From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
| This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Norway
, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Norway
on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion
and see a list of open tasks.
Norway
Wikipedia:WikiProject Norway
Template:WikiProject Norway
Norway articles
| |
|
|
Template:Computer Magazines
has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page
. Thank you. --
Fourohfour
13:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- (Notice included here to get attention of unbiased cross-section of potentially interested parties. TfDs and this template don't seem to get much attention on their own, but this template appears in lots of articles.)
Fourohfour
13:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Despite the popularity of this magazine, I've not yet found a reliable secondary source that talks of the magazine itself. Editors should try hard to identify such to forestall potential nomination for deletion. --User:Ceyockey (
talk to me
) 02:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Ceyockey, lead here by example: try harder.
68.161.231.44
(
talk
) 13:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
[
reply
]
The article on the "Horizon Awards" was successfully nominated for
procedural deletion
between 15-20 November 2008. However the Awards appear at least marginally notable so I have merged the content into this page. I didn't include the extensive list of previous winners (which can be seen
here
) as they would overwhelm this short article and can just as easily be viewed at the Computerworld website.
On the surface this appears an uncontroversial merge, but if there are any disagreements please raise them here so a consensus can be reached either way.
Euryalus
(
talk
) 21:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
[
reply
]
a large portion of the articles in the magazine are political. Anyone else here actually read this thing? Or are they just assuming a revert is easier?
??Preceding
unsigned
comment added by
Mostly home
(
talk
?
contribs
) 20:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Don't know about it being PRESENTLY or even RECENTLY political, but it was important weekly reading for computer professionals, meaning IBM Mainframe & DeBunch people. Even if what you say is true, then make this a history-of article.
Pi314m
(
talk
) 21:53, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- quick update to above: yes, they do top-100-this and top-100-that, trends in Cloud-job salaries, but they also keep readers posted about stuff like NYTimes.com being hacked in 2009, BBC hacked in 2016. Is that to be called political?
Pi314m
(
talk
) 23:11, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
[
reply
]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Computerwoche (0170-5121)
and has thus listed it
for discussion
. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 5#Computerwoche (0170-5121)
until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
ev
iolite
(talk)
04:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
[
reply
]