English:
Welcome to the Commons, Vanzanten!
Afrikaans
?|
Alemannisch
?|
asturianu
?|
az?rbaycanca
?|
Bahasa Banjar
?|
catala
?|
?e?tina
?|
Cymraeg
?|
dansk
?|
Deutsch
?|
Deutsch (Sie-Form)?
?|
English
?|
espanol
?|
Esperanto
?|
euskara
?|
estremenu
?|
francais
?|
Frysk
?|
galego
?|
hrvatski
?|
Bahasa Indonesia
?|
interlingua
?|
Interlingue
?|
islenska
?|
italiano
?|
Kiswahili
?|
Kurdi
?|
Latina
?|
lietuvi?
?|
magyar
?|
Bahasa Melayu
?|
Mirandes
?|
Nederlands
?|
norsk bokmal
?|
occitan
?|
Plattduutsch
?|
polski
?|
portugues
?|
portugues do Brasil
?|
roman?
?|
rumantsch
?|
Scots
?|
shqip
?|
sicilianu
?|
sloven?ina
?|
sloven??ina
?|
Basa Sunda
?|
suomi
?|
svenska
?|
Tagalog
?|
Turkce
?|
veneto
?|
Ti?ng Vi?t
?|
Zazaki
?|
Ελληνικ?
?|
беларуская
?|
беларуская (тарашкев?ца)?
?|
български
?|
Ирон
?|
македонски
?|
нохчийн
?|
русский
?|
српски / srpski
?|
то?ик?
?|
укра?нська
?|
???????
?|
???????
?|
??????
?|
???????
?|
?????
?|
??????
?|
???????
?|
?????
?|
?????
?|
??????
?|
?????
?|
???
?|
?????????
?|
??????????
?|
韓國語
?|
日本語
?|
中文
?|
中文(台灣)?
?|
中文(??)?
?|
中文(繁體)?
?|
?語
?|
?????
?|
????
?|
???????
?|
??????
?|
????
?|
?????
?|
+/?
--
SieBot
20:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Dantadd
?
17:44, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Frame from
Seconds From Disaster
(season 1, episode 12, "Tenerife disaster") uploaded as "self work". -
Rojelio
(
talk
)
18:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hallo Vanzanten, ganz herzlichen Dank fur Deine zahlreichen Verbesserungen von Bildern im Bereich Orgel! Das ist ein echter Gewinn und ich freue mich uber die schonen Resultate. Merci fur Deine Muhe und Dein Engagement. Alles Gute, --
Wikiwal
(
talk
)
12:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Ist
File:Bamberg Obere Pfarre Orgel.jpg
hier noch was zu retten, was die Scharfe betrifft? Gruß, --
Wikiwal
(
talk
)
13:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- And could you look at
File:Buren, St Nikolaus 009.JPG
, please? thx, --
Wikiwal
(
talk
)
14:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hallo Vanzanten, bitte nimm bei Verbesserungsversuchen an Bildern die von mir eingestellt wurden vorher mit mir Kontakt auf. Zum einen habe ich die Originale bei mir vorliegen zum anderen bin ich mit deiner Auffassung von besser in den meisten Fallen nicht einverstanden. Du hast eine deutliche Tendenz von einem einigermassen neutralen Farbton die Bilder ins rotliche zu verscheiben, was nicht der Realitat entspricht. Mit freundlichen Grußen --
Jorgens.Mi
Talk
11:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello Vanzanten,
sorry for writing in german, but the last text was in german to, therefore I used my mother tongue.
Please inform me before you make an attempt to improve images uploaded by me. First, I have the originals, second in most cases I have a different opinion of better as you. Your idea of colors is to reddish, which does not correspond to reality.
Sincerely yours --
Jorgens.Mi
Talk
23:04, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
|
File:Sede vacante.jpg
has been listed at
Commons:Deletion requests
so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at
its entry
.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see
Commons:But it's my own work!
for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and ? if appropriate ? contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Fry1989
eh?
00:10, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Additional question: How can be or is Cronholm144 the author of File:Sede vacante.jpg?? Has you
any evidence
(reference) for this? Thanks.
--
Π?Ρ
?ΛΙΟ
?
16:07, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Thanks for answer. It seams your retouching was only a cleaning and stretching!? I found (in google) a concrete version of this
from 2009
, but not a really source. PS. I'm sorry to said insinuate you have " willful false" given information.
--
Π?Ρ
?ΛΙΟ
?
13:09, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hi Vanzanten, did you colorize the original b/w photo or did you upload a native color photo? --
Turelio
(
talk
)
18:37, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
[
reply
]
SAme question for
File:Giuseppe Siri, 1944.jpg
. --
Turelio
(
talk
)
18:39, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Masur
(
talk
)
18:36, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
[
reply
]
If you have any corrections to images start by asking their author. Thank you. --
Archaeodontosaurus
(
talk
)
06:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Could you help here, please? It's a little bit dark... --
Wikiwal
(
talk
)
12:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- And also this one?:
File:Evangelische Kirche Villingen (Hungen) 08.JPG
. The author
Cherubino
does agree with reworking it. Thanx, --
Wikiwal
(
talk
)
15:53, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
[
reply
]
|
File:Filiberto di Savoia-Genova.jpg
has been listed at
Commons:Deletion requests
so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at
its entry
.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see
Commons:But it's my own work!
for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and ? if appropriate ? contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Ju
Ta
17:56, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
[
reply
]
I would like to use this picture on the back cover of a book I am writing. My Publisher requires at least an email indicating that you are the owner and give permission to use the image for a book. This is required in spite of the permissions given at Wikimedia commons. Can you send me an email stating such?
email is wayward51@outlook.com.
Thanks
Dave
Hallo Vanzanten, could you look at this one?
File:Oybin 0005.jpg
A litte bit dark. Thanx, --
Wikiwal
(
talk
)
12:27, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
[
reply
]
|
File:Audrey Hepburn black and white.jpg
has been listed at
Commons:Deletion requests
so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at
its entry
.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see
Commons:But it's my own work!
for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and ? if appropriate ? contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
???
Chris Woodrich
(
talk
)
23:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
[
reply
]
|
File:Jim Morrison 1968.jpg
has been listed at
Commons:Deletion requests
so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at
its entry
.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see
Commons:But it's my own work!
for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and ? if appropriate ? contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Kaldari
(
talk
)
18:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
[
reply
]
|
File:Jim Morrison 1968.jpg
has been listed at
Commons:Deletion requests
so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at
its entry
.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see
Commons:But it's my own work!
for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and ? if appropriate ? contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Kaldari
(
talk
)
21:41, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
[
reply
]
|
File:Nave organ and stained glass windows of Strasbourg Cathedral - 3.jpg
has been listed at
Commons:Deletion requests
so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at
its entry
.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see
Commons:But it's my own work!
for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and ? if appropriate ? contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
95.130.162.196
14:44, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
[
reply
]
?
LX
(
talk
,
contribs
)
14:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
[
reply
]
|
File:Ziffernblatt astronomische uhr marienkirche rostock.jpg
has been listed at
Commons:Deletion requests
so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at
its entry
.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see
Commons:But it's my own work!
for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and ? if appropriate ? contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
?
LX
(
talk
,
contribs
)
18:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
[
reply
]
|
File:RoskildeDomkirke-MindreOrgel.jpg
has been listed at
Commons:Deletion requests
so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at
its entry
.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see
Commons:But it's my own work!
for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and ? if appropriate ? contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
KDLarsen
(
talk
)
11:16, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]
|
File:Eucharistic Miracle of Lanciano - public documentation - commissione medica OMS-ONU.JPG
has been listed at
Commons:Deletion requests
so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at
its entry
.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see
Commons:But it's my own work!
for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and ? if appropriate ? contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Alpaga2
(
talk
)
08:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]