Sanskrit verse in Anustubh metre
Shloka
or
?loka
(
Sanskrit
:
?????
?loka
, from the root
????
?ru
,
lit.
'
hear
'
[1]
[2]
in a broader sense, according to Monier-Williams's dictionary, is "any verse or stanza; a proverb, saying";
[3]
but in particular it refers to the 32-syllable verse, derived from the
Vedic
anu??ubh
metre, used in the
Bhagavad Gita
and many other works of classical Sanskrit literature.
[4]
In its usual form it consists of four
p?das
or quarter-verses, of 8 syllables each,
[5]
or (according to an alternative analysis) of two half-verses of 16 syllables each.
[2]
The metre is similar to the
Vedic
anu??ubh
metre, but with stricter rules.
The
?loka
is the basis for Indian epic poetry, and may be considered the Indian verse form
par excellence
, occurring as it does far more frequently than any other metre in classical
Sanskrit poetry
.
[2]
The
?loka
is the verse-form generally used in the
Mahabharata
, the
Ramayana
, the
Puranas
,
Smritis
, and scientific treatises of Hinduism such as
Sushruta Samhita
and
Charaka Samhita
.
[7]
[8]
The
Mahabharata
, for example, features many verse metres in its chapters, but 95% of the stanzas are
?lokas
of the
anu??ubh
type, and most of the rest are
tristubh
s.
The
anu??ubh
is found in Vedic texts, but its presence is minor, and
tri??ubh
and
g?yatr?
metres dominate in the
Rigveda
.
[10]
A dominating presence of
?lokas
in a text is a marker that the text is likely post-Vedic.
[7]
The traditional view is that this form of verse was involuntarily composed by
V?lm?ki
, the author of the
R?m?ya?a
, in grief on seeing a hunter shoot down one of two birds in love.
[3]
On seeing the sorrow (?oka) of the widowed bird, he was reminded of the sorrow S?t? felt on being separated from Shri Rama and began composing the Ramayana in shlokas. For this he is called the ?dikavi (first poet.)
[11]
Metrical pattern
[
edit
]
Each 16-syllable
hemistich
(half-verse),
of two 8-syllable
p?das
, can take either a
pathy?
("normal") form or one of several
vipul?
("extended") forms. The form of the second
foot
of the first
p?da
(II.) limits the possible patterns the first foot (I.) may assume.
The scheme below, given by Macdonell, shows his understanding of the form of the
?loka
in the classical period of Sanskrit literature (4th?11th centuries CE):
In poems of the intermediate period, such as the
Bhagavad Gita
, a fourth
vipul?
is found. This occurs 28 times in the Bhagavad Gita, that is, as often as the third
vipul?
.
[12]
When this
vipul?
is used, there is a word-break (caesura) after the fourth syllable:
[13]
- |
u
u
u
?, | ? u ?
u
||
Two rules that always apply are:
[13]
- 1. In both
p?das
, in syllables 2?3, u u is not allowed.
- 2. In the second
p?da
, in syllables 2?4, ? u ? is not allowed
The
pathy?
and
vipul?
half-verses are arranged in the table above in order of frequency of occurrence. Out of 2579 half-verses taken from
Kalidasa
,
Bharavi
,
Magha
, and
Bilhana
, each of the four admissible forms of
?loka
in this order claims the following share: 2289, 116, 89, 85;
[14]
that is, 89% of the half-verses have the regular
pathy?
form.
The various
vipul?
s, in the order above, are known to scholars writing in English as the first, second, third and fourth
vipul?
,
[15]
or the
paeanic
,
choriambic
,
molossic
, and
trochaic
vipul?
respectively.
[16]
In Sanskrit writers, they are referred to as the
na-
,
bha-
,
ma-
, and
ra-vipul?
.
[13]
A fifth
vipul?
, known as the minor Ionic, in which the first
p?da
ends | u u ? x |, is sometimes found in the
Mah?bh?rata
, although rarely.
[17]
Macdonell's chart given above is in fact too restrictive with regard the first four syllables in a
vipul?
verse. For example, the first quarter verse of the
R?maya?a
(critical edition) contains a
na-vipul?
and scans ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (
tapa?sv?dhy?yanirata?
). Other examples are easy to find among classical poets, e.g.,
R?macarita
1.76
manyur deh?vadhir aya?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?. In the ma-vipul?, a caesura is not obligatory after the fifth syllable, e.g.,
?i?up?lavadha
2.1a
yiyak?am??en?h?ta?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?.
Noteworthy is the avoidance of an iambic cadence in the first
p?da
. By comparison, syllables 5?8 of any
p?da
in the old Vedic
anu??ubh
metre typically had the iambic ending u ? u x (where "x" represents an
anceps
syllable).
Statistical studies examining the frequency of the
vipul?
s and the patterns in the earlier part of the
p?da
have been carried out to try to establish the preferences of various authors for different metrical patterns. It is believed that this may help to establish relative dates for the poems, and to identify interpolated passages.
[18]
[19]
Examples
[
edit
]
A typical
?loka
is the following, which opens the
Bhagavad Gita
:
- dharma-k?etre kuru-k?etre
- samavet? yuyutsava?
- m?mak?? p???av?? caiva
- kim akurvata sanjaya
- | ? ? ? ? | u ? ? ? |
- | u u ? ? | u ? u ? ||
- | ? u ? ? | u ? ? u |
- | u u ? u | u ? u u ||
- "(
Dh?tara??ra
said:) In the place of righteousness, at
Kuruk?etra
,
- gathered together and desiring battle,
- my sons and the sons of Pandu,
- what did they do, Sanjaya?"
From the period of high classical Sanskrit literature comes this benediction, which opens
B??abha??a
's biographical poem
Har?acaritam
(7th century CE):
- namas-tu?ga-?ira?-cumbi- candra-c?mara-c?rave /
- trailokya-nagar?rambha- m?la-stambh?ya ?ambhave //
- | u ? ? u | u ? ? u | ? u ? u | u ? u ? ||
- | ? ? u u | u ? ? u | ? ? ? ? | u ? u ? ||
- "Praise be to ?ambhu, beautified by the
chowrie
moon touching his lofty head;
- like a foundation pillar of a city that is the universe."
[20]
When a
?loka
is recited, performers sometimes leave a pause after each
p?da
, at other times only after the second
p?da
. (See External links.)
Difference between shloka and mantra
[
edit
]
A Shloka has to be composed in a specific metre (chhanda), with a specific number of lines with a specific number of words per line, each word could be a mantra. For example, vi??u sahastran?ma is in anu??up chhanda (two lines of four words each).
A mantra, on the other hand, is prefixed by omkara (primordial sound) and suffixed by the essential nama (name) and the salutary word
nama
(salutation) between the prefix and the suffix. No metre is prescribed. The lyrics in any V?rnic or matric metres are shlokas, but stanzas from Vedic hymns are not shloka, despite it being a common mistake to think this.
[21]
See also
[
edit
]
References
[
edit
]
- ^
Sanskrit Slokas With Meaning in Hindi
- ^
a
b
c
Macdonell, Arthur A.,
A Sanskrit Grammar for Students
, Appendix II, p. 232 (Oxford University Press, 3rd edition, 1927).
- ^
a
b
Monier Monier-Williams (1923).
A Sanskrit-English Dictionary
. Oxford University Press. pp. 1029?1030.
- ^
For other definitions see:
"????? (zloka) - KST (Online Sanskrit Dictionary)"
.
kosha.sanskrit.today
. Retrieved
2023-04-23
.
- ^
W. J. Johnson (2010),
Oxford Dictionary of Hinduism
.
- ^
a
b
Friedrich Max Muller (1860).
A History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature
. Williams and Norgate. pp.
67
?70.
- ^
Vishwakarma, Richa; Goswami, PradipKumar (2013).
"A review through Charaka Uttara-Tantra"
.
AYU
.
34
(1): 17?20.
doi
:
10.4103/0974-8520.115438
.
PMC
3764873
.
PMID
24049400
.
- ^
Kireet Joshi (1991).
The Veda and Indian Culture: An Introductory Essay
. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 101?102.
ISBN
978-81-208-0889-8
.
- ^
Vyas, Jaldhar H. (2004-03-10).
"[Advaita-l] Difference bet. slokas and Mantras"
. Retrieved
2020-01-19
.
- ^
Morton Smith, R. (1961).
?lokas and Vipulas
.
Indo-Iranian Journal
Vol. 5, No. 1 (1961), pp. 19-35.
- ^
a
b
c
Michael Hahn
:
"A brief introduction into the Indian metrical system for the use of students"
.
- ^
Macdonell, Arthur A.,
A Sanskrit Grammar for Students
, Appendix II, p. 233 (Oxford University Press, 3rd edition, 1927)
- ^
Keith (1920), p. 421.
- ^
Morton Smith (1961), p. 19.
- ^
Hopkins, p. 222.
- ^
Morton Smith (1961).
- ^
Brockington (1998), pp. 117?130.
- ^
Translation from Daniel H. Ingalls (translator) (1965):
Sanskrit Poetry, from Vidy?kara's Treasury
. (Harvard).
- ^
Yelle, Robert A. (2004-03-01).
Explaining Mantras
.
doi
:
10.4324/9780203483381
.
ISBN
9780203483381
.
Bibliography
[
edit
]
- Arnold, Edward Vernon (1905).
Vedic Metre in its historical development
. Cambridge University Press (Reprint 2009).
ISBN
978-1113224446
.
- Brockington, John (1998).
The Sanskrit Epics
. Brill.
- Brown, Charles Philip
(1869).
Sanskrit prosody and numerical symbols explained
. London: Trubner & Co.
- Colebrooke, H.T. (1873). "On Sanskrit and Prakrit Poetry".
Miscellaneous Essays
. Vol. 2. London: Trubner and Co. pp. 57?146.
- Coulson, Michael (1976).
Teach Yourself Sanskrit
. Teach Yourself Books. Hodder and Stoughton.
- D'Avella, Victor B. (2019)
"Notes on the Sanskrit
?loka
"
. (Introduction to Ala?k?ra??stra Sommersemester 2019.)
- Keith, A. Berriedale (1928).
A History of Sanskrit Literature
. (Oxford University Press).
- Hopkins, E.W. (1901). "Epic versification".
The Great Epic of India
. New York: C. Scribner's Sons.
- Muller, Friedrich Max
;
Arthur Anthony Macdonell
(1886).
A Sanskrit grammar for beginners
(2 ed.). Longmans, Green. p.
178
.
PDF
- Murthy, G. S. S. (2003).
"Characterizing Classical Anu??up: A Study in Sanskrit Prosody"
.
Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute
, Vol. 84 (2003), pp. 101?115. (On JSTOR)
- Sharma, Arvind (2000).
"Of
??dras
,
S?tas
, and
?lokas
: Why is the
Mah?bh?rata
preeminently in the
Anu??ubh
Metre?"
.
Indo-Iranian Journal
, Vol. 43, No. 3 (2000), pp. 225?278.
- Wilson, Horace Hayman (1841).
An introduction to the grammar of the Sanskrit language
. Madden.
External links
[
edit
]