The result of the debate was 1, 2, 3... (40 keep/23 delete/2 other/1 disq.) no consensus , defaults to keep. This conclusion refers to the subject of the article, not the article itself.
I think the best compromise to put this messy past behind us is to give it a fresh start , (with unprotection) and let Wikipedians rewrite a neutral and verifiable version. If there are libellous/disparaging additions, delete only these edits, not the entire article. If it's vandalised, then revert on sight, and keep a watch on the article. - Mailer Diablo 01:17, 19 February 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Discussion blanked as a courtesy to article's subject. Ral315 ( talk ) 14:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]