Germanic tribe
The
Chamavi
,
Chamaves
or
Chamaboe
(
Χαμαβο?
) were a
Germanic tribe
of
Roman imperial
times whose name survived into the
Early Middle Ages
. They first appear under that name in the 1st century AD
Germania
of
Tacitus
as a
Germanic tribe
that lived to the north of the
Lower Rhine
. Their name probably survives in the region today called
Hamaland
, which is in the
Gelderland
province of the
Netherlands
, between the
IJssel
and
Ems
rivers.
Etymology
[
edit
]
The Germanic name of the Chamavi has been reconstructed as
*Hamawiz
, whereby the
ham-
element is generally taken to refer to alluvial land near an
estuary
; in this case those of the rivers
IJssel
and
Rhine
. In this interpretation the tribal name could be translated as "those who dwell on enclosed pieces of land near the river mouth". Another explanation refers to Proto-Germanic
*hamiþja
"corps, skin" (related to
Old Norse
hamr
"shell, skin, shape" and
Gothic
hamon
"shirt") that described a "piece of clothing or covering". In Old-Norse paganism, the
hamr
was associated with death and shape-shifting. The Dutch words
lichaam
("body", literally a "shape/likeness a "covering") and
ham
"afterbirth" are related to the same root. The tribal name might, therefore, refer to war garments. Less commonly accepted etymologies connect the Chamavi to
hamo-
, possibly an early Germanic loan of
Latin
hamus
, meaning
fishhook
, making the tribesmen into "fishermen"; or, altetively, a Proto-Germanic
*hamu-
"lame, being hemmed".
[1]
[2]
Location and historical mentions
[
edit
]
According to
Velleius Paterculus
, in 4 BC, Tiberius crossed the Rhine and attacked, in sequence, the Chamavi,
Chattuari
, and
Bructeri
implying that the Chamavi lived west of the other two named tribes. The Bructeri lived between the
Ems
and
Lippe
, so the Chamavi also probably lived west of the Ems.
[3]
Tacitus reports in his
Annals
that in the time of
Nero
(apparently 58 AD), the
Angrivarii
, having been ejected from their homes further to the north, pleaded with Rome to allow them to live in a military buffer zone on the northern bank of the Rhine, saying that "these fields belonged to the Chamavi; then to the
Tubantes
; after them to the
Usipii
".
[4]
These fields, being on the Rhine between
IJssel
and
Lippe
, were to the south of modern Hamaland, and to the west of the Bructeri. In this passage he does not explain where the Chamavi had moved to.
In his
Germania
, Tacitus reported that the Chamavi and
Angrivarii
had moved, apparently recently in his time (around 100 AD) into the lands of the
Bructeri
,
the Bructeri having been expelled and utterly destroyed by an alliance of neighboring peoples...
.
[5]
The Bructeri lived in the area between the
Lippe
and
Ems
rivers, to the southeast of modern
Hamaland
, which is to the west of the Ems. Tacitus also reports that to the north of the Chamavi and Angrivarii lived "the
Dulgubini
and
Chasuarii
, and other tribes not equally famous".
[6]
To their south then were the
Tencteri
, at that time between the Rhine and the
Chatti
.
[7]
(The Bructeri however continue to appear in the record and apparently moved south.)
Ptolemy
in his
Geographia
(2.10), mentions several tribal names which could refer to different reports of the Chamavi's position. But the text is notoriously difficult to unravel:
- Ptolemy describes the peoples between the Frisians and Chauci on the
North Sea
coast, and the more nomadic and newly arrived
Suebic
nations who he describes (unusually) as now living in a band from their more well-known locations near the Elbe all the way to the Rhine, where he places at least part of the Suebic
Langobardi
. From west to east: Between the
Frisians
and the Rhine, he places the lesser
Bructeri
; between the Ems and
Weser
rivers he places the greater Bructeri, and the "
Chaimai
"; and between Weser and
Elbe
, the Angrivarii, "Laccobardi" (probably Langobardi, and this is a more normal place for them to be reported living), and
Dulgubnii
. These "Chaimai" are therefore neighbours of the Angrivarii, Chauci, and Dulgubni, roughly matching Tacitus, although the Bructeri have not disappeared. So this passage matches other classical texts.
- On the other hand, coming from the direction of the Elbe, and now south of the Suebian band of peoples, the
Kamauoi
(Latinized to
Camavi
) are mentioned together with the
Cherusci
at "Mount Melibocus", which is thought to be the
Harz mountains
. Both are said to be "under", meaning south of, the
Calucones
, who lived on both side of the Elbe. Matching the Harz, the Elbe is also to the west, where the "Bainochaimai" live. Although these Cherusci are close to where other texts report them, this is quite far to the east of Hamaland, and also somewhat to the east of the land of the Bructeri. So this is an unusual placement to be reported for the Chamavi.
- In a third place, when describing the tribes south of the band of Suevi, and east of the Abnobian mountains running parallel to the Rhine, apparently coming from the west this time, Ptolemy mentions first that "under" the most westerly Suevi are, apparently from north to south, the
Chasuarii
, then Nertereani, then Danduti, then the Turoni and Marvingi, then under the Marvingi, the Curiones, then
Chattuari
, as far as the Danube and the Parmaecampi. The next apparent north to south series starts not with Suevi but with the
Camavi
(presumably the ones in the Harz mountains, who are described as being south of the Suebi) "under" whom are the
Chatti
and
Tubanti
, and then between these and the Sudetes mountains, thought to be the
Ore Mountains
, the Teuriochaemae (an otherwise unknown name, but in the place previously inhabited by the
Hermanduri
and later by the
Thuringii
, with these three names often thought to be equivalent).
[8]
Not only the Chamavi, but also the Tubanti, Chasuarii, and Chattuari, are described by Tacitus and other sources as living much further to the north of the Rhine and the Harz mountains, nowhere near the Danube. The Chatti however, are in approximately the expected place.
In about 293 or 294, according to the
Latin Panegyrics
VIII,
Constantius Chlorus
, had victories in the
Scheldt
delta, and his opponents are often thought to have been Chamavi and
Frisii
, because the author of the text then mentions that as a result, Chamavi and Frisians now plow his land and the price of food is lower. Some also apparently became soldiers, and about 300 the 11th cohort "chamadoroi" were noted in Peamou in Upper Egypt, corresponding to the 11th cohort Chamavi known from the
Notitia Dignitatum
.
[9]
We know the Chamavi were among them because there was a settlement
pagus
(Ch)amavorum
(French; Amous) .
In 313,
Constantine the Great
also defeated Franks near the Rhine. The Panegyric which survives mentions the Bructeri, Chamavi, Cherusci, Lancionae, Alemanni and Tubantes.
[9]
The new name "
Franks
" also started to be used to refer to both Salians, Chamavi, and some other tribes, in this period. On the
Peutinger
map, which dates to as early as the 4th century, is a brief note written in the space north of the Rhine, generally interpreted as
Hamavi qui et Pranci
which is translated as
The Hamavi, who are Franks
.
In the 350s there were many conquests claimed by emperor
Julian
against Franks on the Rhine. In the winter of 357/358 he defeated plundering Salians and Chamavi on the Maas river, and left the Salians in Roman territory because of their permission to live there, but forced the Chamavi to leave.
[10]
Unlike the Salii, these Chamavi were expelled from Roman lands, though they clearly lived close by, where their grain was disappointingly unready for Roman use.
[11]
In an apparent description of the same events, Zosimus does not mention the Chamavi, but a Saxon group known as the "Kouadoi", a Greek spelling of "
Quadi
", which some authors believe might be a misunderstanding for the Chamavi. According to him, this tribe had pushed into Batavia, displacing the Salians.
[12]
In 392 AD, according to a citation by
Gregory of Tours
,
Sulpicius Alexander
reported that
Arbogast
crossed the Rhine to punish the "Franks" for incursions into Gaul. He first devastated the territory of the
Bricteri
, near the bank of the Rhine, then the Chamavi, apparently their neighbours. Both tribes did not confront him. The
Ampsivarii
and the
Chatti
however were under military leadership of the Frankish princes
Marcomer
and
Sunno
and they appeared "on the ridges of distant hills". At this time the Bructeri apparently lived near
Cologne
. Note that the Chamavi and the Ampsivarii are the two peoples that Tacitus had long before noted as having conquered the Bructeri from their north. This description would place the lands of the Chamavi still close to the old Bructeri lands.
Gregory of Tours
also mentions the Chamavi as having been among the Franks.
The
Lex Chamavorum Francorum
is the modern name of a Frankish legal code known from the 9th century, which was official under
Charlemagne
. It is not clear whether it was really intended to refer to Chamavi.
[13]
See also
[
edit
]
References
[
edit
]
- ^
Neumann, Gerhard (1981),
"Chamaver"
, in Johannes Hoops (ed.),
Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde
, vol. 4, p. 368,
ISBN
9783110065138
- ^
M. Philippa et al. (2003-2009)
Etymologisch Woordenboek van het Nederlands
, 4 vol., Amsterdam, keywords:
ham "alluvial land"
,
haam, ham "afterbirth"
,
haam "fishnet"
,
haam "fishhook"
.
- ^
Lanting; van der Plicht (2010),
"De
14
C-chronologie van de Nederlandse Pre- en Protohistorie VI: Romeinse tijd en Merovingische periode, deel A: historische bronnen en chronologische schema's"
,
Palaeohistoria
, 51/52: 62,
ISBN
9789077922736
- ^
Tac. Ann. 13.55
- ^
Tac. Ger. 33
- ^
Tac. Ger. 34
- ^
Tac. Ger. 32
- ^
"Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography (1854), TEURIOCHAEMAE"
.
- ^
a
b
Nixon, C. E. V.; Rodgers, Barbara Saylor (1994-01-01).
In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: The Panegyrici Latini
. University of California Press.
ISBN
978-0-520-08326-4
.
- ^
Lanting; van der Plicht (2010) p.67
- ^
Ammianus Marcellinus,
Res Gestae
,
Book XVII-8
- ^
Zosimus
Nova Historia
Book III
- ^
Text:
here
, but there are doubts, see for example
here
.
Sources
[
edit
]