From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a4/Symbol_start_class.svg/35px-Symbol_start_class.svg.png) |
![WikiProject icon](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Stanford_torus_square_476_px.png/80px-Stanford_torus_square_476_px.png) | This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Futures studies
, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Futures studies
on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion
and see a list of open tasks.
Futures studies
Wikipedia:WikiProject Futures studies
Template:WikiProject Futures studies
futures studies articles
| | High
| This article has been rated as
High-importance
on the
importance scale
.
|
|
![WikiProject icon](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7a/Nuvola_apps_kcmsystem.svg/80px-Nuvola_apps_kcmsystem.svg.png) | This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Technology
, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
technology
on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion
and see a list of open tasks.
Technology
Wikipedia:WikiProject Technology
Template:WikiProject Technology
Technology articles
| | C
| This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
|
|
|
--
14.99.158.43
(
talk
) 04:51, 29 November 2015 (UTC)==Tone and references==
[
reply
]
This article currently reads like a personal essay and features no references, both seemingly in violation of Wikipedia's
no original research
policy. For example, a
Google search
for "
projection to absurdity
" ? a recently added link ? returned no results.
jareha
18:03, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- personal or not tone is apropriate for me, this article is good overview on subject, but needs more references. I have changed template to
Unreferenced
?The preceding
unsigned
comment was added by
AndriuZ
(
talk
?
contribs
) .
the "alternatives" section seems rather biased. it should either be cut or revised.
83.94.140.83
23:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[
reply
]
This topic is a subtpoic of Management of Technology. There should be a WP entry for MoT.
MetaAnalyst
11:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
[
reply
]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
27 August 2019
and
14 December 2019
. Further details are available
on the course page
. Student editor(s):
Zzw8
.
Above undated message substituted from
Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
by
PrimeBOT
(
talk
) 10:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Might we right or left the TOC and columnize the see also?
Emesee
(
talk
) 08:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
suggestion..............
[
reply
]