr??c CN t?i Samos - m?t 270 tr??c CN t?i Athens ) la m?t nha tri?t h?c Hy L?p c? đ?i, ng??i đa khai sinh ra Thuy?t Epicurean , m?t tr??ng phai t? t??ng n?i ti?ng trong tri?t h?c v?n hoa Hy L?p c? đ?i keo dai đ?n 600 n?m. Trong s? h?n 300 tac ph?m c?a Epicurus thi ch? con m?t s? it con sot l?i va duy tri đ?n ngay nay; ph?n l?n cai g?i la Thuy?t Epicurean b?t ngu?n t? cac h?c gi? va nha binh lu?n sau nay.

V?i Epicurus, m?c đich c?a tri?t h?c la duy tri h?nh phuc, m?t cu?c s?ng thanh binh ma khong co n?i đau va s? s? hai (đ??c bi?u th? b?i aponia), la s?ng m?t cu?c s?ng t? t?i cung nh?ng ng??i b?n xung quanh. Epicurus d?y r?ng ni?m vui va n?i đau la nh?ng th??c đo c?a đi?u t?t va đi?u x?u, cai ch?t la s? ch?m d?t c?a th? xac va tam h?n, vi v?y cai ch?t khong đang s?, ong c?ng ch? r?ng nh?ng v? chua tr?i khong ban th??ng hay tr?ng ph?t con ng??i, Trai đ?t la vo t?n va v?nh c?u, va cac s? ki?n tren Trai đ?t r?t cu?c đ?u d?a vao nh?ng s? v?n đ?ng c?ng nh? s? tac đ?ng qua l?i l?n nhau c?a cac nguyen t? di chuy?n quanh kho?ng khong r?ng.

Ti?u s? [ s?a | s?a ma ngu?n ]

Cha m? ong, Neocles va Chaerestrate, c? hai đ?u sinh ra ? Athen , va cha c?a ong la cong dan, đa di c? đ?n khu đ?nh c? c?a ng??i Athen tren đ?o Samos ? bi?n Aegean m??i n?m tr??c khi sinh Epicuros c?a vao thang 2 n?m 341 TCN. ^[2] Khi la m?t c?u be, ong nghien c?u tri?t h?c b?n n?m d??i s? ch? b?o c?a th?y giao theo tr??ng phai Plato la Pamphilus. ? tu?i 18 ong đa đi đ?n Athens cho th?i gian hai n?m ph?c v? trong quan đ?i. Nha so?n k?ch Menander ph?c v? trong cung đ? tu?i c?a ephebos nh? Epicurus.

Sau khi Alexandros đ?i đ? qua đ?i, Perdiccas tr?c xu?t nh?ng ng??i đ?nh c? Athena ? Samos t?i Colophon , tren b? bi?n ngay nay la Th? Nh? K? . Sau khi hoan thanh ngh?a v? quan s?, Epicurus gia nh?p v?i gia đinh minh ? đo. Ong h?c t?p d??i s? d?y b?o c?a Nausiphanes , ng??i theo giao ly c?a Democritos . Trong n?m 311/310 TCN Epicurus d?y h?c ? Mytilene , nh?ng gay ra xung đ?t va bu?c ph?i ra đi. Sau đo ong thanh l?p m?t tr??ng h?c ? Lampsacus tr??c khi tr? l?i Athens n?m 306 tr??c Cong nguyen. ? đo, ong thanh l?p Khu V??n, m?t tr??ng h?c đ?t ten theo khu v??n c?a ong s? h?u kho?ng gi?a Stoa va H?c vi?n ma đ??c dung nh? la n?i g?p g? c?a tr??ng.

M?c du nhi?u giao ly c?a ong b? ?nh h??ng nhi?u b?i cac nha t? t??ng tr??c đo, đ?c bi?t la c?a Democritos , ong đa co s? khac bi?t m?t cach đang k? v?i Democritus v? cac ly lu?n. Epicurus th??ng ph? nh?n đi?u ?nh h??ng nay.

Epicurus khong bao gi? k?t hon va khong co con. Ong b? s?i th?n, ^[3] ma ong cu?i cung đa qua đ?i vi c?n b?nh nay n?m 270 tr??c Cong nguyen ^[4] ? tu?i 72,

Hinh ?nh [ s?a | s?a ma ngu?n ]

Roman bust of Epicurus, Louvre museum
Roman bust of Metrodorus, Louvre museum
Roman bust of Metrodorus, Pergamon museum, Berlin

Roman copy after a Greek original, palazzo Massimo alle Terme
busto bronzeo proveniente da Ercolano
busto bronzeo proveniente da Ercolano (dettaglio)

Epicure - Lettre a Menecee (French audiobook)

Xem them [ s?a | s?a ma ngu?n ]

Ngh?ch ly Epicurus v? Cai ac

Tham kh?o [ s?a | s?a ma ngu?n ]

^ Bunnin & Yu (2004). The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy . Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
^ Apollodorus (reported by Diogenes Laertius , Lives of Eminent Philosophers , 10.14-15 ) gives his birth on the fourth day of the month February in the third year of the 109th Olympiad , in the archonship of Sosigenes
^ Maria Bitsori & Galanakis, Emmanouil (2004). “Epicurus' death”. World Journal of Urology . 22 (6): 466?469. doi : 10.1007/s00345-004-0448-2 . PMID 15372192 . Qu?n ly CS1: s? d?ng tham s? tac gi? ( lien k?t ) L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> khong h?p l?: ten “bitsori” đ??c đ?nh ro nhi?u l?n, m?i l?n co n?i dung khac
^ In the second year of the 127th Olympiad, in the archonship of Pytharatus, according to Diogenes Laertius , Lives of Eminent Philosophers , 10.15

L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “jones” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.
L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “laerti2” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.
L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “stanf” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.
L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “brita” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.
L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “dombr” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.
L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “laerti3” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.
L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “intra” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.
L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “folse” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.
L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “konstan” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.
L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “yapij” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.
L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “classics” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.
L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “tufts” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.
L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “infop” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.
L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “smitwood” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.
L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “glad” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.
L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> co ten “nussb” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong <references> khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.

L?i chu thich: Th?

<ref>

co ten “clay” đ??c đ?nh ngh?a trong

<references>

khong đ??c đo?n v?n b?n tren s? d?ng.

Th? m?c [ s?a | s?a ma ngu?n ]

Asmis, Elizabeth (1984), Epicurus' Scientific Method , Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, ISBN 978-08014-1465-7
Barnes, Jonathan (1986), “15: Hellenistic Philosophy and Science”, trong Boardman, John; Griffin, Jasper; Murray, Oswyn (bien t?p), The Oxford History of the Classical World , Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, tr. 365?385, ISBN 978-0198721123
Brewer, Ebenezer Cobham ; Evans, Ivor H. (1989), Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable (?n b?n 14), New York City, New York, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, St. Louis, Missouri, San Francisco, California, London, England, Singapore, Singapore, Sydney, Australia, Tokyo, Japan, and Toronto, Canada: Harper & Row Publishers, ISBN 978-0-06-016200-9
DeWitt, Norman Wentworth (1954), Epicurus and His Philosophy , Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, ISBN 978-0-816-65745-2
Erler, Michael (2011), “Chapter II: Autodidact and student: on the relationship of authority and autonomy in Epicurus and the Epicurean tradition”, trong Fish, Jeffrey; Sanders, Kirk R. (bien t?p), Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition , Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, tr. 9?28, ISBN 978-0-521-19478-5
Fish, Jeffrey; Sanders, Kirk R. (2011), “Chapter I: Introduction”, trong Fish, Jeffrey; Sanders, Kirk R. (bien t?p), Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition , Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, tr. 1?8, ISBN 978-0-521-19478-5
Frischer, Bernard (1982), The Sculpted Word: Epicureanism and Philosophical Recruitment in Ancient Greece , Berkeley and Los Angeles, California and London, England: University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-04190-5
Gordon, Pamela (2012), The Invention and Gendering of Epicurus , Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, ISBN 978-0-472-02817-7
Gordon, Pamela (2013), “Epistulatory Epicureans” , trong Boter, G. J.; Chaniotis, A.; Coleman, K. M.; de Jong, I. J. F.; Reinhardt, T. (bien t?p), Epistolary Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature , Mnemosyne: Supplements: Monographs on Greek and Latin Language and Literature, 359 , Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill, ISBN 978-90-04-25303-2
Jones, Howard (2010), “Epicurus and Epicureanism”, trong Grafton, Anthony ; Most, Glenn W. ; Settis, Salvatore (bien t?p), The Classical Tradition , Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, tr. 320?324, ISBN 978-0-674-03572-0
Hickson, Michael W. (2014), “A Brief History of Problems of Evil” , trong McBrayer, Justin P.; Howard-Snyder, Daniel (bien t?p), The Blackwell Companion to The Problem of Evil , Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, tr. 26?27, ISBN 978-1-118-60797-8
Kenny, Anthony (2004), Ancient Philosophy , A New History of Western Philosophy, 1 , Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, tr. 94?96, ISBN 978-0-19-875273-8
Long, A. A. (1999), “Epicurus”, A Companion to Philosophers , Malden, Massachusetts and Oxford, England: Wiley Publishers, Ltd., tr. 239?243, ISBN 978-0-63-122967-4
Rosenbaum, Stephen E. (2004), “Chapter 11: How to Be Dead and Not Care: A Defense of Epicurus” , trong Benatar, David (bien t?p), Life, Death & Meaning: Key Philosophical Readings on the Big Questions , Lanham, Maryland, Boulder, Colorado, New York City, New York, Toronto, Canada, and Oxford, England: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., ISBN 978-1-442-20169-9
Schafer, Paul M. (2003), “The Young Marx on Epicurus: Dialectical Atomism and Human Freedom” , trong Gordon, Dane L.; Suits, David B. (bien t?p), Epicurus: His Continuing Influence and Contemporary Relevance , Rochester, New York: Rochester Institute of Technology, Cary Graphic Arts Press, tr. 127?138, ISBN 978-0-9713-4596-6
Strodach, George K. (2012), “Introduction”, The Art of Happiness , New York City, New York: Penguin Classics, ISBN 978-0-14-310721-7
Wasson, Donald L. (7 thang 9 n?m 2016), “Epicurus” , World History Encyclopedia

đ?c them [ s?a | s?a ma ngu?n ]

Bai lu?n

Epicurus (1994). Inwood, Brad; Gerson, Lloyd P. (bien t?p). The Epicurus Reader. Selected Writings and Testimonia . Indianapolis: Hackett. ISBN 978-0-87220-242-9 .
Epicurus (1993). The essential Epicurus : letters, principal doctrines, Vatican sayings, and fragments . O'Connor, Eugene bien d?ch. Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-0-87975-810-3 .
Epicurus (1964). Letters, principal doctrines, and Vatican sayings . Geer, Russel M. bien d?ch. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Laertius, Diogenes (1969). Caponigri, A. Robert (bien t?p). Lives of the Philosophers . Chicago: Henry Regnery Co.
Lucretius Carus, Titus (1976). On the nature of the universe . Latham, R. E. bien d?ch. London: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-044018-8 .
Korte, Alfred (1987). Epicureanism : Two collections of fragments and studies (b?ng ti?ng Hy L?p). New York: Garland. ISBN 978-0-8240-6915-5 .
Oates, Whitney J. (1940). The Stoic and Epicurean philosophers, The Complete Extant Writings of Epicurus, Epictetus, Lucretius and Marcus Aurelius . New York: Modern Library.
Diogenes c?a Oinoanda (1993). The Epicurean inscription . Smith, Martin Ferguson bien d?ch. Napoli: Bibliopolis. ISBN 978-88-7088-270-4 .

Nghien c?u

Bailey C. (1928). The Greek Atomists and Epicurus , Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bakalis, Nikolaos (2005). Handbook of Greek Philosophy from Thales to the Stoics. Analysis and fragments . Victoria: Trafford. ISBN 978-1-4120-4843-9 .
Gordon, Pamela (1996). Epicurus in Lycia. The Second-Century World of Diogenes of Oenoanda . Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0-472-10461-1 .
Gottlieb, Anthony (2000). The Dream of Reason. A History of Western Philosophy from the Greeks to the Renaissance . New York: W.W. Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-04951-0 .
Hibler, Richard W. (1984). Happiness Through Tranquillity. The school of Epicurus . Lanham, MD: University Press of America. ISBN 978-0-8191-3861-3 .
Hicks, R. D. (1910). Stoic and Epicurean . New York: Scribner.
Jones, Howard (1989). The Epicurean Tradition . London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-02069-5 .
Obbink, Dirk (1989). “The Atheism of Epicurus” . Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies . 30 (2): 187?223.
O'Keefe, Tim (2009). Epicureanism . University of California Press.
Panichas, George Andrew (1967). Epicurus . New York: Twayne Publishers.
Rist, J.M. (1972). Epicurus. An introduction . London: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-08426-0 .
Warren, James (2009). The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism . New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-05218-7347-5 .
William Wallace . Epicureanism . SPCK (1880)

Lien k?t ngoai [ s?a | s?a ma ngu?n ]

Tim hi?u them v? Epicurus t?i cac d? an lien quan
	T? đi?n t? Wiktionary
	T?p tin ph??ng ti?n t? Commons
	Danh ngon t? Wikiquote
	V?n ki?n t? Wikisource
	D? li?u t? Wikidata

Wikisource Hy L?p co ch?a v?n b?n g?c lien quan đ?n bai vi?t nay: Κ?ριαι Δ?ξαι
Wikisource Hy L?p co ch?a v?n b?n g?c lien quan đ?n bai vi?t nay: ?πιστολ? πρ?? Μενοικ?α
Konstan, David. “Epicurus” . Trong Zalta, Edward N. (bien t?p). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy .
O'Keefe, Tim. “Epicurus” . Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy .
Stoic And Epicurean b?i Robert Drew Hicks (1910) (Internet Archive)
Epicurea, Hermann Usener - Toan v?n
Cac tac ph?m c?a ho?c noi v? Epicurus t?i Internet Archive
Tac ph?m c?a Epicurus tren LibriVox (sach audio thu?c ph?m vi cong c?ng) .
Society of Friends of Epicurus
Di?n đan th?o lu?n v? Epicurus va tri?t h?c Epicurus - EpicureanFriends.com

[buyu-1] Bunnin & Yu (2004). The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy . Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

[2] Apollodorus (reported by Diogenes Laertius , Lives of Eminent Philosophers , 10.14-15 ) gives his birth on the fourth day of the month February in the third year of the 109th Olympiad , in the archonship of Sosigenes

[bitsori-3] Maria Bitsori & Galanakis, Emmanouil (2004). “Epicurus' death”. World Journal of Urology . 22 (6): 466?469. doi : 10.1007/s00345-004-0448-2 . PMID 15372192 . Qu?n ly CS1: s? d?ng tham s? tac gi? ( lien k?t ) L?i chu thich: Th? <ref> khong h?p l?: ten “bitsori” đ??c đ?nh ro nhi?u l?n, m?i l?n co n?i dung khac

[4] In the second year of the 127th Olympiad, in the archonship of Pytharatus, according to Diogenes Laertius , Lives of Eminent Philosophers , 10.15

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

x t s Tri?t h?c khoa h?c
Sinh h?c Hoa h?c V?t ly Tinh th?n Tri tu? nhan t?o Thong tin Nh?n th?c Khong th?i gian Thermal and statistical physics Khoa h?c xa h?i Moi tr??ng Tam ly Cong ngh? Khoa h?c may tinh
Ca nhan	Adolf Grunbaum Albert Einstein Alfred North Whitehead Aristoteles Auguste Comte Averroes Bas van Fraassen Berlin Circle Bertrand Russell Carl Gustav Hempel C. D. Broad Charles Sanders Peirce Dominicus Gundissalinus Daniel Dennett Epicurians Francis Bacon Friedrich Schelling Galileo Galilei Henri Poincare Herbert Spencer Hugh of Saint Victor Immanuel Kant Imre Lakatos Isaac Newton John Dewey John Stuart Mill Jurgen Habermas Karl Pearson Karl Popper Karl Jaspers Larry Laudan Mario Bunge Michael Polanyi Otto Neurath Paul Haberlin Paul Feyerabend Pierre Duhem Pierre Gassendi Platon R. B. Braithwaite Rene Descartes Robert Kilwardby Roger Bacon Rudolf Carnap Stephen Toulmin Ch? ngh?a kh?c k? Thomas Hobbes Thomas Kuhn Vienna Circle W.V.O. Quine Wilhelm Windelband Wilhelm Wundt William x? Ockham William Whewell them...
Khai ni?m	Analysis Analytic?synthetic distinction Tien nghi?m Tri tu? nhan t?o Hi?u ?ng v?t ly Commensurability Construct Demarcation problem Empirical evidence Explanatory power Explanandum Fact Falsifiability Feminist method Ignoramus et ignorabimus L?p lu?n quy n?p Ingenuity Inquiry Intertheoretic reduction Models of scientific inquiry Nature Objectivity Observation M?u hinh Problem of induction đ?nh lu?t Ph??ng phap khoa h?c Cach m?ng khoa h?c Ly thuy?t khoa h?c Testability Theory choice Theory?ladenness Underdetermination
Metatheory	Confirmation holism Coherentism Constructive empiricism Constructive realism Constructivist epistemology Contextualism Conventionalism Deductive-nomological model Determinism Ch? ngh?a kinh nghi?m Fallibilism Foundationalism Hypothetico-deductive model Inductionism Infinitism Instrumentalism Model-dependent realism Ch? ngh?a t? nhien (tri?t h?c) Thuy?t th?c h?u Ch? ngh?a th?c ch?ng Ch? ngh?a th?c d?ng Ch? ngh?a duy ly Received view of theories Ch? ngh?a rut g?n Scientific anti-realism Scientific essentialism Scientific formalism Scientific realism Scientific skepticism Scientism Semantic view of theories Structuralism Uniformitarianism Vitalism Sieu hinh h?c
Lien quan	Nh?n th?c lu?n L?ch s? va tri?t h?c khoa h?c L?ch s? khoa h?c History of evolutionary thought Ng?y khoa h?c M?i quan h? gi?a ton giao va khoa h?c Tu t? khoa h?c Xa h?i h?c v? ki?n th?c khoa h?c Ch? trich khoa h?c Gi? kim thu?t