From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
| This article is within the scope of
WikiProject African diaspora
, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
African diaspora
on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion
and see a list of open tasks.
African diaspora
Wikipedia:WikiProject African diaspora
Template:WikiProject African diaspora
African diaspora articles
| | Low
| This article has been rated as
Low-importance
on the
project's importance scale
.
|
|
| This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Virginia
, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state
of
Virginia
on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion
and see a list of open tasks.
Virginia
Wikipedia:WikiProject Virginia
Template:WikiProject Virginia
Virginia articles
| | Low
| This article has been rated as
Low-importance
on the
project's importance scale
.
|
|
| This article is within the scope of
WikiProject United States
, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America
on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
United States
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States
Template:WikiProject United States
United States articles
| | Low
| This article has been rated as
Low-importance
on the
project's importance scale
.
|
|
|
What is the
- I don't know, but why does he want to do this because it affects the neutrality of the article? Sounds more like poor grammar. --
24.124.87.54
22:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Upon review of this source it does not appear to be reliable. It is written in a fictional, mythological format (would be appropriate as a children's book) and does not contain citations or sources of any kind. Claims based on it have been removed. Any disagreement please post and explain below.
Psmith85
(
talk
) 23:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Yes, it's a book for young readers and should be replaced by a better source. But it was reviewed positively in
Publishers Weekly
and
The New York Times Book Review
, both of which commented on its historical accuracy. ??
Malik Shabazz
Talk
/
Stalk
03:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
[
reply
]