From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This template is within the scope of
WikiProject Ohio
, which collaborates on
Ohio
-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page
, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current
discussions
.
Ohio
Wikipedia:WikiProject Ohio
Template:WikiProject Ohio
Ohio articles
| | Template
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment
scale.
|
|
| This template is within the scope of
WikiProject Companies
, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies
on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion
and see a list of open tasks.
Companies
Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies
Template:WikiProject Companies
company articles
| | Template
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment
scale.
| WikiProject Companies To-do:
|
---|
|
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
| |
|
|
| This template is within the scope of
WikiProject Journalism
, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
journalism
on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion
and see a list of open tasks.
Journalism
Wikipedia:WikiProject Journalism
Template:WikiProject Journalism
Journalism articles
| | Template
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment
scale.
|
|
| This template is within the scope of
WikiProject Newspapers
, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Newspapers
on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion
and see a list of open tasks.
Newspapers
Wikipedia:WikiProject Newspapers
Template:WikiProject Newspapers
Newspapers articles
| | Template
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment
scale.
|
|
Could someone remove all the locations and crap from this template so it is more readable? --
CFIF
23:32, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
[
reply
]
I would like to see this template stay, does anyone know how hard I worked on it.
And, I'm not an experienced user...
I apologize for any inconvenience and I'm sure we can work this out in ways that both sides will consider to be comfortable... --
User:WIKISCRIPPS2005
UTC 11:32 | EST 18:32 FRI FEB 03 2006
Please leave the template as it is...
I would really appreciate it!!!
Thank you for your cooperation!!!
WIKISCRIPPSUltimate
SAT MAR 04 2006 9:15 PM EST / SUN MAR 05 2006 2:15 AM UTC
Hi, I've no objection to the template in general but redlinked employee roll-calls are not really suitable for articles or templates. Removed accordingly. Any notable (
WP:BIO
) staff who have a separate wikipedia article could be added.
Dei
zio
02:22, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Please check out
WP:CONTEXT
for a guideline to redlinks. If these people are notable then by all means create articles about them. Bluelinked, notable personnel are absolutely fine, however an entirely redlinked list of people of unknown position and importance is entirely unencyclopedic. You clearly have an interest in this topic, and are likely an employee of the company, which is a particularly clear reason why you should be keen not to give the impression that you "own" the template.
Template:News Corporation
gets away with a much shorter list of staff with a few redlinked employees, however Scripps is not News corp, ditto the template for General Electric Co. I'm aware that several media and other companies have lists of mainly redlinked staff on their template, however it's very unusual not to see at least the CEO and a couple of others with articles. I've also been unable to find a policy or guideline which backs up your previous edit summary, I will of course have no objections if you could point it out to me. Thanks,
Dei
zio
02:44, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- So... 15 months and still not one bluelinked person on the template?
Dei
z
talk
13:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
[
reply
]