한국   대만   중국   일본 
Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 071801 (2023) - Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment
  • Featured in Physics
  • Editors' Suggestion

Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment

X. Fan, T.?G. Myers, B.?A.?D. Sukra, and G. Gabrielse
Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 , 071801 ? Published 13 February 2023
Physics logo See Viewpoint: Searching for New Physics with the Electron’s Magnetic Moment

Abstract

The electron magnetic moment, ? μ / μ B = g / 2 = 1.001 159 652 180 59 ( 13 ) [0.13?ppt], is determined 2.2 times more accurately than the value that stood for fourteen years. The most precisely determined property of an elementary particle tests the most precise prediction of the standard model (SM) to 1 part in 10 12 . The test would improve an order of magnitude if the uncertainty from discrepant measurements of the fine structure constant α is eliminated since the SM prediction is a function of α . The new measurement and SM theory together predict α ? 1 = 137.035 999 166 ( 15 ) [0.11?ppb] with an uncertainty 10 times smaller than the current disagreement between measured α values.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 27 September 2022
  • Revised 7 December 2022
  • Accepted 7 December 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.071801

ⓒ 2023 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Atomic, Molecular & Optical Particles & Fields General Physics

Viewpoint

Key Image

Searching for New Physics with the Electron’s Magnetic Moment

Published 13 February 2023

Measurements of the magnetic moment of the electron have achieved unprecedented accuracy, showing great potential for the search for physics beyond the standard model.

See more in Physics

Authors & Affiliations

X. Fan 1,2,* , T.?G. Myers 2 , B.?A.?D. Sukra 2 , and G. Gabrielse 2,†

  • 1 Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 2 Center for Fundamental Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA

  • * xing.fan@northwestern.edu
  • gerald.gabrielse@northwestern.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 130, Iss. 7 ? 17 February 2023

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    This Northwestern determination (red) and our 2008 Harvard determination (blue) [ 37 ]. SM predictions (solid and open black points for slightly differing C 10 [ 40, 41 ]) are functions of discrepant α measurements [ 38, 39 ]. A ppt is 10 ? 12 .

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    (a)?Cryogenic system supports a 50?mK electron trap upon a 4.2?K solenoid to provide a very stable B . (b)?Silver electrodes of a cylindrical Penning trap. (c)?Quantum spin and cyclotron energy levels used for measurement.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Quantum jump cyclotron (a) and anomaly (b)?line shapes that are measured (points), predicted (dashed line) and fit (solid line) vs fractional drive detunings from f ? c ( 1 + ε ) and ν ? a ( 1 + ε ) (defined later in the text). (c)?A dip in Johnson noise reveals ν ? z .

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    (a)?Measured g / 2 ? 1.001 159 652 180 59 before (white) and after (red) cavity-shift correction. (b)?Measurements take place in valleys of the cyclotron damping rate where spontaneous emission is inhibited.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    SM prediction of α using μ / μ B from this Northwestern measurement (red), and from our 2008 Harvard measurement (blue), with solid and open points for slightly differing C 10 [ 40, 41 ]. The α measurements (black) were made with Cs at Berkeley [ 38 ] and Rb in Paris [ 39 ]. A ppb is 10 ? 9 .

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×