Юдея ? Самар?я

	Юдея ? Самар?я
Континент	Аз?я
Кра?на	?зра?ль
Адм?н?стративно-територ?ально под?ля?ться на	Efrat d , Бейтар-?л?т , Мод??н-?л?т , Ар??ль , К?р'ят-Арба , Бейт Ар'?-Офар?м , Beit El d , Маал?-Адум?м , Har Adar d , Alfei Menashe d , Oranit d , Gush Etzion Regional Council d , Mateh Binyamin Regional Council d , Кдум?м d , Elkana d , Giv'at Ze'ev d , Шомронська рег?ональна рада , Immanuel d , Рег?ональна рада Гар-Хеврон , Bik'at HaYarden Regional Council d , Karnei Shomron d , Megilot Regional Council d , Ma'ale Efrayim d , Area C d
Сп?льний кордон ?з	Хайфський округ , П?вн?чний округ
Займа? ту саму територ?ю з	Зах?дний берег р?чки Йордан
	Юдея ? Самар?я у В?к?сховищ?

Координати : 32°06′18″ пн. ш. 35°11′23″ сх. д. / 32.10513900002777632° пн. ш. 35.18992800002777699° сх. д.

Про ?стор?ю та географ?ю ?сторично? област? Юдея див. Юдея .

Про ?стор?ю та географ?ю ?сторично? област? Самар?я див. Самар?я .

Про Палестинську нац?ональну адм?н?страц?ю на ц?й територ?? див. статтю див. Зах?дний берег р?чки Йордан .

У В?к?пед?? ? статт? про ?нш? значення цього терм?на: Юдея (значення) .

О?круг Юде?я ? Сама?р?я ( ?вр. ???? ????? ??????? ‎) ? один з семи адм?н?стративних округ?в ?зра?лю . Територ?я округу зазвичай в?дома за межами ?зра?лю як Зах?дний берег р?чки Йордан .

Статус

Округ Юдея ? Самар?я належать до Центрального в?йськового округу ^[en] Арм?? Оборони ?зра?лю , й адм?н?стративн? р?шення ухвалюються командувачем округу. Чинний командувач Центральним в?йськовим округом, командувач ?зра?льськими в?йськами в Юде? та Самар?? ? генерал-майор Н?цан Алон.

П?сля Арабо-?зра?льсько? в?йни (1947?1949) цей рег?он знаходився п?д контролем Йордан?? до 1967 року. У результат? перемоги ?зра?лю у Шестиденн?й в?йн? контроль над ним перейшов до ?зра?лю. Зг?дно Резолюц?? 242 Ради Безпеки ООН , ?зра?ль повинен п?ти з територ?й, захоплених у ход? конфл?кту, за умови припинення вс?х вза?мних претенз?й ? виконання Резолюц?? та припинення стану в?йни. Майбутн?й статус рег?ону ? ключовим чинником у поточному ?зра?льсько-палестинському конфл?кт? . Нин? це рег?он ?зра?лю, населення якого зроста? найб?льш швидко: щор?чно на 5 %.

?стор?я

Поняття ≪Округ Юдея ? Самар?я≫ було оф?ц?йно затверджене ?зра?льським урядом 1967 року, але стало повсюдно використовуватися т?льки п?сля приходу до управл?ння кра?ною парт?? Л?куд у 1977 роц? ^[1].

Назва ≪Юдея≫ , при використанн? у назв? округу, в?дноситься до всього рег?ону на п?вдень в?д ?русалиму , включаючи поселення в ?уш-Ец?он ? Хар-Хеврон. Область ≪Самар?я≫ знаходиться з ?ншого боку ? в?дноситься до вс?х пункт?в у вс?х районах на п?вн?ч в?д ?русалиму.

М?ста

№	Назва	Число жител?в	Площа (в дунамах )	Р?к буд?вництва	Статус м?ста з
1	Мод??н ?л?т	40,700	4,746	1990	2008
2	Бейтар-?л?т	34,100	3,970	1988	2001
3	Маал?-Адум?м	33,700	49,177	1977	1991
4	Ар?ель	16,700	14,677	1978	1998

Адм?н?стративн? органи м?сцевого самоврядування

Територ?я под?ля?ться на в?с?м в?йськово-адм?н?стративних рег?он?в: Менаше (район Джен?н ), Ха-Б?ка ( долина Йордану ), Шомрон (район Шихем , в?домий арабською як Наблус ), Ефра?м (район Тулькарм ), Б?ньям?н ( Рамалла / аль-Б?рех ^[en]), Маккав?м (район Маккав?м ), Ец?он (район В?фле?му ) та ?гуда (район Хеврону ).

?зра?льськ? поселення

М?ста	М?сцев? ради	Рег?ональн? ради
Ар??ль Бейтар-?л?т Маал?-Адум?м Мод??н ?л?т	Алфей Менаше ^[en] Бейт-Ар'?-Офар?м Бейт Ель ^[en] Ефрат ^[en] Елкана ^[en] Г?в'ат Зе?в ^[en] Хар Адар ^[en] Еману?л ^[en] Карней Шомрон ^[en] Кедум?м ^[en] К?р'ят-Арба Маале Ефра?м ^[en] Оран?т ^[en]	Б?к'ат Ха-Ярден ^[en] Гуш Ец?он ^[en] Гар-Хеврон Мате Б?ньям?н ^[en] Мег?лот Мертве море ^[en] Шомрон

Див. також

Прим?тки

↑
- Ian Lustick (2002). The Riddle of Nationalism: The Dialectic of Religion and Nationalism in the Middle East . Logos, Vol.1, No-3. с. 18?44. The terms “occupied territory” or “West Bank” were forbidden in news reports. Television and radio journalists were banned from initiating interviews with Arabs who recognized the PLO as their representative.
- Myron J. Aronoff (1991). Israeli Visions and Divisions: Cultural Change and Political Conflict . Transaction Publishers. с. 10. [...] “Judea and Samaria”, the biblical terms that the Likud government succeeded in substituting for what had previously been called by many the West Bank, the occupied territories, or simply the territories. The successful gaining of the popular acceptance of these terms was a prelude to gaining popular acceptance of the government’s settlement policies.
- Shlomo Gazit (2003). Trapped Fools: Thirty Years of Israeli Policy in the Territories . Routledge. с. 162. [...] the Likud Government was not satisfied with the name ‘Administered Territories’. Even though the name ‘Judea and Samaria’ had been officially adopted as early as the beginning of 1968 instead of the ‘West Bank’, it has hardly been used until 1977.
- Emma Playfair (1992). International Law and the Administration of Occupied Territories: Two Decades of Israeli Occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip . Oxford University Press. с. 41. On 17 December 1967, the Israeli military government issued an order stating that “the term “Judea and Samaria region” shall be identical in meaning for all purposes . .to the term “the West Bank Region”. This change in terminology, which has been followed in Israeli official statements since that time, reflected a historic attachment to these areas and rejection of a name that was seen as implying Jordanian sovereignty over them.
- Ran HaCohen (1992). Influence of the Middle East Peace Process on the Hebrew Language . Undoing and Redoing Corpus Planning, Michael G. Clyne (ed.). с. 385?414, 397. During a short period immediately after the 1967 war, the official term employed was ‘the Occupied Territories’ (ha-shetahim ha-kevushim). It was soon replaced by ‘the Administered Territories’ (ha-shetahim ha-muhzakim) and then by the (biblical) Hebrew geographical terms “Judea and Samaria”. The latter were officially adopted and successfully promoted by the right wing governments (since 1977) and are still the official terms in use.

[Judea_and_Samaria-1] 
Ian Lustick (2002). The Riddle of Nationalism: The Dialectic of Religion and Nationalism in the Middle East . Logos, Vol.1, No-3. с. 18?44. The terms “occupied territory” or “West Bank” were forbidden in news reports. Television and radio journalists were banned from initiating interviews with Arabs who recognized the PLO as their representative.

Myron J. Aronoff (1991). Israeli Visions and Divisions: Cultural Change and Political Conflict . Transaction Publishers. с. 10. [...] “Judea and Samaria”, the biblical terms that the Likud government succeeded in substituting for what had previously been called by many the West Bank, the occupied territories, or simply the territories. The successful gaining of the popular acceptance of these terms was a prelude to gaining popular acceptance of the government’s settlement policies.

Shlomo Gazit (2003). Trapped Fools: Thirty Years of Israeli Policy in the Territories . Routledge. с. 162. [...] the Likud Government was not satisfied with the name ‘Administered Territories’. Even though the name ‘Judea and Samaria’ had been officially adopted as early as the beginning of 1968 instead of the ‘West Bank’, it has hardly been used until 1977.

Emma Playfair (1992). International Law and the Administration of Occupied Territories: Two Decades of Israeli Occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip . Oxford University Press. с. 41. On 17 December 1967, the Israeli military government issued an order stating that “the term “Judea and Samaria region” shall be identical in meaning for all purposes . .to the term “the West Bank Region”. This change in terminology, which has been followed in Israeli official statements since that time, reflected a historic attachment to these areas and rejection of a name that was seen as implying Jordanian sovereignty over them.

Ran HaCohen (1992). Influence of the Middle East Peace Process on the Hebrew Language . Undoing and Redoing Corpus Planning, Michael G. Clyne (ed.). с. 385?414, 397. During a short period immediately after the 1967 war, the official term employed was ‘the Occupied Territories’ (ha-shetahim ha-kevushim). It was soon replaced by ‘the Administered Territories’ (ha-shetahim ha-muhzakim) and then by the (biblical) Hebrew geographical terms “Judea and Samaria”. The latter were officially adopted and successfully promoted by the right wing governments (since 1977) and are still the official terms in use.

[2] Ian Lustick (2002). The Riddle of Nationalism: The Dialectic of Religion and Nationalism in the Middle East . Logos, Vol.1, No-3. с. 18?44. The terms “occupied territory” or “West Bank” were forbidden in news reports. Television and radio journalists were banned from initiating interviews with Arabs who recognized the PLO as their representative.

[3] Myron J. Aronoff (1991). Israeli Visions and Divisions: Cultural Change and Political Conflict . Transaction Publishers. с. 10. [...] “Judea and Samaria”, the biblical terms that the Likud government succeeded in substituting for what had previously been called by many the West Bank, the occupied territories, or simply the territories. The successful gaining of the popular acceptance of these terms was a prelude to gaining popular acceptance of the government’s settlement policies.

[4] Shlomo Gazit (2003). Trapped Fools: Thirty Years of Israeli Policy in the Territories . Routledge. с. 162. [...] the Likud Government was not satisfied with the name ‘Administered Territories’. Even though the name ‘Judea and Samaria’ had been officially adopted as early as the beginning of 1968 instead of the ‘West Bank’, it has hardly been used until 1977.

[5] Emma Playfair (1992). International Law and the Administration of Occupied Territories: Two Decades of Israeli Occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip . Oxford University Press. с. 41. On 17 December 1967, the Israeli military government issued an order stating that “the term “Judea and Samaria region” shall be identical in meaning for all purposes . .to the term “the West Bank Region”. This change in terminology, which has been followed in Israeli official statements since that time, reflected a historic attachment to these areas and rejection of a name that was seen as implying Jordanian sovereignty over them.

[6] Ran HaCohen (1992). Influence of the Middle East Peace Process on the Hebrew Language . Undoing and Redoing Corpus Planning, Michael G. Clyne (ed.). с. 385?414, 397. During a short period immediately after the 1967 war, the official term employed was ‘the Occupied Territories’ (ha-shetahim ha-kevushim). It was soon replaced by ‘the Administered Territories’ (ha-shetahim ha-muhzakim) and then by the (biblical) Hebrew geographical terms “Judea and Samaria”. The latter were officially adopted and successfully promoted by the right wing governments (since 1977) and are still the official terms in use.

[1]

Юдея ? Самар?я

Зм?ст

Статус

?стор?я

М?ста

Адм?н?стративн? органи м?сцевого самоврядування

?зра?льськ? поселення

Див. також

Прим?тки

Нав?гац?йне меню

Юдея ? Самар?я

Статус

?стор?я

М?ста

Адм?н?стративн? органи м?сцевого самоврядування

?зра?льськ? поселення

Див. також

Прим?тки

Нав?гац?йне меню

Пошук