From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page
or in a
deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was
keep
. When disregarding socks, consensus is clear that he's notable.
Star
Mississippi
21:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Micah McLaurin
(
edit
?|
talk
?|
history
?|
protect
?|
delete
?|
links
?|
watch
?|
logs
?|
views
)
? (
View log
|
edits since nomination
)
- (
Find sources:
Google
(
books
·
news
·
scholar
·
free images
·
WP?refs
)?
·
FENS
·
JSTOR
·
TWL
)
The article does not meet the requirement of notability. The entire page reads like a personal resume and is filled with puffery. There is no reason this article should be on Wikipedia.
??Preceding
unsigned
comment added by
CandlestickLane910
(
talk
?
contribs
) 17:02, January 15, 2022 (UTC)
He is young so this may change, but for now the article should be removed.
??Preceding
unsigned
comment added by
EveryFlowerandMe
(
talk
?
contribs
) 00:50, January 15, 2022 (UTC)
- Comment
This discussion page was created without the
{{
afd2
}}
template and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I have no opinion of my own on the article at this time.
@
CandlestickLane910
:
For future nominations, please fully follow the instructions at
WP:AFDHOWTO
. Thank you. --
Finngall
talk
02:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Delete
. Most of the sources are unreliable (it even links their Amazon and store pages). Other than winning the "Young Artist Award" it does not seem like they have done anything notable.
Wgullyn
(
talk
)
03:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
.
Tartar
Torte
03:21, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Music-related deletion discussions
.
Tartar
Torte
03:21, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions
.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T)
11:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Comment
Nominator and EveryFlowerandMe have been blocked per
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnathan57Joyceefyt
. Striking the comment of the latter. --
Finngall
talk
20:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Keep
but there are a number of references to inappropriate sources (e.g. Spotify) that need to be removed. There are some better references such as
[1]
,
[2]
. That was just with a very quick search, but there could be others.
Lamona
(
talk
) 02:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Speedy Delete
. Most of the sources unreliable.
??Preceding
unsigned
comment added by
DashDyeTod1
(
talk
?
contribs
) 04:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
WP:SOCKSTRIKE
--
Finngall
talk
06:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Speedy Keep
The Sources are reliable and the entire article passes per
WP:V
Chip3004
(
talk
) 05:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Keep
Sources are reliable and there's quite a few of them. I agree with
Chip
that it passes
WP:V
.
Lamona
found some better sources with a simple, quick search and I'm sure that there's others. At the very least it passes the basic requirements.
D
u
s
t
i
*Let's talk!*
15:05, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page
or in a
deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.