|
File:Flag of Kazakhstan (1992).svg
has been listed at
Commons:Deletion requests
so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at
its entry
.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see
Commons:But it's my own work!
for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and ? if appropriate ? contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Fry1989
eh?
20:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Malarz, questo documento ti mostra lo stemma ufficiale del Friuli-Venezia Giulia. E un "allegato" dalle legge.
http://lexview-int.regione.fvg.it/FontiNormative/Regolamenti/D_P_REG_0199-2006_All_B_01.pdf
La legge per l'uso dei simboli e qui:
http://lexview-int.regione.fvg.it/FontiNormative/Regolamenti/D_P_REG_0199-2006.pdf
Occorre accordare i colori di "Flag of Friuli-Venezia Giulia.jpg" alla rappresentazione ufficiale.
74.67.21.142
05:12, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- FYI, I have nominated
File:Regione-Friuli-Venezia Giulia-Stemma.jpg
for deletion, which I believe would also affect your file. I don't speak Italian to follow the above IP's sources well enough to know if they would change anything.
VernoWhitney
(
talk
)
01:21, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
[
reply
]
|
File:Flag of Oman (bordered).svg
has been listed at
Commons:Deletion requests
so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at
its entry
.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see
Commons:But it's my own work!
for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and ? if appropriate ? contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Metronomo
(
talk
)
04:13, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
[
reply
]
bahasa melayu
?
catala
?
?e?tina
?
dansk
?
deutsch (Sie-Form)
?
deutsch
?
english
?
espanol
?
francais
?
galego
?
hrvatski
?
italiano
?
magyar
?
nederlands
?
norsk
?
norsk bokmal
?
norsk nynorsk
?
portugues
?
polski
?
portugues do Brasil
?
roman?
?
sicilianu
?
sloven?ina
?
sloven??ina
?
suomi
?
svenska
?
turkce
?
беларуская
?
беларуская (тарашкев?ца)
?
български
?
македонски
?
русский
?
укра?нська
?
?????
?
????
?
??????
?
韓國語
?
日本語
?
中文(??)
?
中文(繁體)
?
?????
?
?????????
?
?????
?
+/?
|
|
This media may be
deleted
.
|
Thanks for uploading
File:Doomsday Clock graph pl.svg
. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the
copyright
status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid
copyright tag
. For example, you can tag it with {{
self
|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license
GFDL
plus
Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license
or you can tag it with
{{PD-self}}
to release it into
the public domain
. (See
Commons:Copyright tags
for the full list of license tags that you can use.)
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a
derivative
of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you
must
obtain permission through the
VRT
system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in
criteria for deletion
. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at
Commons:Village pump/Copyright
or see
our help pages
. Thank you.
|
Ju
Ta
11:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Witaj. Mam pytanie. Czy jest jakie? narz?dzie do sprawdzania jakie nowe pliki ostatnio dodano do wybranej kategorii na commons? Tak ?eby zeskanowało te? wszystkie podkategorie umieszczone w tej kategorii. Pozdrawiam. Chodzi mi konkretnie o
t? kategori?
. Dzi?ki.
Arewicz
(
talk
)
00:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Sorry, I have uploaded a new version. This was a mistake. You can delete it.--
Anarabert
(
talk
)
02:01, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Hi Malarz pl,
Were was the discussion held that concluded
File:Flag of the Isle of Man.svg
should be superseded by
File:Flag of the Isle of Mann.svg
? The discussion that I am aware of
File talk:Flag of the Isle of Man.svg
was concluded in favour of the version with the triskelion slightly more down, but then the second version was created and now somehow has superseded the first? -
FakirNL
(
talk
)
11:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
[
reply
]
You should notificate
@
Ruthven
:
because that version has been made by him. --
Gambo7
(
talk
)
19:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
[
reply
]
Please read
File talk:Flag of the Vatican City.svg#Do not change this redirect!
before doing any more edit regarding the Vatican City flag. Thanks.
Veverve
(
talk
)
16:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
[
reply
]