From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
| This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Disney
, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
The Walt Disney Company
and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion
and see a list of open tasks.
Disney
Wikipedia:WikiProject Disney
Template:WikiProject Disney
Disney articles
| | Low
| This article has been rated as
Low-importance
on the
project's importance scale
.
|
|
|
Should add in the Disney Channel Original Movies coming soon. Which is;
Teen Beach 2-September 6, 2015
Ma pire journee- September 13, 2015
Le garcon ideal- September 20, 2015
Descendants- September 27, 2015
I will keep you updated if more in announced.
Likeablejake
(
talk
) 19:26, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Not done:
The page's protection level and/or your
user rights
have changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to
edit the page yourself
. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details.
?
?·?
Salvidrim!
?·?
?
14:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
[
reply
]
So is it La chaine Disney or Disney la Chaine? Everything seems to be going both ways; according to the logo, and the CRTC ownership chart for Corus,
it's Disney la Chaine
. Should we go with this?
ViperSnake151
?Talk?
20:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
[
reply
]
I propose that
Teletoon Retro
be merged into
Disney La Chaine
. Reasoning: merge articles so the history of both can be contained within one article because both channels are the same. Teletoon Retro did not shut down, and subsequently Disney La Chaine negotiated carriage rights with television service providers to take over its slot. Teletoon Retro was rebranded Disney La Chaine, using the same CRTC broadcast licence and all TV providers automatically got Disney La Chaine as a result. Therefore, it's the same channel, and to maintain consistency, the articles should be meraged as this is common practice with all other Canadian TV channel articles - when a rebranded occurs, the pages are moved. Examples include
The Biography Channel (Canada)
to
Viceland (Canada)
,
TV Land (Canada)
to
Comedy Gold (TV channel)
,
Talktv
to
MTV (Canada)
,
Canadian Learning Television
to
Oprah Winfrey Network (Canadian TV channel)
, and the list could go on and on. Proof that it was a rebrand can be seen here:
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/publications/reports/BrAnalysis/psp2015/individual/ipsp132.htm
musimax.
(
talk
) 16:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Support
- As per nom. Worth mentioning that at some point
Shaw Cable
dropped this channel from their service. I vaguely remember this happening sometime after the rebranding. I couldn't find any sources for when this occured.
Northwest
(
talk
) 02:10, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Strongest possible oppose:
There is
nothing
in common between these channels other than some legal technicalities. Those examples are simply not relevant as each is fundamentally still the same channel. The only relevant precedent I know of is
Talk:Gusto (TV channel)#Merger Discussion
, so I'm pinging everyone else involved in that discussion:
User:Bearcat
and
User:ViperSnake151
Modernponderer
(
talk
) 10:46, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Neutral
: These discussions have gone either way, but the Gusto situation was different because Gusto already existed before M3 was turned into it via a few business technicalities. In this case, I made it separate mainly for consistency with the article on the new Disney Channel (which by contrast,
was
an entirely new service). It just depends on how awkward it would be to cover it in a merged article.
ViperSnake151
?Talk?
15:04, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Support
. This isn't analogous to the M3/Gusto situation, which was a complex transaction that required different treatment than usual because it represented a
transfer
of programming and branding between two channels that both already existed prior to the transaction, rather than a channel turning into a completely new thing that didn't already exist ? so it was an unusual case with more complex arguments than usual about where it was more natural to split the two previously-existing topics. This is more clearly a conventional rebranding, more analogous to Biography Channel → Viceland or Talktv → MTV than to M3+OldGusto → NewGusto, so it should be handled in the more normal way.
Bearcat
(
talk
) 17:10, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- After thinking about it, I
Support
by virtue of that Corus considers it a rebrand, and so should we for the sake of consistency, even if the programming between the two is radically different. -
BRAINULATOR9
(
TALK
)
17:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Given the discussion above, I was looking into doing this, but then noticed that
Teletoon Retro
is almost an almost identical mirror image of
Teletoon Retro
. It seems awkward to allow this content fork to diverge. I can understand the sensitivity of having two pages while the channels were running, but feel that it would now be better for them to be merged instead, given their closely parallel histories. So, that means that I'm proposing an
alternative target
for the merge.
Klbrain
(
talk
) 12:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Support alternative target
while the suggested merger would be unecessary due to the small overlap between the articles (different programing), merging the French and English version of the channel does seems appropriate since there is significantly larger overlap between these two.
Trialpears
(
talk
) 21:30, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Support alternative target
due to overlap, as long as we can keep relevant information from both pages. -
BRAINULATOR9
(
TALK
)
21:23, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
[
reply
]