From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a4/Symbol_start_class.svg/35px-Symbol_start_class.svg.png) |
![WikiProject icon](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/ba/Cartoon_Network.svg/50px-Cartoon_Network.svg.png) | This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Cartoon Network
, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
Cartoon Network
on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion
and see a list of open tasks.
Cartoon Network
Wikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon Network
Template:WikiProject Cartoon Network
Cartoon Network articles
| | Low
| This article has been rated as
Low-importance
on the
project's importance scale
.
|
|
|
http://www.history.com/minisite.do?content_type=Minisite_Generic&content_type_id=1253&display_order=1&sub_display_order=2&mini_id=1290
which is not the same one that Huey mentions. Although pointing out the true history of Christmas is useful, it is more detremental than good if it is done wrong.--
X37
09:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- The historical accuracy of Huey’s account is irrelevant to the topic at hand. The only thing pertinent to the synopsis of this episode is that he delivered a version of the history of Christmas that was subsequently ignored by Granddad. Though the explanation may seem equivocal to some, this is an expected outcome, and it is not necessary or appropriate to contend the character’s argument in a setting such as this. This isn’t an article debating the history of Christmas; it is an article that explains the events of this episode.
?
GrittyLobo441
15:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
[
reply
]
I understand that, but then Huey's explination shouldn't be reffered to as "true", which is where the emphasis in my concern lay. To illustrate the point, if someone in something made a factual error and I was explaining what that someone said, I would not say that they said something was true.--
X37
03:02, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
[
reply
]
The article itself says that it premiered on December 18th, but the box to the right sys it premiered on December 26th. Does anybody know which is correct?
?The preceding
unsigned
comment was added by
Ron Stoppable
(
talk
?
contribs
) 22:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC).
[
reply
]
- Thanks for pointing this out. The correct date is the 18th.
?
GrittyLobo441
19:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Is there a reason this doesn't link to the primary source (i.e., the episode itself) on the Adult Swim website?
?Preceding
unsigned
comment added by
74.3.18.178
(
talk
) 18:19, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
[
reply
]