Welcome!
Hello, F.Alexsandr, and
welcome
to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian
! Please
sign your name
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions
, ask me on my talk page, or place
{{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! -
Ahunt
(
talk
) 13:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
[
reply
]
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
176.88.142.57
(
talk
) 12:51, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring
. Thank you.
176.88.142.57
(
talk
) 12:56, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
[
reply
]
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
176.88.136.86
(
talk
)
|
Hi
F.Alexsandr
! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse
,
Article creation and Draft problems
, has been
archived
because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion
here
. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to
create a new thread
.
The archival was done by
Lowercase sigmabot III
, and this notification was delivered by
Muninnbot
, both
automated accounts
. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
{{
bots
|deny=Muninnbot}}
here on your user talk page.
Muninnbot
(
talk
) 19:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
[
reply
]
|
You can see from the very self
article
, how the conflict it's not "perceived", it is factual and ongoing, "ceasefire" has been invoked and are being invoked continuously, and Russia's intervention has been condemned by most of the United Nations community.
Yours seems like a non-neutral and revisionist modification, politically interested at worst. Do not insist.
Lone Internaut
(
talk
) 18:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- @
Lone Internaut
and
Lone Internaut
:
Its a western centric concept and a Western point of view. Russia is not CURRENTLY in a state of war with Ukraine and there is no CURRENT intervention. Please provide sources that russia is currently intrvening in Ukraine.
- As I imagined: obviously it's all an "interpretation of the West", not the blatant truth under everyone's eyes... sure, of course. You seem indeed blatantly politicized. You find all the neutral (and reliable) sources in the article itself that I linked to you, it is you who must give the sources of how Russia is not doing intervention in Ukraine - both Crimean and Donbass.
- If you insist, I'll have to bring the thing to the attention of the project or other users to generate a consensus. And believe me, I don't think they're going to buy the "bad and ugly West that lies" story - of course, because it's Russian-interested revisionism.
Lone Internaut
(
talk
) 18:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
[
reply
]
This is a one-time notification to all active WikiProject Spaceflight members.
|
The Downlink
project page
|
I am notifying you, that thep
The Downlink
newsletter is starting up again, the first new issue will be published on the 1 November 2020.
|
Thanks,
Terasail
[Talk]
|
--
MediaWiki message delivery
(
talk
) 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
Alpha Group
, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
FSB
. Such links are
usually incorrect
, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.
(Read the
FAQ
?? Join us at the
DPL WikiProject
.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions
. Thanks,
DPL bot
(
talk
) 06:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Yenisei (rocket)
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as
Start-Class
, which is recorded on its
talk page
. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they
develop
over time. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
help desk
.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself
without posting a request to
Articles for creation
.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
leaving us some feedback
.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Robert McClenon
(
talk
) 03:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
[
reply
]
| This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
It does
not
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (
COVID-19
). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose
sanctions
? such as
editing restrictions
,
bans
, or
blocks
? on editors who do not strictly follow
Wikipedia's policies
, or the
page-specific restrictions
, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the
guidance on these sanctions
. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
|
--
RexxS
(
talk
) 00:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Argo (Russian spacecraft)
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as
Stub-Class
, which is recorded on its
talk page
. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they
develop
over time. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
help desk
.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself
without posting a request to
Articles for creation
.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
leaving us some feedback
.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Sam-2727
(
talk
) 01:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
[
reply
]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
It does
not
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
discretionary sanctions
is in effect. Any administrator may impose
sanctions
on editors who do not strictly follow
Wikipedia's policies
, or the
page-specific restrictions
, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions
and the
Arbitration Committee's
decision
here
. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
--
Ymblanter
(
talk
) 11:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
[
reply
]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
WP:DRN
regarding reason. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "
thread name
".The discussion is about the topic
Gam-COVID-Vac
.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
F.Alexsandr
(
talk
) 14:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
[
reply
]
The page
Draft:Korsar UAV
has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under
section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion
, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous
copyright infringement
. This page appeared to be a direct copy from
https://vpk.name/library/f/korsar-bla.html
. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of
information
, but not as a source of
sentences
. This part is crucial:
say it in your own words
. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators
will be
blocked from editing
.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image ? which means allowing other people to use it for any reason ? then you
must
verify that externally by one of the processes explained at
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials
. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission
for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at
Wikipedia's copyright policy
for more details, or ask a question
here
.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the
deleting administrator
, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at
Wikipedia:Deletion Review
Primefac
(
talk
) 18:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC
Hi
@
F.Alexsandr
:
Could you not a find a reference for that section instead of removing it, and even contacting me and I could have had a go at getting a reference. That section comes straight from the very well-written German article.
scope_creep
Talk
15:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- @
Scope creep
:
I have scoured the German article, there was no information about motivations of the Soviets. The dismissive statement about them not caring about Globkes career in the Nazi past, and only caring because of his position in FRG is descriptive anyways and sounds like original research not grounded in any documentary evidence.
F.Alexsandr
(
talk
) 15:47, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Diff
. Please give a timestamp. I won't watch that one hour video again now - I'm quite certain you misunderstand something, because Musk said it would be cheaper than Falcon 1. Using the 2016 presentation is questionable anyway, that's still the carbon fiber model with very different parameters than what SpaceX is building now. --
mfb
(
talk
) 20:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- @
Mfb
and
Mfb
:
on 43:16 in this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7Uyfqi_TE8&ab_channel=SpaceX
you can clearly see on the screen 62 million dollars per flight. To be honest I think that there should be no cost estimates in the infobox at all, scince all of this is speculation on behalf of spaceX, but if 2 million aspirational number deserves to be in the infobox, i think that this number deserves too.
F.Alexsandr
(
talk
) 10:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- That is for a flight to Mars, which includes multiple launches of the system, and the main cost comes from the ship going to Mars because it cannot be reused often. The tanker is given as $8M for 5 flights, or $1.6M/flight, while the booster has $11 for 6 flights, or ~$1.8M/flight. Add both and we get $3.4 million per launch to Earth orbit. Which isn't too far off from the 2 million optimistic goal. --
mfb
(
talk
) 23:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- @
Mfb
and
Mfb
:
You are doing original research. All of this is pure speculation on your behalf. Once again, both numbers were provided by SpaceX, both numbers deserve to be up there. Or neither.
F.Alexsandr
(
talk
) 11:38, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- There is no OR about the price being for a flight to Mars (it's on the slide!), which is not what the infobox is about. Quoting it there is just wrong. I explained the slide to you here on your talk page. WP:OR applies to articles, not to user talk pages. Ignore that explanation if you don't like it, but save the article from completely wrong information please. --
mfb
(
talk
) 12:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation
has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
after they have been resolved
.
Johannes
(
Talk
)
(
Contribs
) (
Articles
)
15:02, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
6B45
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as
Start-Class
, which is recorded on its
talk page
. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they
develop
over time. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
help desk
.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself
without posting a request to
Articles for creation
.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
leaving us some feedback
.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Robert McClenon
(
talk
) 01:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
6B1
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as
Start-Class
, which is recorded on its
talk page
. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they
develop
over time. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
help desk
.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself
without posting a request to
Articles for creation
.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
leaving us some feedback
.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong
(
talk
) 14:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hello
F.Alexsandr
and welcome to the
Military history WikiProject
! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our
navigation box
points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The
announcement and open task box
is updated very frequently. You can
watchlist it
if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following:
{{
WPMILHIST Announcements
}}
.
- The project
Academy
has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is
Writing a good stub
.
- Important discussions take place on the project's
main discussion page
; it is highly recommended that you
watchlist it
.
- The project has several
departments
, which handle
article quality assessment
,
detailed article and content review
,
writing contests
, and
article logistics
.
- We have a number of
task forces
that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a set of
guidelines
that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many
articles that need attention
, as well as a number of
review alerts
.
- If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter,
The Bugle
, please sign up
here
.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the
project coordinators
or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around!
Pickersgill-Cunliffe
(
talk
) 15:41, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation
has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
after they have been resolved
.
Tails
Wx
01:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
|
Hello,
F.Alexsandr
!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk
. If you have any
other
questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse
, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Tails
Wx
01:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
|
2S42 Lotos
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
help desk
.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself
without posting a request to
Articles for creation
.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
leaving us some feedback
.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
WikiOriginal-9
(
talk
) 19:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:6B23
. Thanks! -
Rich
T
|
C
|
E-Mail
17:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation
has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
after they have been resolved
.
Vanderwaalforces
(
talk
) 19:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Flux_Malaysia
Dear @F.Alexandr,
I want to express my gratitude for taking the time to review my article, even though the outcome was less favorable than I had hoped. I would really like to get some insights if you do not mind sharing as I am new in publishing articles and after 3 months of efforts it is kind of disappointing that I could not get the article approved still.
I did have learned and improved but now stuck at the reference where i am not sure what is wrong as i did check notable regulations and reference guide and i cannot locate why it has been declined still.
One point about the reference is that as this is a new type of business in Malaysia so finding completely independent article on Flux is difficult but i did see some competitor's post has been approved even with not too much independent references which i am giving example below.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carsome
This even got approved with their CEO interview while mine got rejected.
It will be very helpful if you can help in guiding where exactly to change and get the article approve to publish.
AfnanzafarBD
(
talk
) 09:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Hello, AfnanzafarBD. The existence of a car sharing business or used cars business does not guarantee that it will automatically be notable for inclusion to Wikipedia.
Carsome
, which you gave as an example, is also on the verge of being notable, however, as one of the articles states, the company’s valuation is US$1.3 billion making it one of the largest tech unicorns in Malaysia, it is also older than Flux.
- As you also know, reliable independent sources are required for the article to be accepted, which is severely lacking from your article. You can try supporting your article by Malaysian language sources, if you think there is not much data in English.
- If you think that reviewers are unfair, and you still think this company is notable enough, you can ask around on
WP:MALAYSIA
. to find advice and support for your case, although I dont think you will find much success.
F.Alexsandr
(
talk
) 10:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
6B23
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as
Stub-Class
, which is recorded on its
talk page
. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they
develop
over time. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
help desk
.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself
without posting a request to
Articles for creation
.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
leaving us some feedback
.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong
(
talk
) 13:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
6B2
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as
Stub-Class
, which is recorded on its
talk page
. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they
develop
over time. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
help desk
.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself
without posting a request to
Articles for creation
.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
leaving us some feedback
.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong
(
talk
) 14:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
6B23
, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Annexation of Crimea
.
(
Opt-out instructions
.) --
DPL bot
(
talk
) 06:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
6B3
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as
Stub-Class
, which is recorded on its
talk page
. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they
develop
over time. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
help desk
.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself
without posting a request to
Articles for creation
.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
leaving us some feedback
.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong
(
talk
) 17:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Dear F.Alexsandr,
Thank you for reviewing my article and commenting. I have made changes from your suggestions (added more sources) and I also added more content from reading these sources. Can you please review it again? Thanks.
Hi
(
talk
) 20:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
6B5 "Ulej"
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as
Start-Class
, which is recorded on its
talk page
. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they
develop
over time. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
help desk
.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself
without posting a request to
Articles for creation
.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
leaving us some feedback
.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Stuartyeates
(
talk
) 23:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Dear F.Alexsandr,
I have edited the article and removed the sources and images. The image now used is an existing Wikimedia image. Can you review it again please?
Hi
(
talk
) 12:27, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
An article you recently created,
Zabralo
, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable
,
independent sources
. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability
is of
central importance
on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace
(with a prefix of "
Draft:
" before the article title) where you can develop the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline
and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks, --?
DreamRimmer
(
talk
) 16:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Oh yes, sorry, my first article creation outside of AFC.
F.Alexsandr
(
talk
) 16:19, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
A tag has been placed on
2S41 Drok
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion
, because it is a redirect from the
article namespace
to a different
namespace
except the
Category
,
Template
,
Wikipedia
,
Help
, or
Portal
namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
contest the nomination
by
visiting the page
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
. ~
Tails
Wx
03:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Note at the top of the assessment request page: “Editors can self-assess articles against the five B-class criteria (FAQ) up to and including C-Class.” The link to the page about the five criteria and other frequently asked questions is
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/B-Class FAQ
. If you assess an article as C class, you will need to show “no” to one of the five criteria on the article talk page. That would likely be completeness of coverage, but could be one of the other four.
An outline of the assessment process overall, for all levels or grades of assessment, is shown at [
[1]
]. There is FAQ information near the bottom of the page.
The assessment template must be used to put an assessment on the article talk page as part of the process. The full template project banner and some explanation and information are at
Template:WikiProject Military history
. The full banner shown on that page is not used in its entirety because only a few task forces would apply to any particular article. I have never seen the portal parameters used. I feel confident in ignoring them.
The linked template information page in the previous paragraph has some information that seems superfluous when you get to know how to place a template. It is a good idea to become familiar with it, however, because it has some useful information which may not be apparent on other pages.
I put the template on talk pages manually because the template link seems to put unnecessary information on the page, including criteria explanation after the criteria numbers. That means a user must be sure to fill in, or eliminate, any parameters or wordings that would not produce an accurate template for a particular article. Some users may put those explanations in with a blank or incomplete project banner as notice of the requirements for each criteria
This is the template that I used on the Zemledeliye (minelaying system) talk page - with nowiki code that is only used here to prevent a full completed template itself from showing on this page. The nowikis are not used on the article talk pages.
{{WPMILHIST|class=B|B1=yes|B2=yes|B3=yes|B4=yes|B5=yes|Russian=yes|Cold-War=yes}} This can be copied and used on other pages. If an article is start or C class, the class item is changed to “start” or “C” and criteria are marked “no” as required for each level. For a stub, “stub” would be show after “class=” and either all the criteria are marked no or they are blank. They don't even need to be listed in a stub template but sometimes they are placed as a convenience for later reviewers.
Military history article assessments are slightly different than the general article assessment criteria and information. If other projects also assess an article, the process and criteria might differ, although they would be mostly the same.
Note that any military history project coordinator can change a self-assessment. An experienced user can do so as well. If the person who self assesses disagrees with such a reassessment, the writer can request that a coordinator perform a further review to decide the appropriate assessment class. The MILHIST bot also assesses articles up to B class. A coordinator runs the bot monthly. I am not sure how the bot picks up unassessed articles to assess. (There is a category for articles needing assessment. The bot may look at that. There may be yet another way the bot finds them. I mention this because I think the bot may not pick up all unassessed military history articles or military history articles where other projects are also interested.) Coordinators can, and every month usually do, downgrade one or more assessments made by the bot.
I should add that there may be situations where a self-assessment as "start" is preferable or more accurate than C. You can ask for a higher assessment (C or B) immediately on the assessment request page if you think it deserves one or use it as a starting point for your own later additions and improvements. Note the requirements, and possible needed upgrading, on the general assessment information pages cited.
If this information is incomplete or not understandable in some respect, let me know. I will try to add to it or reword it.
Donner60
(
talk
) 03:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Thank you very much for indepth explanation
F.Alexsandr
(
talk
) 11:47, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- My proofreading was not up to par. I left out "of" in "outline of assessment." I had "criteria explanations" twice when "criteria numbers" should have been the second phrase in the sentence. I had a stray word "for" which I deleted. Sorry for my lapses in proofreading. I changed the errors. I hope it was understandable enough but if any of the errors and the double criteria explanations error in particular was confusing, it should now be fixed.
Donner60
(
talk
) 05:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
2S39 Magnolia
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as
Start-Class
, which is recorded on its
talk page
. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they
develop
over time. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
help desk
.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself
without posting a request to
Articles for creation
.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
leaving us some feedback
.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Xegma
(talk)
18:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Why did you decline my draft? Most pages like this are copied from the main article (Flag of ...). You can check every page of these list of flags if you want to confirm that I'm saying the right thing. #bodyContent a
Flag Creator
{ background-color: #ffa500; color: #ggggggg; font-weight: monoscope; } 06:34, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation
has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:
?The comment the reviewer left was:
The newly added source looks good, though I have limited access - can you find 1-2 more like it?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
after they have been resolved
.
Rusalkii
(
talk
) 02:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hi F.Alexsandr,
Thank you so much for reviewing the wiki draft and it would be much appreciated if you could provide more details about the references I used in the article.
Would you mind pointing out which reference doesn't have the significant coverage about the subject? It would help me to understand more about why the current refernces don't match the requirement.
Thank you.
Best regards,
-thedoor2009
Thedoor2009
(
talk
) 04:49, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes
vote here
and
here
respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year.
Hawkeye7
?(
talk
·
contribs
) via
MediaWiki message delivery
(
talk
) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Thanks for uploading
File:Татьяна Фрунзе.jpg
. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of
non-free use
. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the
first non-free content criterion
. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have
no free equivalent
; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to
the file description page
and add the text
{{
Di-replaceable non-free use disputed
|<your reason>}}
below
the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing
<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
- On
the file discussion page
, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,
requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license
, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on
this link
. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the
non-free content policy
. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page
. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the
history
of each individual page for details.
Thanks,
FastilyBot
(
talk
) 10:00, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
|
|
Here's a brownie for your efforts
|
Thank you for your participation in the Articles for Creation's
November 2023 Backlog Drive
! You made a total of 8 reviews, for a total of 8 points.
? robertsky
(
talk
) 06:54, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
|
? robertsky
(
talk
) is wishing you
Happy Holidays
! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove
and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user
Happy Holidays
, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy holidays
}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
? robertsky
(
talk
) 06:54, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
M-1952 Flak Jacket
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as
Start-Class
, which is recorded on its
talk page
. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they
develop
over time. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
help desk
.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself
without posting a request to
Articles for creation
.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
leaving us some feedback
.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Cerebellum
(
talk
) 12:37, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hello, F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on
6B6 helmet
.
SunDawn
, while examining this page as a part of our
page curation process
, had the following comments:
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
{{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with
~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the
Page Curation
tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
? SunDawn ?
(contact)
12:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Dear F.Alexsandr,
I have edited the references as per your advice by adding working links into all of them. Can you please review it again? Thank you very much.
Hi
(
talk
) 20:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hello,
I have left you a comment regarding your rejection of my article
Draft:Aaron Lehrian
. You said it does not pass
Wikipedia:MUSICBIO
; however, I believe it passes #7 (Aaron is one of the prominent musicians representing Savannah, GA and the Southeast jazz scene), and definitely passes #9 (he has won first and second places in major international music competitions). Would you mind taking another look?
Beethoven freak
(
talk
) 19:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hello, F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on
Angara-1.2
.
Timothytyy
, while examining this page as a part of our
page curation process
, had the following comments:
Thanks for the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
{{Re|Timothytyy}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with
~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the
Page Curation
tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Timothytyy
(
talk
) 14:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
I have assessed all four articles as B class. I made some copy edits in them which I classify as minor and for clarity. I intended no substantive changes. Please review the articles. If I have made any errors or otherwise changed the meaning of anything in the article or if you disagree with any changes, please remove or further change the changes. Thank you for your work on these articles.
Donner60
(
talk
) 10:34, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Thank you for your input!
F.Alexsandr
(
talk
) 10:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hello, F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on
PE scope
.
SunDawn
, while examining this page as a part of our
page curation process
, had the following comments:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
{{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with
~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the
Page Curation
tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
? SunDawn ?
(contact)
05:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hello, F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on
Ural Works of Civil Aviation
.
SunDawn
, while examining this page as a part of our
page curation process
, had the following comments:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
{{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with
~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the
Page Curation
tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
? SunDawn ?
(contact)
08:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hello, F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on
TVRS-44
.
SunDawn
, while examining this page as a part of our
page curation process
, had the following comments:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
{{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with
~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the
Page Curation
tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
? SunDawn ?
(contact)
08:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hello, F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on
KBS Strelok
.
North8000
, while examining this page as a part of our
page curation process
, had the following comments:
nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
{{Re|North8000}}
.
(Message delivered via the
Page Curation
tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000
(
talk
) 18:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hi F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on
Monument to Warriors-Internationalists
. Another editor,
SunDawn
, has reviewed it as part of
new pages patrol
and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
{{Re|SunDawn}}
.
(Message delivered via the
Page Curation
tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
? SunDawn ?
(contact)
10:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hi, can you please change the last sentence in the deployment section to "Major Illia Yevlash, a spokesman for the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU), *claimed* that Patriot and SAMP/T systems *are capable of destroying* the Zircon in the terminal phase when the Zircon *allegedly* slows to Mach 4.5, *according to Ukraine*"
The source doesn't say that the Patriot actually intercepted the missile, but that it can. So it's misleading. The page is protected so I can't make the edit. This is far more neutral and accurate.
Thanks.
82.0.40.72
(
talk
) 14:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done, thank you.
F.Alexsandr
(
talk
) 14:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
You have recently edited a page related to
the Balkans or Eastern Europe
, a topic designated as
contentious
. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and
does
not
imply that there are any issues with your editing
.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as
contentious topics
. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit
carefully
and
constructively
, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics
procedures
you may ask them at the
arbitration clerks' noticeboard
or you may learn more about this contentious topic
here
. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the
{{
Ctopics/aware
}}
template.
TylerBurden
(
talk
) 16:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hi F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on
ZhZT-71
. Another editor,
SunDawn
, has reviewed it as part of
new pages patrol
and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
{{Re|SunDawn}}
.
(Message delivered via the
Page Curation
tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
? SunDawn ?
(contact)
04:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hi F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on
UMPK (bomb kit)
. Another editor,
SunDawn
, has reviewed it as part of
new pages patrol
and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
{{Re|SunDawn}}
.
(Message delivered via the
Page Curation
tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
? SunDawn ?
(contact)
04:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hi F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on
MP-155
. Another editor,
SunDawn
, has reviewed it as part of
new pages patrol
and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
{{Re|SunDawn}}
.
(Message delivered via the
Page Curation
tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
? SunDawn ?
(contact)
06:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
A tag has been placed on
Soviet and Russian aerial bombs
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion
, because the page appears to be an unambiguous
copyright infringement
. This page appears to be a direct copy from
https://dversam.ru/en/fugasnye-aviabomby.html
,
https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=1223715591&action=compare&url=https%3A%2F%2Fdversam.ru%2Fen%2Ffugasnye-aviabomby.html
, and
https://copypatrol.wmcloud.org/en?id=cf0c892c-d19e-4558-b915-41bedd5fc021
. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of
information
, but not as a source of
sentences
. This part is crucial:
say it in your own words
. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators
will be
blocked from editing
.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image ? which means allowing other people to use it for any reason ? then you
must
verify that externally by one of the processes explained at
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials
. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission
for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at
Wikipedia's copyright policy
for more details, or ask a question
here
.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
contest the nomination
by
visiting the page
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
.
?//?
Timothy
?::?
talk
22:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Greetings! Please don't use unreliable sources in Wikipedia articles, as you did in
[2]
. RIA, Ukrinform and some other sources you used are unreliable. Thanks!
ManyAreasExpert
(
talk
) 19:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Those are not unreliable sources. They are allowed on wikipedia, please stop blanket deleting all russian sources from the page, you give no reason for this.
F.Alexsandr
(
talk
) 19:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Please don't claim they are reliable without proof, thanks!
ManyAreasExpert
(
talk
) 19:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- The burden of proof that they are unreliable is on you. RG.ru and RIA Novosti are cited all over wikipedia, and ВЗГЛЯД.РУ, while dubious, is not a deprecated source, and only quotes a Ukrainian official. The only actual unreliable source you deleted is Lenta.ru. Please restore other citations.
F.Alexsandr
(
talk
) 19:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable sources
WP:RS
, and if you are claiming they are reliable, you need to prove it. RIA is not reliable
WP:RIANOVOSTI
, and other's reliability is dubious.
ManyAreasExpert
(
talk
) 20:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Greetings! Please don't add claims which are not found in reliable sources, as you did in
[3]
. Thanks!
ManyAreasExpert
(
talk
) 19:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hello. Your edits removing categories of Russian war crimes and murder in Ukraine are a gross violation of neutrality and POV-pushing, particularly with edit summaries either apparently denying the crimes
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
, or using false edit summaries to hide the categories' removal
[10]
[11]
[12]
. If you continue this I will report you to
WP:ANI
. These are not the edits of someone
here to build an encyclopedia
. If you have an issue with the categories start a discussion, and if you feel like you need to change ten articles maybe it's not them the ones that have an issue. Maybe you have the problem.
Super
Ψ
Dro
11:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hi F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on
Kronshtadt Sirius
. Another editor,
SunDawn
, has reviewed it as part of
new pages patrol
and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
{{Re|SunDawn}}
.
(Message delivered via the
Page Curation
tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
? SunDawn ?
(contact)
15:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hi F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on
Kronshtadt Helios-RLD
. Another editor,
SunDawn
, has reviewed it as part of
new pages patrol
and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
{{Re|SunDawn}}
.
(Message delivered via the
Page Curation
tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
? SunDawn ?
(contact)
17:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[
reply
]