한국   대만   중국   일본 
Template talk:Fargo TV - Wikipedia Jump to content

Template talk : Fargo TV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconTelevision : Stations Template?class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Television , a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs . If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion . For how to use this banner template, see its documentation .
Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by the Television stations task force .

Merging templates... [ edit ]

Ok, why merge the Fargo and Grand Forks templates? Also, why make this the real template and the Grand Forks template just a redirect to this one? I think that at the very least this template should be reamed so it doesn't put such an emphasis on Fargo. -- Matth e w UND ( talk ) 02:47, 17 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]

I still don't like the idea of Fargo and Grand Forks having just one template called "Fargo TV". The two cities have their own lineup of channels. I would like to go back to having a template for both markets. -- Matth e w UND ( talk ) 09:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]

I'm assuming they merged (redirected) the GF template to the Fargo template because the Grand Forks is a part of the Fargo market, though they do have different stations.-- grejlen - talk 02:33, 14 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]

That was a good idea of splitting up the template into which the area the station(s) target, Raccoon Fox . I'm doing that in the Western ND market since they have a mult-city structure also.-- grejlen - talk 21:02, 28 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
I disagree. Merging was a bad idea, the Grand Forks template should be restored - there are some commonalites between Fargo and Grand Forks but not enough to merit this mess. -- AlexWCovington ( talk ) 04:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]