The causes of
World War II
have been given considerable attention by historians. The immediate precipitating event was the
invasion of Poland
by
Nazi Germany
on September 1, 1939, and the subsequent declarations of war on Germany made by
Britain
and
France
, but many other prior events have been suggested as ultimate causes. Primary themes in historical analysis of the war's origins include the political takeover of
Germany
in 1933 by
Adolf Hitler
and the
Nazi Party
;
Japanese militarism
against
China
, which led to the
Japanese invasion of Manchuria
and the
Second Sino-Japanese War
;
Italian
aggression against
Ethiopia
, which led to the
Second Italo-Ethiopian War
; or
military uprising
in
Spain
, which led to the
Spanish Civil War
.
During the
interwar period
, deep anger arose in the
Weimar Republic
over the conditions of the 1919
Treaty of Versailles
, which punished Germany for
its role
in
World War I
with heavy financial
reparations
and severe limitations on its military that were intended to prevent it from becoming a military power again. The
demilitarisation
of the
Rhineland
, the prohibition of German unification with
Austria
, and the loss of its overseas colonies as well as some 12% of its pre-war land area and population all provoked strong currents of
revanchism
in German politics.
During the worldwide economic crisis of the
Great Depression
in the 1930s, many people lost faith in liberal democracy and countries across the world turned to authoritarian regimes.
[1]
In Germany, resentment over the terms of the Treaty of Versailles was intensified by the instability of the German political system, as many on both the Right and the Left rejected the Weimar Republic liberalism. The most extreme political aspirant to emerge from that situation was
Adolf Hitler
, the leader of the Nazi Party. The Nazis
took totalitarian power in Germany
from 1933 and demanded the undoing of the Versailles provisions. Their ambitious and aggressive domestic and foreign policies reflected their ideologies of
antisemitism
,
unification of all Germans
, the acquisition of "living space" (
Lebensraum
) for agrarian settlers, the elimination of
Bolshevism
and the hegemony of an "
Aryan
"/"
Nordic
"
master race
over "subhumans" (
Untermenschen
) such as
Jews
and
Slavs
. Other factors leading to the war included the aggression by
Fascist Italy
against Ethiopia, militarism in
Imperial Japan
against
China
, and
Nationalists
fighting against
Republicans
for control of
Spain
.
At first, the aggressive moves met with only feeble and ineffectual policies of
appeasement
from the other major world powers. The
League of Nations
proved helpless, especially regarding China and Ethiopia. A decisive proximate event was the 1938
Munich Conference
, which formally approved Germany's annexation of the
Sudetenland
from Czechoslovakia. Hitler promised it was his last territorial claim, nevertheless in early 1939, he became even more aggressive, and European governments finally realised that appeasement would not guarantee peace but by then it was too late.
Britain and France rejected diplomatic efforts to form a military alliance with the Soviet Union, and Hitler instead offered Stalin a better deal in the Molotov?Ribbentrop Pact of August 1939. An alliance formed by Germany, Italy, and Japan led to the establishment of the
Axis powers
.
Ultimate causes
[
edit
]
Legacies of World War I
[
edit
]
By the end of
World War I
in late 1918, the world's social and geopolitical circumstances had fundamentally and irrevocably changed. The
Allies
had been victorious, but many of Europe's economies and infrastructures had been devastated, including those of the victors. France, along with the other victors, was in a desperate situation regarding its economy, security and morale and understood that its position in 1918 was "artificial and transitory".
[2]
Thus, French Prime Minister
Georges Clemenceau
worked to gain French security via the Treaty of Versailles, and French security demands, such as reparations, coal payments, and a demilitarised Rhineland, took precedence at the
Paris Peace Conference of 1919?1920
,
[2]
which designed the treaty. The war "must be someone's fault ? and that's a very natural human reaction", analysed the historian
Margaret MacMillan
.
[3]
Germany
was charged with the sole responsibility of starting World War I, and the
War Guilt Clause
was the first step to satisfying revenge for the victor countries, especially France, against Germany. Roy H. Ginsberg argued, "France was greatly weakened and, in its weakness and fear of a resurgent Germany, sought to isolate and punish Germany... French revenge would come back to haunt France during the Nazi invasion and occupation twenty years later".
[4]
The two main provisions of the French security agenda were
war reparations
from Germany in the form of money and coal and a detached German
Rhineland
. The German (Weimar Republic) government printed excess currency, which created inflation, to compensate for the lack of funds, and it borrowed money from the United States. Reparations from Germany were needed to stabilise the French economy.
[5]
France also demanded for Germany to give France its coal supply from the
Ruhr
to compensate for the destruction of French coal mines during the war. The French demanded an amount of coal that was a "technical impossibility" for the Germans to pay.
[6]
France also insisted on the
demilitarisation
of the German Rhineland in the hope of hindering any possibility of a future German attack and giving France a physical security barrier between itself and Germany.
[7]
The inordinate amount of reparations, coal payments and the principle of a demilitarised Rhineland were largely viewed by the Germans as insulting and unreasonable.
The resulting
Treaty of Versailles
brought a formal end to the war but was judged by governments on all sides of the conflict. It was neither lenient enough to appease Germany nor harsh enough to prevent it from becoming a dominant continental power again.
[8]
The German people largely viewed the treaty as placing the blame, or "war guilt", on Germany and
Austria-Hungary
and as punishing them for their "responsibility", rather than working out an agreement that would assure long-term peace. The treaty imposed harsh
monetary reparations
and requirements for demilitarisation and
territorial dismemberment
, caused mass ethnic resettlement and separated millions of ethnic Germans into neighbouring countries.
In the effort to pay war reparations to Britain and France, the
Weimar Republic
printed trillions of marks, which caused
hyperinflation
. Robert O. Paxton stated, "No postwar German government believed it could accept such a burden on future generations and survive...".
[5]
Paying reparations to the victorious side had been a traditional punishment with a long history of use, but it was the "extreme immoderation" that caused German resentment. Germany did not make its last World War I reparation payment until 3 October 2010,
[9]
92 years after the end of the war. Germany also fell behind its coal payments because of a
passive resistance
movement against France.
[10]
In response, the French invaded the Ruhr and occupied it. By then, most Germans had become enraged with the French and placed the blame for their humiliation on the Weimar Republic.
Adolf Hitler
, a leader of the Nazi Party, attempted a coup d'etat in 1923 in what became known as the
Beer Hall Putsch
, and he intended to establish a
Greater Germanic Reich
.
[11]
Although he failed, Hitler gained recognition as a
national hero
by the German population.
During the war,
German colonies
outside Europe had been annexed by the Allies, and Italy took the
southern half
of
Tyrol
after the armistice. The
war in the east
had ended with the defeat and the collapse of the
Russian Empire
, and German troops had
occupied large parts
of
Eastern
and
Central Europe
with varying degrees of control and established various
client states
such as a
kingdom of Poland
and the
United Baltic Duchy
. The
German Navy
spent most of the war in port, only to be turned over to the Allies. It was scuttled by its own officers to avoid it from being surrendered. The lack of an obvious military defeat would become one of the pillars holding together the
Dolchstosslegende
("stab-in-the-back myth"), which gave the Nazis another propaganda tool.
The demilitarised
Rhineland
and the additional cutbacks on military also infuriated the Germans. Although France logically wanted the Rhineland to be a neutral zone, France had the power to make their desire happen, which merely exacerbated German resentment of the French. In addition, the Treaty of Versailles dissolved the German general staff, and possession of navy ships, aircraft, poison gas, tanks and heavy artillery was also made illegal.
[7]
The humiliation of being bossed around by the victor countries, especially France, and being stripped of their prized military made the Germans resent the Weimar Republic and idolise anyone who stood up to it.
[12]
Austria also found the treaty unjust, which encouraged Hitler's popularity.
The conditions generated bitter resentment towards the war's victors, who had promised the Germans that US President
Woodrow Wilson
's
Fourteen Points
would be a guideline for peace; but the Americans had played only a minor role in the war, and Wilson could not convince the Allies to agree to adopt his Fourteen Points. Many Germans felt that the German government had agreed to an
armistice
based on that understanding, and others felt that the
German Revolution of 1918?1919
had been orchestrated by the "
November criminals
", who later assumed office in the new Weimar Republic. The Japanese also started to express resentment against
Western Europe
for how they were treated during the negotiations of the Treaty of Versailles. The Japanese proposition to discuss the issue of racial equality was not put in the final draft because of many other Allies, and the Japanese participation in the war caused little reward for the country.
[13]
The war's economic and psychological legacies persisted well into the
Interwar period
.
Failure of the League of Nations
[
edit
]
The
League of Nations
was an international peacekeeping organization founded in 1919 with the explicit goal of preventing future wars.
[14]
The League's methods included
disarmament
,
collective security
, the settlement of disputes between countries by negotiations and diplomacy and the improvement of global welfare. The diplomatic philosophy behind the League represented a fundamental shift in thought from the preceding century. The old philosophy of "concert of nations", which grew out of the
Congress of Vienna
(1815), saw Europe as a shifting map of alliances among
nation-states
, which created a
balance of power
that was maintained by strong armies and secret agreements. Under the new philosophy, the League would act as a government of governments, with the role of settling disputes between individual nations in an open and legalist forum. Despite Wilson's advocacy, the United States never joined the League of Nations.
The League lacked an armed force of its own and so depended on member nations to enforce its resolutions, uphold economic sanctions that the League ordered or provide an army when needed for the League to use. However, individual governments were often very reluctant to do so. After numerous notable successes and some early failures in the 1920s, the League ultimately proved incapable of preventing aggression by the
Axis Powers
in the 1930s. The reliance upon unanimous decisions, the lack of an independent body of armed forces and the continued self-interest of its leading members meant that the failure was arguably inevitable.
[15]
[16]
Expansionism and militarism
[
edit
]
Expansionism
is the doctrine of expanding the territorial base or economic influence of a country, usually by means of military aggression.
Militarism
is the principle or policy of maintaining a strong
military
capability to use aggressively to expand national interests and/or values, with the view that military efficiency is the supreme ideal of a state.
[17]
The Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations had sought to stifle expansionist and militarist policies by all actors, but the conditions imposed by their creators imposed on the world's new geopolitical situation and the technological circumstances of the era only emboldened the re-emergence of those ideologies during the Interwar Period. By the early 1930s, militaristic and aggressive national ideologies prevailed in
Germany
,
Japan
and
Italy
.
[18]
The attitude fuelled advancements in military technology, subversive propaganda and ultimately territorial expansion. It has been observed that the leaders of countries that have been suddenly militarised often feel a need to prove that their armies are formidable, which was often a contributing factor in the start of conflicts such as the
Second Italo-Ethiopian War
and the
Second Sino-Japanese War
.
[19]
In Italy,
Benito Mussolini
sought to create a
New Roman Empire
, based around the
Mediterranean
. Italy invaded
Ethiopia
as early as 1935,
Albania
in early 1938, and later
Greece
. The invasion of Ethiopia provoked angry words and a failed oil embargo from the League of Nations.
Spazio vitale
("living space") was the territorial
expansionist
concept of
Italian Fascism
. It was analogous to Nazi Germany's concept of
Lebensraum
and the
United States'
concept of "
Manifest Destiny
". Fascist ideologist
Giuseppe Bottai
likened this historic mission to the deeds of the
ancient Romans
.
[20]
Under the Nazi regime, Germany began its own program of expansion that sought to restore its "rightful" boundaries. As a prelude toward its goals, the
Rhineland
was
remilitarised in March 1936
.
[21]
Also of importance was the idea of a
Greater Germany
, supporters of which hoped to unite the
German people
under one nation-state to include all territories inhabited by Germans, even if they happened to be a minority in a particular territory. After the Treaty of Versailles, a unification between Germany and the newly formed
German-Austria
, a
rump state
of
Austria-Hungary
, was blocked by the Allies, despite the large majority of
Austrians
supporting the idea.
During the Weimar Republic (1919?1933), the
Kapp Putsch
, an attempted
coup d'etat
against the republican government, was launched by disaffected members of the armed forces. Later, some of the more radical militarists and nationalists were submerged in grief and despair into the Nazi Party, and more moderate elements of militarism declined. The result was an influx of militarily-inclined men into the Nazi Party. Combined with its racial theories, that fuelled
irredentist
sentiments and put Germany on a collision course for war with its immediate neighbours.
In Asia, the
Empire of Japan
harboured expansionist desires towards
Manchuria
and the
Republic of China
. Two contemporaneous factors in Japan contributed both to the growing power of its military and the chaos in its ranks before World War I. One was the
Cabinet
Law, which required the
Imperial Japanese Army
(IJA) and the
Imperial Japanese Navy
(IJN) to nominate cabinet members before changes could be formed. That essentially gave the military a veto power over the formation of any Cabinet in the ostensibly-parliamentary country. The other factor was
gekokuj?
, the institutionalized
disobedience
by junior officers. It was common for radical junior officers to press their goals to the extent of assassinating their seniors. In 1936, the phenomenon resulted in the
February 26 Incident
in which junior officers attempted a coup d'etat and killed leading members of the Japanese government. In the 1930s, the
Great Depression
wrecked Japan's economy and gave radical elements within the Japanese military the chance to force the entire military into working towards the conquest of all of Asia.
For example, in 1931, the
Kwantung Army
, a Japanese military force stationed in
Manchuria
, staged the
Mukden Incident
, which sparked the
invasion of Manchuria
and its transformation into the Japanese puppet state of
Manchukuo
.
Germans vs. Slavs
[
edit
]
Twentieth-century events marked the culmination of a millennium-long process of intermingling between Germans and
Slavic people
. The rise of nationalism in the 19th century made race a centerpiece of political loyalty. The rise of the nation-state had given way to the politics of identity, including
pan-Germanism
and
pan-Slavism
. Furthermore,
Social Darwinist
theories framed the coexistence as a "Teuton vs. Slav" struggle for domination, land, and limited resources.
[22]
Integrating these ideas into their own worldview, the Nazis believed that the Germans, the "
Aryan race
", were the
master race
and that the
Russians
and
Poles
were inferior.
[23]
Japan's seizure of resources and markets
[
edit
]
Other than a few coal and iron deposits and a small oil field on
Sakhalin Island
, Japan lacked strategic mineral resources. In the early 20th century, in the
Russo-Japanese War
, Japan had succeeded in pushing back the East Asian expansion of the Russian Empire in competition for
Korea
and
Manchuria
.
Japan's goal after 1931 was economic dominance of most of East Asia, often expressed in the
Pan-Asian
terms of "Asia for the Asians".
[24]
Japan was determined to dominate the China market, which the US and other European powers had been dominating. On October 19, 1939, US Ambassador to Japan
Joseph C. Grew
, in a formal address to the America-Japan Society, stated that
the new order in East Asia has appeared to include, among other things, depriving Americans of their long established rights in China, and to this the American people are opposed.... American rights and interests in China are being impaired or destroyed by the policies and actions of the Japanese authorities in China.
[25]
In 1931, Japan
invaded Manchuria
and China proper. Under the guise of the
Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere
, with slogans such as "Asia for the Asians!", Japan sought to remove the Western powers' influence in China and replace it with Japanese domination.
[26]
[27]
The ongoing conflict in China led to a deepening conflict with the US in which public opinion was alarmed by events such as the
Nanking Massacre
and growing Japanese power. Lengthy talks were held between the US and Japan. The Japanese
invasion of the south
of
French Indochina
made President
Franklin Roosevelt
freeze all Japanese assets in the US. The intended consequence was to halt oil shipments from the US to Japan, which supplied 80 percent of Japanese oil imports. The Netherlands and Britain followed suit.
With oil reserves that would last only a year and a half during peacetime and much less during wartime, the
ABCD line
left Japan two choices: comply with the US-led demand to pull out of China or seize the oilfields in the
East Indies from the Netherlands
. The Japanese government deemed it unacceptable to retreat from China.
[28]
Mason-Overy debate: "Flight into War" theory
[
edit
]
In the late 1980s, the British historian
Richard Overy
was involved in a historical dispute with
Timothy Mason
that played out mostly over the pages of the
Past and Present
journal over the reasons for the outbreak of the war in 1939. Mason had contended that a "flight into war" had been imposed on Hitler by a structural economic crisis, which confronted Hitler with the choice of making difficult economic decisions or aggression. Overy argued against Mason's thesis by maintaining that Germany was faced with economic problems in 1939, but the extent of those problems could not explain aggression against
Poland
and the reasons for the outbreak of war were the choices made by the Nazi leadership.
Mason had argued that the German working-class was always against the Nazi dictatorship; that in the overheated German economy of the late 1930s, German workers could force employers to grant higher wages by leaving for another firm and so grant the desired wage increases and that such a form of political resistance forced Hitler to go to war in 1939.
[29]
Thus, the outbreak of the war was caused by structural economic problems, a "flight into war" imposed by a domestic crisis.
[29]
The key aspects of the crisis were, according to Mason, a shaky economic recovery that was threatened by a rearmament program that overwhelmed the economy and in which the regime's nationalist bluster limited its options.
[29]
In that way, Mason articulated a
Primat der Innenpolitik
("primacy of domestic politics") view of the war's origins by the concept of
social imperialism
.
[30]
Mason's
Primat der Innenpolitik
thesis was in marked contrast to the
Primat der Außenpolitik
("primacy of foreign politics"), which is usually used to explain the war.
[29]
Mason thought German foreign policy was driven by domestic political considerations, and the launch the war in 1939 was best understood as a "barbaric variant of social imperialism".
[31]
Mason argued, "Nazi Germany was always bent
at some time
upon a major war of expansion".
[32]
However, Mason argued that the timing of such a war was determined by domestic political pressures, especially as relating to a failing economy, and had nothing to do with what Hitler wanted.
[32]
Mason believed that from 1936 to 1941, the state of the German economy, not Hitler's "will" or "intentions", was the most important determinate on German foreign policy decisions.
[33]
Mason argued that the Nazi leaders were so deeply haunted by the November 1918
German Revolution
that they were most unwilling to see any fall in working-class living standards for fear of provoking a repetition of the revolution.
[33]
Mason stated that by 1939, the "overheating" of the German economy caused by rearmament, the failure of various rearmament plans produced by the shortages of skilled workers, industrial unrest caused by the breakdown of German social policies and the sharp drop in living standards for the German working class forced Hitler into going to war at a time and a place that were not of his choosing.
[34]
Mason contended that when faced with the deep socio-economic crisis, the Nazi leadership had decided to embark upon a ruthless foreign policy of "smash and grab" to seize territory in Eastern Europe that could be pitilessly plundered to support the living standards in Germany.
[35]
Mason described German foreign policy as driven by an opportunistic "next victim" syndrome after the
Anschluss
in which the "promiscuity of aggressive intentions" was nurtured by every successful foreign policy move.
[36]
Mason's considered the decision to sign the
Molotov?Ribbentrop Pact
and to attack Poland despite the risk of a war against Britain and France to be the abandonment by Hitler of his foreign policy program outlined in
Mein Kampf
and to have been forced on him by his need to stop a collapsing German economy by seizing territory abroad to be plundered.
[34]
For Overy, the problem with Mason's thesis was that it rested on the assumption that in a way that was not shown by the records, information was passed on to Hitler about Germany's economic problems.
[37]
Overy argued for a difference between economic pressures induced by the problems of the
Four Year Plan
and economic motives to seize raw materials, industry and foreign reserves of neighbouring states as a way of accelerating the plan.
[38]
Overy asserted that Mason downplayed the repressive German state's capacity to deal with domestic unhappiness.
[37]
Finally, Overy argued that there is considerable evidence that Germany felt that it could master the economic problems of rearmament. As one civil servant put it in January 1940, "we have already mastered so many difficulties in the past, that here too, if one or other raw material became extremely scarce, ways and means will always yet be found to get out of a fix".
[39]
Proximate causes
[
edit
]
Nazi dictatorship
[
edit
]
Hitler and his Nazis took full control of Germany in 1933?34 (
Machtergreifung
), turning it into a
dictatorship
with a highly hostile outlook toward the Treaty of Versailles and Jews.
[40]
It solved its unemployment crisis by heavy military spending.
[41]
Hitler's diplomatic tactics were to make seemingly-reasonable demands and to threaten war if they were not met. After concessions were made, he accepted them and moved onto a new demand.
[42]
When opponents tried to appease him, he accepted the gains that were offered and went to the next target. That aggressive strategy worked as Germany pulled out of the League of Nations (1933), rejected the Versailles Treaty, began to rearm with the
Anglo-German Naval Agreement
(1935), won back the Saar (1935), re-militarized the Rhineland (1936), formed an alliance ("axis") with Mussolini's Italy (1936), sent massive military aid to Franco in the Spanish Civil War (1936?39), seized Austria (1938), took over Czechoslovakia after the British and French appeasement of the
Munich Agreement
of 1938, formed a peace pact with Stalin's Russia in August 1939 and finally invaded Poland in September 1939.
[43]
Remilitarization of the Rhineland
[
edit
]
In violation of the Treaty of Versailles and the spirit of the
Locarno Pact
and the
Stresa Front
, Germany remilitarized the Rhineland on March 7, 1936, by moving German troops into the part of western Germany in which according to the Versailles Treaty, they were not allowed. Neither France nor Britain was prepared to fight a
preventive war
to stop the violation and so there were no consequences.
[44]
Italian invasion of Abyssinia
[
edit
]
Following the
Stresa Conference
and even as a reaction to the
Anglo-German Naval Agreement
, the Italian dictator
Benito Mussolini
attempted to expand the
Italian Empire
in Africa by invading the
Ethiopian Empire
, also known as the Abyssinian Empire. The
League of Nations
declared Italy to be the aggressor and imposed sanctions on oil sales, which proved ineffective. Italy annexed Ethiopia in May 1936 and merged Ethiopia,
Eritrea
and
Somaliland
into a single colony, known as
Italian East Africa
. On June 30, 1936, Ethiopian Emperor
Haile Selassie
gave a stirring speech before the League of Nations denouncing Italy's actions and criticizing the world community for standing by. He warned, "It is us today. It will be you tomorrow". As a result of the League's condemnation of Italy, Mussolini declared the country's withdrawal from the organization.
[45]
Spanish Civil War
[
edit
]
Between 1936 and 1939, Germany and Italy lent support to the
Nationalists
led by general
Francisco Franco
in Spain, and the Soviet Union supported the existing democratically elected government, the
Spanish Republic
, led by Manuel Azana. Both sides experimented with new weapons and tactics. The League of Nations was never involved, and its major powers remained neutral and tried with little success to stop arms shipments into Spain. The Nationalists eventually defeated the Republicans in 1939.
[46]
Spain
negotiated with joining
the Axis but remained neutral during World War II and did business with both sides. It also sent a
volunteer unit
to help the Germans against the Soviets. The Spanish Civil War was considered in the 1940s and 1950s to be a prelude to World War II, which was the case to some extent by changing it into an antifascist contest after 1941, but bore no resemblance to the war that started in 1939 and had no major role in causing it.
[47]
[48]
Second Sino-Japanese War
[
edit
]
In 1931, Japan took advantage of China's weakness in the
Warlord Era
and fabricated the
Mukden Incident
in 1931 to set up the puppet state of
Manchukuo
in Manchuria, with Emperor
Puyi
, who had been the last
emperor of China
. In 1937 the
Marco Polo Bridge Incident
triggered the
Second Sino-Japanese War
.
The invasion was launched by the bombing of many cities such as
Shanghai
,
Nanjing
and
Guangzhou
. The latest, which began on 22 and 23 September 1937, called forth widespread protests culminating in a resolution by the Far Eastern Advisory Committee of the League of Nations. The
Imperial Japanese Army
captured the Chinese capital city of Nanjing and committed
war crimes
in the
Nanjing Massacre
. The war tied down large numbers of Chinese soldiers and so Japan set up three different Chinese puppet states to enlist some Chinese support.
[49]
Anschluss
[
edit
]
The
Anschluss
was the 1938 annexation by threat of force of Austria into Germany. Historically,
Pan-Germanism
was the idea of creating a
Greater Germany
to include all
ethnic Germans
into one
nation-state
and was popular in both Austria and Germany.
[50]
The
National Socialist Program
included the idea in one of its points: "We demand the unification of all Germans in the Greater Germany on the basis of the people's right to self-determination."
The
Stresa Front
of 1935 between Britain, France and Italy had guaranteed the independence of Austria, but after the creation of the
Rome-Berlin Axis
, Mussolini was much less interested in upholding its independence.
The Austrian government resisted as long as possible but had no outside support and finally gave in to Hitler's fiery demands. No fighting occurred, most Austrians supported the annexation and Austria was fully absorbed as part of Germany. Outside powers did nothing, and Italy had little reason for continued opposition to Germany and, if anything, was drawn in closer to the Nazis.
[51]
[52]
Munich Agreement
[
edit
]
The
Sudetenland
was a predominantly-German region in
Czechoslovakia
along the border with Germany. It had more than three million ethnic Germans, who comprised almost a quarter of the country's population. In the
Treaty of Versailles
, the region was given to the Czechoslovakia against the wishes of most of the local population. The decision to disregard its right to
self-determination
was based on France's intent to weaken Germany. Much of Sudetenland was industrialised.
[51]
Czechoslovakia had a modern army of 38 divisions, backed by a well-noted armament industry (
?koda
) and military alliances with France and the Soviet Union. However, its defensive strategy against Germany was based on the mountains of the Sudetenland.
Hitler pressed for the Sudetenland's incorporation into Germany and supported German separatist groups within the region. Alleged Czechoslovak brutality and persecution under Prague helped to stir up nationalist tendencies, as did the Nazi press. After the
Anschluss
, all German parties except for the German Social-Democratic Party merged with the
Sudeten German Party
(SdP). Paramilitary activity and extremist violence peaked during the period, and the Czechoslovak government declared martial law in parts of the Sudetenland to maintain order. That only complicated the situation, especially since Slovak nationalism was rising from suspicion towards Prague and encouragement by Germany. Citing the need to protect the Germans in Czechoslovakia, Germany requested the immediate annexation of the Sudetenland.
In the
Munich Agreement
on September 30, 1938, the British, French, and Italian prime ministers appeased Hitler by giving him what he wanted in the hope that it would be his last demand. The powers allowed Germany to move troops into the region and incorporate it into the Reich "for the sake of peace". In exchange, Hitler gave his word that Germany would make no further territorial claims in Europe.
[53]
Czechoslovakia was not allowed to participate in the conference. When the French and British negotiators informed the Czechoslovak representatives about the agreement and that if Czechoslovakia would not accept it, France and Britain would consider Czechoslovakia to be responsible for war and stay neutral, Czechoslovak President
Edvard Bene?
capitulated and Germany took the Sudetenland unopposed.
[54]
Chamberlain's policies have been the subject of intense debate for more than 70 years by academics, politicians and diplomats. The historians' assessments have ranged from condemnation for allowing Hitler's Germany to grow too strong to the judgment that Germany was so strong that it might well win a war and so the postponement of a showdown was in the country's best interests.
[55]
German occupation and Slovak independence
[
edit
]
In March 1939, breaking the Munich Agreement, German troops invaded Prague, and with the Slovaks declaring independence, Czechoslovakia disappeared as a country. The entire ordeal ended the French and British policy of appeasement.
Italian invasion of Albania
[
edit
]
After the German occupation of Czechoslovakia, Mussolini feared for Italy becoming a second-rate member of the Axis. Rome delivered
Tirana
an ultimatum on March 25, 1939, by demanding the accession to Italy's occupation of Albania.
King Zog
refused to accept money in exchange for allowing a full Italian takeover and colonization of Albania.
On April 7, 1939, Italian troops invaded Albania, which was occupied after a three-day campaign with minimal resistance offered by Albanian forces.
Soviet?Japanese border war
[
edit
]
In 1939, the Japanese attacked west from Manchuria into the
Mongolian People's Republic
after the 1938
Battle of Lake Khasan
. They were decisively beaten by Soviet units, under General
Georgy Zhukov
. After the battle, the Soviet Union and Japan were at peace until 1945. Japan looked south to expand its empire, which led to conflict with the United States over the
Philippines
and the control of shipping lanes to the
Dutch East Indies
. The Soviet Union focused on its western border but left 1 million to 1.5 million troops to guard its border with Japan.
Danzig crisis
[
edit
]
After the end of Czechoslovakia proved that Germany could not be trusted, Britain and France decided on a change of strategy. They decided any further unilateral German expansion would be met by force. The natural next target for German expansion was Poland, whose
access to the Baltic sea
had been carved out of
West Prussia
by the Versailles Treaty, which made
East Prussia
an
exclave
. The main port of the area,
Danzig
, had been made into a
free city-state
under Polish influence guaranteed by the League of Nations, a stark reminder to German nationalists of the
Napoleonic free city
that had been established after French Emperor
Napoleon I
's crushing victory over
Prussia
in 1807.
After taking power, the Nazi government made efforts to establish friendly relations with Poland, which resulted in the signing of the ten-year
German?Polish Non-Aggression Pact
with the
Piłsudski
regime in 1934. In 1938, Poland participated in the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia by annexing
Trans-Olza
. In 1939, Hitler claimed
extraterritoriality
for the
Reichsautobahn Berlin-Konigsberg
and a change in Danzig's status in exchange for promises of territory in Poland's neighbours and a 25-year extension of the non-aggression pact. Poland refused for fear of losing its
de facto
access to the sea, subjugation as a German
satellite state
or
client state
and future further German demands.
[56]
[57]
In August 1939, Hitler delivered an
ultimatum
to Poland on Danzig's status.
Polish alliance with the Entente
[
edit
]
The
Franco-Polish Alliance
was the
military alliance
between
Poland
and
France
that was active between the early 1920s and the outbreak of the
Second World War
. The initial agreements were signed in February 1921 and formally took effect in 1923. During the
interwar period
the alliance with Poland was one of the cornerstones of
French foreign policy
.
The
Anglo-Polish Alliance
was formalised by the Anglo-Polish Agreement in 1939, with subsequent
addenda
of 1940 and 1944,
[58]
for mutual assistance in case of a military invasion from
Nazi Germany
, as specified in a secret protocol.
[59]
[60]
[61]
Interwar period
[
edit
]
During the
Polish?Soviet War
of 1920, France, one of the most active supporters of Poland, sent the
French Military Mission to Poland
to aid the Polish army. In early February in Paris, three pacts were discussed by
Polish Chief of State
Jozef Piłsudski
and
French President
Alexandre Millerand
: political, military and economic.
The political alliance was signed there on February 19, 1921 by
Polish Minister of Foreign Affairs
Count
Eustachy Sapieha
and
French Minister of Foreign Affairs
Aristide Briand
, in the background of the negotiations that ended the Polish?Soviet War by the
Treaty of Riga
. The agreement assumed a common foreign policy, the promotion of bilateral economical contacts, the consultation of new pacts concerning Central and Eastern Europe and assistance in case one of the signatories became a victim of an "unprovoked" attack. As such, it was a
defensive alliance
. The secret military pact was signed two days later, on February 21, 1921, and clarified that the agreement was aimed at possible threats from both
Germany
and the
Soviet Union
. An attack on Poland would make France keep lines of communication free and Germany in check but not require it to send troops or to declare war. Both political and military pacts were legally not in force until the economic pact was ratified, which occurred on August 2, 1923.
The alliance was further extended by the Franco?Polish Warrant Agreement, signed on October 16, 1925 in
Locarno
, as part of the
Locarno Treaties
. The new treaty subscribed all previously-signed Polish?French agreements to the system of mutual pacts of the
League of Nations
.
The alliance was closely tied with the Franco-Czechoslovakian Alliance. France's alliances with Poland and
Czechoslovakia
were aimed at deterring Germany from the use of force to achieve a revision of the postwar settlement and ensuring that German forces would be confronted with significant combined strength of its neighbours. Although Czechoslovakia had a significant economy and industry and Poland had a strong army, the French?Polish?Czechoslovakian triangle never reached its full potential. Czechoslovakian foreign policy, under
Edvard Bene?
, avoided signing a formal alliance with Poland, which would force Czechoslovakia to take sides in
Polish?German territorial disputes
. Czechoslovakia's influence was weakened by the doubts of its allies as to the trustworthiness of its army, and Poland's influence was undermined by fighting between supporters and opponents of
Jozef Piłsudski
. France's reluctance to invest in its allies' industry (especially Poland's), improve trade relations by buying their agricultural products and share military expertise further weakened the alliance.
In the 1930s, the alliance remained mostly inactive and its only effect was to keep the
French Military Mission to Poland
, which had worked with the Polish General Staff ever since the Polish?Soviet War of 1919?1920. However, with the German threat becoming increasingly visible in the latter part of the decade, both countries started to seek a new pact to guarantee the independence of all contracting parties and military co-operation in case of a
war with Germany
.
1939
[
edit
]
Finally, a new alliance started to be formed in 1939. The Kasprzycki?Gamelin Convention was signed May 19, 1939 in
Paris
. It was named after
Polish Minister of War Affairs
General
Tadeusz Kasprzycki
and Commander of the
French Army
Maurice Gamelin
. The military convention was army-to-army, not state-to-state, and was not in force legally, as it was dependent on signing and
ratification
of the political convention. It obliged both armies to provide help to each other in case of a war with Germany. In May, Gamelin promised a "bold relief offensive" within three weeks of a German attack.
The treaty was ratified by France on September 4, 1939, on the fourth day of
German offensive on Poland
.
However, France provided only token help to Poland during the war in the form of the
Saar Offensive
, which has often been considered an example of
Western betrayal
. However, the political convention was the basis of the recreation of the
Polish Army in France
.
Piotr Zychowicz quoted the memoirs of the
French ambassador to Poland
,
Leon Noel
, who wrote as early as October 1938, "It is of utmost importance that we remove from our obligations everything that would deprive French government the freedom of decision on the day when Poland finds itself in war with Germany". Foreign Minister
Georges Bonnet
reassured Noel by writing that "our agreement with Poland is full of gaps, needed to keep our country away from war".
| This section
needs expansion
. You can help by
adding to it
.
(
July 2014
)
|
In March 1939, Britain and France guaranteed the independence of Poland. Hitler's claims in the summer of 1939 on Danzig and the Polish Corridor provoked yet another
international crisis
. On August 25, Britain signed the Polish-British Common Defence Pact.
Molotov?Ribbentrop Pact
[
edit
]
Nominally, the
Molotov?Ribbentrop Pact
was a
non-aggression treaty
between Germany and the Soviet Union and was signed in
Moscow
on August 23, 1939, by Soviet Foreign Minister
Vyacheslav Molotov
and German Foreign Minister
Joachim von Ribbentrop
.
In 1939, neither Germany nor the Soviet Union was ready to go to war with each other. The Soviet Union had lost territory to Poland in 1920. Although officially called a "non-aggression treaty," the pact included a secret protocol in which the independent countries of Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania were divided into
spheres of interest
between both the parties. The secret protocol explicitly assumed "territorial and political rearrangements" in those areas.
All of the mentioned countries were invaded, occupied, or forced to cede part of their territory by the Soviet Union, Germany or both. Finland and Romania maintained their independence, however being forced to cede parts of their territory.
The conflict between the Soviet Union and Finland had a great impact of assessing the former's military capabilities by Nazi Germany.
Declarations of war
[
edit
]
Invasion of Poland
[
edit
]
Between 1919 and 1939, Poland had pursued a policy of balancing between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany and agreed to non-aggression pacts with both.
[62]
In early 1939, Germany demanded for Poland to join the
Anti-Comintern Pact
as a satellite state of Germany.
[63]
Poland, fearing a loss of independence, refused. Hitler admitted to his generals on 23 May 1939 that his reason for invading Poland was not Danzig: "Danzig is not the issue at stake. It is a matter of extending our
living space
in the East...".
[64]
To deter Hitler, Britain and France announced that an invasion would mean war and tried to convince the Soviet Union to join in this deterrence. The Soviets, however, gained control of the
Baltic states
and part of Poland by allying with Germany by the secret
Molotov?Ribbentrop Pact
in August 1939. London's attempt at deterrence failed, but Hitler did not expect a wider war. Germany invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, and rejected the British and French demands for it to withdraw, which resulted in both to declare war on September 3, 1939, in accordance with the defence treaties with Poland that they had signed and publicly announced.
[65]
[66]
However neither France nor Britain provided significant military aid to Poland except small operation known as Saar offensive. As of 1 September 1939 Poland was only partially mobilized, which was largely the result of pressure from the British and French ambassadors on the Polish government, fearing a repeat of the mobilization scenario of war from 1914. The Wehrmacht also had advantage in terms of the number of tanks and planes and the technical advancement of its equipment.
On September 17, 1939, the Red Army entered Poland from the east, and the Polish Command decided to abandon the defense of the so-called Romanian Bridgehead and evacuate of all its forces to neighboring countries. The last larger unit of Polish troops capitulated on October 6, 1939, near Kock, but some units went straight to partisan combat. Until the spring of 1940, the resistance of irregular units in the region of the ?wi?tokrzyskie Mountains in central Poland lasted, but the struggle of these units resulted in enormous repressions against the civilian population of the region in which they operated.
Invasion of the Soviet Union
[
edit
]
Germany attacked the Soviet Union in June 1941. Hitler believed that the Soviet Union could be defeated in a fast and relentless assault that capitalised on the Soviets' ill-prepared state and he hoped that his success there would bring Britain to the negotiating table, an event which would end the war altogether.
Attacks on Pearl Harbor, the Philippines, British Malaya, Singapore and Hong Kong
[
edit
]
The US government and general public in general had been supportive of China, condemned European
colonialist policies
and Japan and promoted the so-called
Open Door Policy
. Many Americans viewed the Japanese as an aggressive and/or inferior race. The
Nationalist government
of
Chiang Kai-shek
held friendly relations with the US, which opposed Japan's invasion of China in 1937 and considered it a violation of
international law
and of the
sovereignty
of the
Republic of China
. The US offered the Nationalist government diplomatic, economic and military assistance during its war against Japan. Diplomatic friction between the United States and Japan manifested itself in events like the
Panay incident
in 1937 and the
Allison incident
in 1938.
Reacting to Japanese pressure on French authorities of
French Indochina
to stop trade with China, the US began restricting trade with Japan in July 1940. The end of all oil shipments in 1941 was decisive since the Americans, British and Dutch provided almost all of Japan's oil.
[67]
In September 1940, the
Japanese invaded Vichy French Indochina
and occupied
Tonkin
to prevent China from importing arms and fuel through
French Indochina
along the
Sino-Vietnamese Railway
from the port of
Haiphong
through
Hanoi
to
Kunming
, in
Yunnan
.
[68]
The US decided that the Japanese had now gone too far and decided to force a
rollback
of its gains.
[69]
In 1940 and 1941, the Americans and the Chinese decided to organise a volunteer squadron of American planes and pilots to attack the Japanese from Chinese bases. Known as the
Flying Tigers
, the unit was commanded by
Claire Lee Chennault
. Its first combat came two weeks after the attack on Pearl Harbor.
[70]
Taking advantage of the situation, Thailand launched the
Franco-Thai War
in October 1940. Japan stepped in as a mediator in the war in May 1941 and allowed its ally to occupy the bordering provinces in
Cambodia
and
Laos
. In July 1941, as Operation Barbarossa had effectively neutralised the Soviet threat, the faction of the Japanese military junta supporting the "Southern Strategy" pushed through the occupation of the rest of French Indochina.
The US reacted by seeking to bring the Japanese war effort to a complete halt by imposing a
full embargo on all trade between the United States to Japan
on August 18, 1941, and demanding a Japanese withdrawal of all troops from China and Indochina. Japan was dependent on the United States for 80% of its oil, which resulted in an economic and military crisis for Japan since it could not continue the war effort against China without access to petroleum and oil products.
[71]
On 7 December 1941, without a declaration of war,
[72]
the
Imperial Japanese Navy
attacked Pearl Harbor with the aim of destroying the
main American battle fleet at anchor
. Meanwhile, other
Japanese forces attacked
the American-held
Philippines
and the
British Empire
in
Malaya
,
Singapore
, and
Hong Kong
. The following day, an official Japanese declaration of war on the United States and the British Empire was printed on the front page of all Japanese newspapers' evening editions.
[73]
International time differences caused the announcement to take place between midnight and 3 a.m. on 8 December in North America and at about 8 a.m. on 8 December in the United Kingdom.
Canada declared war on Japan on the evening of 7 December, and a
royal proclamation
affirmed the declaration the next day.
[74]
The
British declared war on Japan
on the morning of 8 December and specifically identified the attacks on Malaya, Singapore and Hong Kong as the cause but omitted any mention of Pearl Harbor.
[75]
The
United States declared war upon Japan
on the afternoon of 8 December, nine hours after the United Kingdom, and identified only "unprovoked acts of war against the Government and the people of the United States of America" as the cause.
[76]
Four days later, the US was brought into the European war when
on December 11, 1941, Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy declared war on the United States
. Hitler chose to declare that the
Tripartite Pact
required Germany to follow Japan's declaration of war although American destroyers escorting convoys and German U-boats had been
de facto
at war in the
Battle of the Atlantic
. The declaration of war effectively ended
US isolationist sentiment
, and the country immediately reciprocated and so formally entered the war in Europe.
[77]
See also
[
edit
]
References
[
edit
]
- ^
Dahl, Robert (1989).
Democracy and Its Critics
. Yale UP. pp.
239?40
.
ISBN
0300153554
.
- ^
a
b
Paxton
, p. 145
- ^
Winter, Jay (2009).
The Legacy of the Great War: Ninety Years On
. University of Missouri Press. p. 126.
ISBN
978-0826218711
.
- ^
Ginsberg, Roy H. (2007).
Demystifying the European Union: The Enduring Logic of Regional Integration
. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 32.
ISBN
9780742536555
.
- ^
a
b
Paxton
, p. 153
- ^
Keynes, John Maynard (1920). "History of World War I".
THE ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF THE PEACE
.
- ^
a
b
Paxton
, p. 151
- ^
"The National Archives Learning Curve | The Great War | Making peace | Reaction to the Treaty of Versailles | Background"
.
www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
. Retrieved
2015-05-30
.
- ^
Crossland, David (2010-09-29).
"Germany Set to Make Final World War I Reparation Payment"
.
ABC News
. Retrieved
16 November
2011
.
- ^
Paxton
, p. 164
- ^
"Beer Hall Putsch"
. Holocaust Encyclopedia
. Retrieved
16 November
2011
.
- ^
Goebbels, Joseph (1941).
"The New Year 1939/40"
.
Die Zeit ohne Beispiel
. Munich: Zentralverlag der NSDAP. pp. 229?239
. Retrieved
16 January
2014
.
- ^
Axelrod, Josh (11 August 2019).
"A Century Later: The Treaty of Versailles and Its Rejection of Racial Equality"
.
NPR
.
- ^
D'Anieri, Paul (2010).
International Politics: Power and Purpose in Global Affairs, Brief Edition
. Cengage Learning. p. 27.
ISBN
978-0495898566
.
- ^
David T. Zabecki, ed. (2015).
World War II in Europe: An Encyclopedia
. Routledge. p. 140.
ISBN
9781135812423
.
- ^
"History of the League of Nations"
. Retrieved
16 January
2014
.
- ^
"the definition of militarism"
.
Dictionary.com
. Retrieved
2015-05-30
.
- ^
Coppieters, Bruno; Fotion, N. (2008).
Moral Constraints on War: Principles and Cases
. Lexington Books. p. 6.
ISBN
9780739121306
.
- ^
"Japanese history: Militarism and World War II"
.
www.japan-guide.com
. 9 June 2002
. Retrieved
2015-05-30
.
- ^
Rodogno, Davide (2006).
Fascism's European Empire: Italian Occupation During the Second World War
. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 46?47.
ISBN
978-0-521-84515-1
.
- ^
"World War 2 Causes"
. History Learning Site
. Retrieved
6 March
2014
.
- ^
Wimmer, Andreas (2012)
Waves of War: Nationalism, State Formation, and Ethnic Exclusion in the Modern World
.
- ^
Burleigh, Michael
(2001)
The Third Reich: A New History
- ^
Hotta, Eri (2007)
Pan-Asianism and Japan's war 1931?1945
. Palgrave Macmillan
- ^
Clark, Joseph (1944).
Ten Years in Japan: a Contemporary Record Drawn from the Diaries and Private and Official Papers of Joseph G. Grew, United States Ambassador to Japan, 1932?1942
. pp. 251?255.
ASIN
B0006ER51M
.
- ^
Best, Antony (2002). "Economic appeasement or economic nationalism? A political perspective on the British Empire, Japan, and the rise of Intra-Asian Trade, 1933?37".
The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History
.
30
(2): 77?101.
doi
:
10.1080/03086530208583142
.
S2CID
153621760
.
- ^
Fisher, Charles A. (1950). "The Expansion of Japan: A Study in Oriental Geopolitics: Part II. The Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere".
The Geographical Journal
.
115
(4/6): 179?193.
Bibcode
:
1950GeogJ.115..179F
.
doi
:
10.2307/1790152
.
JSTOR
1790152
.
- ^
Sugihara, Kaoru (1997). "The Economic Motivations behind Japanese Aggression in the Late 1930s: Perspectives of Freda Utley and Nawa Toichi".
Journal of Contemporary History
.
32
(2): 259?280.
doi
:
10.1177/002200949703200208
.
JSTOR
261244
.
S2CID
152462148
.
- ^
a
b
c
d
Perry, Matt (1999). "Mason, Timothy". In Kelly Boyd (ed.).
The Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writing
. Vol. 2. London: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishing. pp. 780?781.
doi
:
10.4324/9780203825556
.
ISBN
9780203825556
.
S2CID
221608764
.
- ^
Kaillis
, pp. 6?7
- ^
Kaillis
, p. 7
- ^
a
b
Kaillis
, p. 165
- ^
a
b
Kershaw, Ian (2000)
The Nazi Dictatorship
. London: Arnold, p. 88.
ISBN
0340760281
- ^
a
b
Kaillis
, pp. 165?166
- ^
Kaillis
, p. 166
- ^
Kaillis
, p. 151
- ^
a
b
Mason, Tim; Overy, R.J. (1997). "Debate: Germany, 'domestic crisis' and the war in 1939". In Patrick Finney (ed.).
The Origins of The Second World War
. London: Edward Arnold. p. 102.
ISBN
0582304709
.
- ^
Overy, Richard (1999). "Germany, 'Domestic Crisis' and War in 1939". In Christian Leitz (ed.).
The Third Reich
. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 117?118.
ISBN
0631207007
.
- ^
Overy, Richard (1999). "Germany, 'Domestic Crisis' and War in 1939". In Christian Leitz (ed.).
The Third Reich
. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 108.
ISBN
0631207007
.
- ^
Evans, Richard (2006)
The Third Reich in Power
- ^
Tooze, Adam
(2008)
The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy
.
- ^
Record, Jeffrey (2007).
The Specter of Munich: Reconsidering the Lessons of Appeasing Hitler
. Potomac Books, Inc. p. 106.
ISBN
9781597970396
.
- ^
Weinberg, Gerhard.
The Foreign Policy of Hitler's Germany: Diplomatic Revolution in Europe, 1933?36
(vol. 1) (1971);
The Foreign Policy of Hitler's Germany: Starting World War II, 1937?1939
(vol. 2) (University of Chicago Press, 1980)
ISBN
0-226-88511-9
.
- ^
Ripsman, Norrin M.; Levy, Jack S. (2007).
"The Preventive War that Never Happened: Britain, France, and the Rise of Germany in the 1930s"
(PDF)
.
Security Studies
.
16
(1). Informa UK Limited: 32?67.
doi
:
10.1080/09636410701304549
.
S2CID
145796434
.
- ^
Baer, George W.
(1976)
Test Case: Italy, Ethiopia, and the League of Nations
. Hoover Institution Press.
- ^
"Spanish Civil War (1936?1939) ? History of Spain"
.
donQuijote
. Retrieved
2015-05-30
.
- ^
Payne, Stanley G. (2008).
The Spanish Civil War, the Soviet Union, and Communism
. Yale UP. pp. 313?14.
ISBN
978-0300130782
.
- ^
Frank, Willard C. (1987). "The Spanish Civil War and the Coming of the Second World War".
The International History Review
.
9
(3). Informa UK Limited: 368?409.
doi
:
10.1080/07075332.1987.9640449
.
JSTOR
40105814
.
- ^
Gordon, David M. (2006).
"The China?Japan War, 1931?1945"
.
Journal of Military History
.
70
(1): 137?82.
doi
:
10.1353/jmh.2006.0052
.
S2CID
161822140
.
- ^
Gehl, Jurgen (1963)
Austria, Germany, and the Anschluss, 1931?1938
. Oxford University Press.
- ^
a
b
Faber, David (2010)
Munich, 1938: Appeasement and World War II
. pp. 139?68.
ISBN
1439132348
- ^
Wathen, Mary Antonia (1954)
The policy of England and France toward the" Anschluss" of 1938
. Catholic University of America Press.
- ^
Chamberlain's radio broadcast
Archived
2007-06-07 at the
Wayback Machine
, 27 September 1938
- ^
Cole, Robert A. (2010). "Appeasing Hitler: The Munich Crisis of 1938: A Teaching and Learning Resource".
New England Journal of History
.
66
(2): 1?30.
- ^
Roberts, Andrew (November 1, 2019)
"'Appeasement' Review: What Were They Thinking? Britain’s establishment coalesced around appeasement and bared its teeth at those who dared to oppose it."
Wall Street Journal
.
- ^
The German-Polish Crisis (March 27 ? May 9, 1939)
- ^
John Ashley Soames Grenville (2005).
A History of the World from the 20th to the 21st Century
. Routledge. p. 234.
ISBN
978-0-415-28955-9
.
- ^
Lerski, Jerzy Jan (1996).
Historical Dictionary of Poland, 966?1945
. Greenwood Publishing Group.
ISBN
978-0313260070
.
- ^
Paul W. Doerr. 'Frigid but Unprovocative': British Policy towards the USSR from the Nazi-Soviet Pact to the Winter War, 1939.
Journal of Contemporary History
, Vol. 36, No. 3 (Jul., 2001), pp. 423?439
- ^
Keith Sword. "British Reactions to the Soviet Occupation of Eastern Poland in September 1939".
The Slavonic and East European Review
, Vol. 69, No. 1 (Jan., 1991), pp. 81?101.
- ^
Weinberg, Gerhard L. (1954).
Germany and the Soviet Union
. Studies in East European history. Brill Archive. pp. 49?50.
- ^
Rotfeld, Adam Daniel; Torkunow, Anatolij W., eds. (2010).
Białe plamy-czarne plamy: sprawy trudne w polsko-rosyjskich
. Warsaw: Polsko-Rosyjska Grupa do Spraw Trudnych. p. 191.
ISBN
978-83-62453-00-9
.
- ^
Lukacs, John (2001)
The Last European War: September 1939 ? December 1941
. Yale University Press. p. 31.
ISBN
978-0300089158
- ^
"Bericht uber eine Besprechung (Schmundt-Mitschrift)"
.
"Danzig ist nicht das Objekt, um das es geht. Es handelt sich fur uns um die Erweiterung des Lebensraumes im Osten und Sicherstellung der Ernahrung, sowie der Losung des Baltikum-Problems."
- ^
Kochanski, Halik (2012)
The Eagle Unbowed: Poland and the Poles in the Second World War
. Harvard University Press. pp. 34?93.
ISBN
0674284003
- ^
Steiner, Zara (2011)
The Triumph of the Dark: European International History, 1933?1939
. Oxford University Press. pp. 690?92, 738?41.
ISBN
9780199676095
doi
:
10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199676095.001.0001
- ^
Conrad Black (2005).
Franklin Delano Roosevelt: Champion of Freedom
. PublicAffairs. pp. 645?46.
ISBN
9781586482824
.
[
permanent dead link
]
- ^
Smith, Ralph B. (1978). "The Japanese Period in Indochina and the Coup of 9 March 1945".
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
.
9
(2). Cambridge University Press (CUP): 268?301.
doi
:
10.1017/s0022463400009784
.
JSTOR
20062728
.
S2CID
162631136
.
- ^
William L. Langer and S. E. Gleason,
The undeclared war: 1940?1941. Vol. 2
(1953) pp. 9?21.
- ^
Schaller, Michael (1976). "American Air Strategy in China, 1939?1941: The Origins of Clandestine Air Warfare".
American Quarterly
.
28
(1): 3?19.
doi
:
10.2307/2712474
.
JSTOR
2712474
.
- ^
Graham, Euan (2006).
Japan's sea lane security, 1940?2004: a matter of life and death?
Routledge. p. 77.
ISBN
9780415356404
- ^
French, Howard W. (December 9, 1999).
"Pearl Harbor Truly a Sneak Attack, Papers Show"
.
The New York Times
.
- ^
"Japan declares war, 1941 | Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History"
.
- ^
"Canada Declares War on Japan"
.
Inter-Allied Review via
ibiblio
. December 15, 1941
. Retrieved
May 23,
2011
.
- ^
Official Report, House of Commons, 8 December 1941, 5th series, vol. 376, cols. 1358?1359
- ^
"Declaration of War with Japan"
Retrieved 2010-15-07
- ^
See also
United States declaration of war upon Italy
and
United States declaration of war upon Germany (1941)
.
Cited sources
[
edit
]
- Kallis, Aristotle (2000).
Fascist Ideology
. London: Routledge.
ISBN
9780415216128
.
- Paxton, Robert O. (2011).
Europe in the Twentieth Century
. United States: Wadsworth.
ISBN
9781133171126
.
Further reading
[
edit
]
- Bell, P. M. H.
The Origins of the Second World War in Europe
(Routledge, 2014).
- Dowswell, Paul.
The Causes of World War II
(Heinemann, 2002).
- Kagan Robert.
The Ghost at the Feast: America and the Collapse of World Order, 1900-1941
(Knopf, 2023);
excerpt
- Morewood, Steve. "The origins of World War Two in Europe." in
Themes in Modern European History, 1890-1945
(Routledge, 2008) pp. 291-330.
- Overy, Richard J.
The Origins of the Second World War
(Routledge, 2014) . a major scholarly study
- Tarling, Nicholas, and Margaret Lamb.
From Versailles to Pearl Harbor: The Origins of the Second World War in Europe and Asia
(Palgrave Macmillan, 2001)
online
.
- Watt, Donald Cameron.
How War Came: The Immediate Origins of the Second World War, 1938?1939
(1989).
online
a major scholarly study;
online review
- Weinberg, Gerhard L.
A world at arms: A global history of World War II
(Cambridge University Press, 2005).
External links
[
edit
]
|
---|
|
|
|
---|
By scale
| |
---|
By source
| |
---|
By topic
| |
---|
|
|
|
|
By country or region
|
---|
Africa
| |
---|
Americas
|
|
---|
Eurasia
|
|
---|
Oceania
| |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
Organizations, publications
|
---|
|
|
|
|