From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Argument as to whether a good life with a positive legacy necessitates existence of God
The
Atheist's wager
, coined by the philosopher
Michael Martin
and published in his 1990 book
Atheism: A Philosophical Justification
, is an
atheistic
response to
Pascal's wager
regarding the
existence of God
.
[1]
One version of the Atheist's wager suggests that since a kind and loving god would reward good deeds ? and that if no gods exist, good deeds would still leave a positive legacy ? one should live a good life without religion.
[2]
[3]
Another formulation suggests that a god may reward honest disbelief and punish a dishonest belief in the divine.
[4]
Explanation
[
edit
]
Martin's wager states that if one were to analyze their options in regard to how to live their life, they would arrive at the following possibilities:
[2]
[5]
- You may live a good life and believe in a god, and a benevolent god exists, in which case you go to heaven: your gain is infinite.
- You may live a good life without believing in a god, and a benevolent god exists, in which case you go to heaven: your gain is infinite.
- You may live a good life and believe in a god, but no benevolent god exists, in which case you leave a positive legacy to the world; your gain is finite.
- You may live a good life without believing in a god, and no benevolent god exists, in which case you leave a positive legacy to the world; your gain is finite.
- You may live an evil life and believe in a god, and a benevolent god exists, in which case you go to hell: your loss is infinite.
- You may live an evil life without believing in a god, and a benevolent god exists, in which case you go to hell: your loss is infinite.
- You may live an evil life and believe in a god, but no benevolent god exists, in which case you leave a negative legacy to the world; your loss is finite.
- You may live an evil life without believing in a god, and no benevolent god exists, in which case you leave a negative legacy to the world; your loss is finite.
The following table shows the values assigned to each possible outcome:
|
A benevolent god exists
|
No benevolent god exists
|
Belief in god (B)
|
No belief in god (¬B)
|
Belief in god (B)
|
No belief in god (¬B)
|
Good life (L)
|
+∞ (heaven)
|
+∞ (heaven)
|
+X (positive legacy)
|
+X (positive legacy)
|
Evil life (¬L)
|
?∞ (hell)
|
?∞ (hell)
|
?X (negative legacy)
|
?X (negative legacy)
|
Given these values, Martin argues that the option to live a good life clearly
dominates
the option of living an evil life, regardless of belief in a god. Whether one believes in god has no effect on the outcome.
References
[
edit
]