2004 film series by Richard Denton
The Atheism Tapes
is a 2004
BBC
television documentary series presented by
Jonathan Miller
. The material that makes up the series was originally filmed in 2003 for another, more general series,
Atheism: A Rough History of Disbelief
, but was too lengthy for inclusion. Instead, the BBC agreed to create
The Atheism Tapes
as a supplementary series of six programmes, each consisting of an extended interview with one contributor.
Programmes
[
edit
]
![[icon]](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1c/Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg/20px-Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg.png) | This section
needs expansion
. You can help by
adding to it
.
(
June 2008
)
|
All six programmes were conducted in the form of interviews; the synopses below are summaries of the interviewees' responses to Miller's questions.
Colin McGinn
[
edit
]
English
philosopher
McGinn
speaks about the various reasons for not believing in God, and some of the reasons for. He gives a thorough treatment of the
ontological argument
. In addition, McGinn draws an important distinction between atheism (lack of belief in a deity) and antitheism (active opposition to theism); he identifies himself as both an atheist and an antitheist. Finally, he speculates about a post-theistic society.
Steven Weinberg
[
edit
]
American
physicist
Weinberg
talks about the effectiveness of the
Design Argument
, both in the past and today. He also discusses the reasons that people become religious, including the varying influences of
physical
and biological arguments against religion. Miller connects this to a higher likelihood of biologists being non-believers than physicists, which Weinberg finds surprising.
Weinberg goes on to distinguish between harm done
in the name of
religion from that done
by
religion and states that both of these are very real and very dangerous. He goes on to discuss the difference between religious belief in America and Europe, and about how he doesn't like the "character" of the monotheistic God. He ends by saying that science is very definitely corrosive to religious belief, and that he considers this a good thing.
Arthur Miller
[
edit
]
American
playwright
Arthur Miller
talks about his atheism from a
Jewish
perspective. He discusses his view that some cases of
antisemitism
come from
Christians
who believe Jewish people are disbelievers because they do not believe Christ was the son of God. They also discuss the overlay of religion and patriotism, particularly with American politics, but also on how many of the wars today come from the mixture of nationalism and religious beliefs. Lastly, he explains how he does not believe that there is an afterlife except in the sense that people are remembered by the material possessions that they leave behind or the deeds that they did during their life that still affect the world.
Richard Dawkins
[
edit
]
English biologist
Richard Dawkins
first talks about how the view that evil exists may come from a
personification
of some principal belief. Next, he explains the process by which he became an atheist despite being raised as an
Anglican
. They then discuss at length natural selection and how it acts as the guiding force for evolution. He also points out the fallacy in using a
God-of-the-gaps
argument for explaining the world. Next, he goes over the importance of holding and defending an atheist world view.
Denys Turner
[
edit
]
British theologian
Denys Turner
points out that being an atheist or theist depends largely upon what questions you ask yourself. He then shares his view that atheism can also suffer from its own sort of
fundamentalism
. They spend some time covering the issue of why or how something comes from nothing.
Daniel Dennett
[
edit
]
American philosopher
Dennett
explains why he called one of his books
Darwin's Dangerous Idea
, and why many of Darwin's contemporaries, in particular, considered Darwin's theory of evolution to be dangerous. He goes on to deal with the question of consciousness (i.e., is the consciousness/soul distinct from the body), talking about Darwin's rejection of the soul and the possible origins and psychological purposes of a belief in an immaterial soul.
Next, he talks about his Christian upbringing and how he became an atheist. He goes on to ask why it is thought rude to criticise religious belief, and suggests that it is due to the influential status of the religions in question. He finishes by wondering whether we could live effectively in a post-theistic world.
External links
[
edit
]
|
---|
|
Books
| |
---|
Related works
| |
---|
Documentaries
| |
---|
See also
| |
---|
|