この文書はウィキバ?シティ日本語版の 公式な方針あるいはガイドライン の草案です。 現時点ではまだ拘束力はありません。現在、?容に?して ノ?トペ?ジ で議論を行なっています。

基本方針とガイドライン の?略:

失?や思いやりに欠ける態度、?量な姿勢というものは、他人とのいさかいを招き、ひいてはウィキバ?シティの円滑な運?を妨げます。他人が行儀の?い行いを思いとどまるような行動をとるようにしてください。そして、知らず知らずのうちに他人の感情を害することがないよう、?を付けてください。

あらゆるWikimediaのプロジェクトにて ?儀 は、記事の編集?コメント?議論で守るべき規則です。無?とは、 いさかい や 緊張?係 を招く個人に?するふるまい です。?儀の規則とは 人は他人に?して?儀をもってふるまわなければならない。 というもので、これにより無?な行いは禁じられます。?儀の規則は、望ましい行動と望ましくない行動を定義する妥?な方針としてあります。

編集?容への批判は、一?間違えるだけで編集した人への無?になる、という事は忘れられがちです。 だから批判する側の人は不必要にとげとげしく、批判される側の人は不必要に敏感になるのです。 インタ?ネット上の文章による意思疎通では、?による?話のように他人にニュアンスを?えることができません。だから、たわいもない?薄な一言は、簡?に誤解されてしまいます。 たった一つの不作法な意見が、同じような言葉のやり取りのきっかけになってしまい、?加者が記事の?容を向上させることではなく、"敵"に"勝利"を?めることに血道を上げるようになるのです。これはウィキバ?シティが目指しているところではありません。 Wikiversity:ウィキバ?シティとは何か も?照してください。

無?な雰??を招く 良い例 を?げます。:

• ?暴なふるまい?言葉遣い
• 編集?容の?明での糾?的な口調("だらしない綴り間違いを訂正","とりとめが無いゴミを削除")
• 言語能力や言葉の選?を理由に、執筆者を貶める。
• ちょっとした不手際を無分別に糾?する。
• こんな風に前置きをおいたコメントをする。「個人攻?とは思わないでほしいんだな、けどね...」
• 他人をうそつきと呼んだり、中傷や名??損を糾?すること。もし本?にそうだとしても、そういう指摘は、?動を解決せずむしろ?化させる傾向があります。

さらに 深刻な例 を以下に?げます。

• あざけり
• 個人攻?
  • 人種?民族?宗?への中傷
  • 他の人に?する 不敬
• ?
• ユ?ザ?ペ?ジへの破?行?
• Pagemove Trolling を通して、ユ?ザ?に?蔑的な名前を?える。
• 不正義に禁止やブロックを要求する。

無?な?況の例をあげましょう。
始まりはこうです。 あなたが新しいペ?ジを作りました。誰かがこう言います。「意味不明なペ?ジを書くなとはいわんが、せめてつづり間違いくらい直せ。」
あなたはこう答えます。「放っておいてくれ。」そして事態は?化してゆきます。

こういう編集者間のやり取りは、人?から寄稿しようという?持ちをそぎ、より重要なことを見失わせ、共同?の力をそぐことになるのです。

• During an edit war, when people have different opinions, or when there is a conflict over sharing power.
• When the community grows larger. Each editor does not know all the others and may not perceive the importance of each individual to the project ? so they don't worry about maintaining relationships that don't exist. Reputation does not count as much as in a smaller community.
• Sometimes, a particularly impolite user joins the project. This can also aggravate other editors into being impolite themselves.

Most of the time, insults are used in the heat of the moment during a longer conflict. They are essentially a way to end the discussion. Often the person who made the insult regrets having used such words afterwards. This in itself is a good reason to remove (or refactor ) the offending words.

In other cases, the offender is doing it on purpose: either to distract the "opponent(s)" from the issue, or simply to drive them away from working on the article or even from the project, or to push them to commit an even greater breach in civility, which might result in ostracism or banning. In those cases, it is far less likely that the offender will have any regrets and apologize.

It should be noted that some editors deliberately push others to the point of breaching civility, without committing such a breach themselves.

• Because it makes people unhappy, resulting in discouragement and departure
• Because it makes people angry, resulting in non-constructive or even uncivil behavior themselves, further escalating the level of incivility
• Because it puts people on the defensive, closing their minds to other ideas and preventing a consensus from forming
• Because people lose good faith, resulting in even less ability to resolve the current conflict ? or the next one

Preventing incivility within Wikiversity [ 編集 ]

• Prevent edit wars and conflict between individuals ( constraints on editing are set by the project ? essentially a community answer )
• Force delays between answers to give time to editors to calm down and recover and to avoid further escalation of a conflict ( protecting pages, or temporary blocks of editors in case of conflict )
• Use positive feedback ( praising those who do not respond to incivility with incivility )
• Apply peer pressure ( voicing displeasure each time rudeness or incivility happens )
• Solve the root of the conflict between the offender and the other editor(s) or the community ? or find a compromise.
• Use negative feedback ( suggesting that an editor involved in conflict should leave a conflict or even temporarily avoid all controversial areas in Wikiversity ). It may be worthwhile making such suggestions to both sides of the conflict.
• Block certain users from editing specific pages that often trigger incivility
• Create and enforce a new rule ? based on use of certain words ? that will allow temporary blocking or banning an editor using them more than a certain number of times.
• Filter emails by the offender, or filter mail based on certain keywords and reject emails to the Wikiversity mailing list with those words
• Accepting that incivility and rudeness can't be entirely avoided in such a project, and not responding in kind.
• Giving awards for good edits.

Editorial Note: This draft proposed policy en:Wikiversity:Productive_Forking_and_Tailoring_is_Encouraged is an attempt to allow heated factions a chance to go separate editing ways within the database during a cooling off period. Unlike an encyclypedia a learning institution can have multiple versions of material diverging as opposing factions get their logical arguments, references, assumed facts, and assumptions lined out. Please explore and express your opinion by voting here en:Wikiversity:Policies of this as a standard practice to help manage and reduce unnecessary strife. This note is not yet part of this policy proposal and should be deleted if the above link goes inactive. Mirwin 06:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Reducing the impact [ 編集 ]

• Balance each uncivil comment by providing a soothing or constructive comment
• Do not answer offensive comments. Forget about them. Forgive the editor. Do not escalate the conflict. ( an individual approach )
• Ignore incivility. Operate as if the offender does not exist. Set up a "wall" between the offender and the community.
• Revert edits with a veil of invisibility (&bot=1) to reduce the impact of the offensive words used in edit summaries (the comment box)
• Walk away. Just go edit somewhere else for a while and return when tempers have cooled.
• If you happen to offend someone, apologize. Remove the offense, if possible, and keep the apology. However, please do not expect or attempt to mandate that others act likewise.

Removing uncivil comments [ 編集 ]

• Strike offensive words or replace them with milder ones on talk pages ( this is often seen as controversial, as is refactoring other people's words )
• Remove offensive comments on talk pages ( since they remain in the page history, anyone can find them again or refer to them later on )
• Revert an edit with &bot=1, so that the edit made by the offender appears invisible in Recent Changes ( do-able on ip contributions, requires technical help for logged-in user )
• Delete (entirely and permanently) an edit made by the offender ( requires technical help )
• Permanently delete an offensive comment made on the mailing lists ( requires technical help )
• Replace a comment made in an edit summary by another less offensive comment ( requires technical help )

Explain incivility [ 編集 ]

Some editors are badly shaken by uncivil words directed towards them, and can't focus on the source of the conflict itself. It may help to point out to them why unpleasant words were used, and acknowledge that while incivility is wrong, the ideas behind the comment may be valid.

The offended person may realize that the words were not always meant literally, and could decide to forgive and forget them.

It can be helpful to point out breaches of civility even when done on purpose to hurt, as it might help the disputant to refocus on the issue ( controversial ).

Suggest apologizing [ 編集 ]

The apology is a form of ritual exchange between both parties, where words are said that allow reconciliation.

For some people, it may be crucial to receive an apology from those who have offended them. For this reason, a sincere apology is often the key to the resolution of a conflict: an apology is a symbol of forgiveness. An apology is very much recommended when one person's perceived incivility has offended another.

• Help:Resource attribution - an optional scheme for promoting civility and cooperation between educators when someone has an interest in a particular resource page and may need it for their classes.