From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This page falls within the scope of the
Wikipedia:Manual of Style
, a collaborative effort focused on enhancing clarity, consistency, and cohesiveness across the
Manual of Style
(MoS) guidelines by addressing inconsistencies, refining language, and integrating guidance effectively.
Manual of Style
Wikipedia:WikiProject Manual of Style
Template:WikiProject Manual of Style
Manual of Style articles
| | | This page falls under the
contentious topics
procedure and is given additional attention, as it closely associated to the English Wikipedia
Manual of Style
, and the
article titles policy
. Both areas are subjects of debate.
Contributors are urged to review the
awareness criteria
carefully and exercise caution when editing.
| | For information on Wikipedia's approach to the establishment of new
policies and guidelines
, refer to
WP:PROPOSAL
. Additionally,
guidance on how to contribute to the development and revision of Wikipedia policies
of Wikipedia's policy and guideline documents is available, offering valuable insights and recommendations.
|
|
| This page is within the scope of
WikiProject Disambiguation
, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation
pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can
edit the page
attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page
, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion
.
Disambiguation
Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation
Template:WikiProject Disambiguation
Disambiguation articles
| |
|
|
Archives:
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
,
14
,
15
,
16
,
17
,
18
,
19
,
20
,
21
,
22
,
23
,
24
,
25
,
26
,
27
,
28
,
29
,
30
,
31
,
32
,
33
,
34
,
35
,
36
,
37
,
38
,
39
,
40
,
41
,
42
,
43
,
44
|
|
Archives
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than
90 days
may be automatically archived by
Lowercase sigmabot III
.
|
At
IPA
,
User:Joy
is insisting on sorting the "commonly refers to" list according to the
clickstream data
rather than alphabetical. Is there a guideline that supports doing this? Has there been discussion on sorting order on DAB pages?
Nardog
(
talk
) 02:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- The order for the commonly-refers-to list isn't documented specifically, but the spirit of the text suggests that
MOS:DABORDER
#4, which allows either way of sorting, should apply to it.
- Also FWIW, of the two commonly-refers-to examples,
Mercury
is in frequency order and
Mojave
is near-random but closer to frequency than alphabetic.
Dan Bloch
(
talk
) 02:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- I've elaborated further at
Talk:IPA#clickstreams data
.
- On a more general note, we know that alphabetical lists work well as a safe option when there's no other way for the reader to predict their traversal of a long list, but in short lists it's unlikely that readers spend a lot of time figuring out sorting.
- The key question here would be what constitutes a short list. In the case of top 4
MOS:DABCOMMON
items right at the top of the page, it seems easy enough, but we also have various different cases. For example, the
WP:NAMELIST
guideline has completely decimated lists of people, where practically none get listed up front in short lists, and practically all get listed in long lists. This has had a negative effect on navigation that I've complained about before - wherever we happen to have a vaguely popular item in the short list, it gets way more traffic than a otherwise very popular items in the long list.
- Random Brazilian footballer lists, or for example various entertainers like singers or rappers, or in turn minor toponyms and whatnot, effectively spam the top-level disambiguation lists just because they are single-word matches, while biographies with vastly different long-term significance are relegated to long lists, where they're actually much harder to find. A recent egregious example of something like this is
Talk:Boyle#post-move
.
- We'd really have to do some research about what actually makes the most sense for readers (
Wikipedia:Readers first
). From other web user research it's become generally know that the contents of the first page of text is the most relevant (i.e. scrolling is not great), and that people read typical websites in an L-shaped fashion, from the top left towards the top right and then from the top left to the bottom left (i.e. there's a huge difference in where something is). Obviously another question is if and how the average web user changes their behavior as they become the average Wikipedia reader. The difference between the observed Wikipedia reader clickstreams from the list at IPA and the general Google Search Trends for IPA are an interesting case for this - apparently people at the encyclopedia act differently in this regard than people at the general search engine.
- In an earlier thread, I also noted differences in how the existence of a section heading and the length of caption may apparently affect the outcomes of our
MOS:DABCOMMON
lists. --
Joy
(
talk
) 10:52, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Please express an expert opinion in
Talk:Qasr#Agreed: ONLY places called solely Qasr to be listed
. The issue is whether two-part names, such as "proper_name + object_type", e.g., [[<something> Prison]] and the likes, belong to [[<something> (disambiguation)]]. -
Altenmann
>talk
21:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- The guidance for this is at
WP:PTM
. --
Joy
(
talk
) 22:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
The redirect
Mos:Dp
has been listed at
redirects for discussion
to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines
. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25 §?Mos:Dp
until a consensus is reached.
Utopes
(
talk
/
cont
)
21:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
The redirect
Mos:DP
has been listed at
redirects for discussion
to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines
. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25 §?Mos:DP
until a consensus is reached.
Utopes
(
talk
/
cont
)
21:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
The redirect
Mos:Dab
has been listed at
redirects for discussion
to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines
. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25 §?Mos:Dab
until a consensus is reached.
Utopes
(
talk
/
cont
)
21:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
The redirect
Mos:DAB
has been listed at
redirects for discussion
to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines
. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25 §?Mos:DAB
until a consensus is reached.
Utopes
(
talk
/
cont
)
21:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]