From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[
unreliable source?
]
Usage
This template is intended to be used when a statement is sourced but it is questionable whether the source used is
reliable
for supporting the statement. It produces a superscripted notation like the following:
- It was actually written by Francis Bacon.
[9]
[
unreliable source?
]
Articles tagged with this template will be categorized into
Category:All articles lacking reliable references
.
Place this template inline,
{{Unreliable source?|date=June 2024}}
following the questionable source. The template should be placed
outside and immediately after the reference
to the questionable source (
<ref> ... </ref>
), within the article's text:
- Potentially controversial statement.
<ref>some alleged source for this</ref>{{Unreliable source?|date=June 2024}}
Next sentence.
Parameters
The template has the following optional parameters:
- date
: should be set to the month and year when the article was tagged. Example:
{{
Unreliable source?
|date=June 2024}}
- reason
: a note explaining why you think the source is unreliable as per
WP:RS
. Displays as a tool tip. Keep it short (one sentence) as longer material belongs on the talk page. It is good to reiterate the reason in your edit summary. Example:
{{Unreliable source?|reason=
Your WP:RS-based reason here.
|date=June 2024}}
- sure
or
certain
: if set to "y" or "yes" will remove the question mark from the template's output to denote a degree of certainty that the source is unreliable. Please use this with a
|reason=
parameter, and only after a good faith attempt to verify the reliability of the source in question. Example:
{{
Unreliable source?
|sure=y|reason=
Your WP:RS-based reason here.
|date=June 2024}}
NOTE: This parameter has an alias,
|failed=
, which may make more grammatical sense when used with certain redirects like
{{
verify credibility
}}
.
When to use and not use this template
This template should be used to express your doubt about the credibility of a source.
This tag should not be used on
unreliably sourced contentious statements about living persons
; if a source for such a statement is not reliable, the statement and the source should be
removed immediately
.
For whole articles or article sections that rely on suspect sources, considering using the banner template
{{
More citations needed
}}
or
{{
More citations needed section
}}
, respectively, rather than individually tagging a large number of statements.
For sources promoting
fringe theories and pseudo-science
, the more specific template
{{
Unreliable fringe source
}}
can be used. Even more specifically, flag
improperly sourced medical claims
with
{{
Unreliable medical source
}}
.
This tag should not be used to indicate that the sourced material could not be found within a given source. In that case,
{{
failed verification
}}
is a better template. For statements that have failed verification
and
have a questionable would-be source, consider removal of the source (and possibly the statement) over using both tags.
TemplateData
Template parameters
[
Edit template data
]
This template prefers inline formatting of parameters.
Parameter
| Description
| Type
| Status
|
---|
Reason
| reason
| Note explaining why you think the source is unreliable as per WP:RS. Displays as a tool tip
| String
| optional
|
---|
Certain?
| certain
sure
failed
| If set to "y" or "yes" will remove the question mark from the template's output to denote a degree of certainty that the source is unreliable
- Default
- no
- Example
- yes
| Boolean
| optional
|
---|
Month and year
| date
| Month and year of tagging; e.g., 'January 2013', but not 'jan13'
- Auto value
{{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}
| String
| suggested
|
---|
Displayed tag text
| name
| Text displayed by the in-line tag between the square brackets
- Default
- unreliable source?
| String
| optional
|
---|
See also
Inline templates
Lists of templates
Policies, guidelines, essays, and WikiProjects
Inline cleanup tags
|
---|
Attribution
| |
---|
Clarity
| |
---|
Miscellaneous
| |
---|
Neutrality
| |
---|
Precision
| |
---|
Time-sensitivity
| |
---|
Verifiability
| Dubious
| |
---|
Bare URLs
| |
---|
Incomplete or broken citation
| |
---|
Missing or problematic reference
| |
---|
|
---|
Wording
| |
---|
General advice
| |
---|
|