|
| This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Law
, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field
and the subjects encompassed by it.
Law
Wikipedia:WikiProject Law
Template:WikiProject Law
law articles
| | Low
| This article has been rated as
Low-importance
on the
project's importance scale
.
|
|
| This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Ireland
, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Ireland
on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion
and see a list of open tasks.
Ireland
Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland
Template:WikiProject Ireland
Ireland articles
| | Low
| This article has been rated as
Low-importance
on the
project's importance scale
.
|
|
|
This is my first draft and needs more work. It doesn't explain adequately that the
Parliament of Ireland
immediately post Restoration had a majority of Puritans and reduced the extent of the King's declaration to Ormond. The Act of Explanation needs a lot more work. --
Red King
14:00, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hi, have to point out an inaccuracy here. The Act of 1652 doesn't say everyone has to leave eastern Ireland regardless of political or religious affiliation. What is says (paragraphs VI, VII VIII) is that anyone who fought against the parliament would lose some lands.
- If they surrendered within the time allowed they would be pardoned for their life, but lose up to two thirids of their estates.
- If they didn't surrender within the time allowed they could stand to lose all their lands and even their lives.
- If they were "of the Popish religion" and had not taken any part in the wars they would still lose a thrid of their lands unless they had actually fought for the parliament.
In practice Protestant royalists cold avoid confisaction by paying fines, Catholics could not. One other point, the act only applied to landowners. Although some Parliamentarians talked about deported all of the Irish to Connacht, in fact, they only ever got arouind to the land owning class.
Jdorney
- I think you just volunteered to revise it! (You've already done most of it!) --
Red King
14:45, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
God damn it...!
Ok
Jdorney
- Great! Now all you have to do is explain what the King promised Ormonde (to request the Act), what was the composition of the Irish Parliamment of the time so they chopped it back, what happened when the Irish Royalists went to Westminster to whinge about not getting the full deal etc etc.?:)
--
Red King
11:06, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Holy sh..! What a can of worms! Ok I'll get on it. i'll have to look up some books though
Jdorney
- Quite! There are various sources on the net, but they contradict each other and sometimes even contradict themselves! And very PPOV too. --
Red King
19:54, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Ok, I've done some of that work. Couldn't find the exact terms of the act - ie who was named. Most of the info comes from the "Jacobite Ireland". I've also made a start on articles about the earlier colonisation in
Turdor re-conquest of Ireland
and
Plantations of Ireland
, both of them still need a bit of work, especially the second one, which only has an intro so far.
Jdorney
14:09, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
That should be
Tudor re-conquest of Ireland
There is a conflict between this article, under "Background": "When the
Long Parliament
in London passed the Act of Settlement 1652" and the article by that name ("Act for the Settlement of Ireland 1652") which says: "The act was passed on 12 August 1652 by the
Rump Parliament
of England"
Hedles
(
talk
) 10:20, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Rump Parliament
says
The Rump Parliament is the name of the English Parliament after Colonel Pride purged the Long Parliament on 6 December 1648
so by 1652 the Long Parliament was defunct. Well spotted. The source was wrong. I shall fix it. --
Red King
(
talk
) 18:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
[
reply
]
The unkinde desertor by French isn't about the King, it's about the 1st Duke of Ormond.
132.230.124.52
(
talk
) 13:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Act of Settlement 1662
. Please take a moment to review
my edit
. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ
for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
checked
parameter below to
true
or
failed
to let others know (documentation at
{{
Sourcecheck
}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018
, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
InternetArchiveBot
. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification
using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
{{
source check
}}
(last update: 5 June 2024)
.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool
.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool
.
Cheers.?
InternetArchiveBot
(
Report bug
)
15:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
[
reply
]