Bureaucratic. Ineffective. Undemocratic. Anti-United States. And after the bitter debate over the use of force in Iraq, critics might add ?useless? to the list of adjectives describing the United Nations. So why was the United Nations the first place the Bush administration went for approval after winning the war? Because for $1.25 billion a year?roughly what the Pentagon spends every 32 hours?the United Nations is still the best investment that the world can make in stopping AIDS and SARS, feeding the poor, helping refugees, and fighting global crime and the spread of nuclear weapons.
"The United Nations Has Become Irrelevant"
No.
The second Gulf War battered
the U.N. Security Council's already shaky prestige. Hawks condemned the council
for failing to bless the war; opponents for failing to block it. Nevertheless,
when major combat stopped, the United States and Great Britain rushed to seek
council authorization for their joint occupation of Iraq, the lifting of sanctions,
and the right to market Iraqi oil.
What lessons will emerge from the wrangle over Iraq? Will France, Russia, and
China grudgingly concede U.S. dominance and cooperate sufficiently to keep the
United States from routinely bypassing the Security Council? Or might they form
an opposition bloc that paralyzes the body? Will the United States and United
Kingdom proceed triumphantly? Or will they suffer so many headaches in Iraq
that they conclude, in hindsight, that initiating the war without council support
was a mistake?
Both sides have reason to move toward cooperation. The French, Russians, and
Chinese all derive outsized influence from their status as permanent Security
Council members; they see the panel as a means to mitigate U.S. hegemony and
do not want the White House to pronounce it dead. And despite their unilateralist
tendencies, Bush administration officials will welcome council support when
battling terrorists and rogue states in the future. Although the council is
not and never has been the preeminent arbiter of war and peace that its supporters
wish it were, it remains the most widely accepted source of international legitimacyand
legitimacy still has meaning, even for empires. That is why U.S. President George
W. Bush and U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell both made their major prewar,
pro-war presentations before a U.N. audience.
Beyond the council itself, the United Nations' ongoing relevance is evident
in the work of the more than two dozen organizations comprising the U.N. system.
In 2003 alone, the International Atomic Energy Agency reported that Iran had
processed nuclear materials in violation of its Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty
obligations; the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia tried
deposed Yugoslav leader Slobodan Milosevic for genocide; and the World Health
Organization successfully coordinated the global response to severe acute respiratory
syndrome (SARS). Meanwhile, the World Food Programme has fed more than 70 million
people annually for the last five years; the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees
maintains a lifeline to the international homeless; the U.N. Children's Fund
has launched a campaign to end forced childhood marriage; the Joint U.N. Programme
on HIV/AIDS remains a focal point for global efforts to defeat HIV/AIDS; and
the U.N. Population Fund helps families plan, mothers survive, and children
grow up healthy in the most impoverished places on earth. The United Nations
may seem useless to the self-satisfied, narrow-minded, and micro-hearted minority,
but to most of the world's population, it remains highly relevant indeed.
"Relations Between the United States and the United Nations Are at an
All-Time Low"
Not even close.
One day before
the U.N. General Assembly convened in 1952, Republican Sen. Joseph McCarthy
of Wisconsin began hearings in New York on the loyalty of U.S. citizens employed
by the United Nations. A federal grand jury then opened a competing inquiry
in the same city on the same subject. (Some U.N. employees called to testify
even invoked their constitutional right against self-incrimination.) The furor
generated massive indignation and mutual U.S.-U.N. distrust. J.B. Mathews, chief
investigator for the House Un-American Activities Committee, declared that the
United Nations "could not be less of a cruel hoax if it had been organized
in Hell for the sole purpose of aiding and abetting the destruction of the United
States."
East-West and North-South tensions transformed the General Assembly into hostile
territory through much of the 1970s and 1980s. U.S. ambassadors such as Daniel
P. Moynihan and Jeane Kirkpatrick earned combat pay rebutting the verbal pyrotechnics
of delegates in the throes of anti-Semitic passions and Marxist moonbeams. The
low point was the passage in 1975 of a resolution equating Zionism with racism.
In the 1990s, supporters of the Contract With America, led by Republican Rep.
Newt Gingrich of Georgia, lambasted U.N. peacekeeping, blocked payment of U.N.
dues, and ridiculed U.N. programs. Similarly, Republican Sen. Jesse Helms of
North Carolina spoke for many of the far-right-minded but wrong-headed when
he termed the United Nations "the nemesis of millions of Americans."
Today, according to the Pew Global Attitudes Project, U.S. citizens consider
U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan the fourth most respected world leader (trailing,
in order, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, U.S. President George W. Bush,
and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon). The United States has paid back most
of its acknowledged U.N. arrears. The United Nations' agenda and core U.S. security
interests have gradually converged. For example, the U.N. Charter says nothing
about the importance of elected government, yet U.N. missions routinely sponsor
democratic transitions, monitor elections, and promote free institutions. The
charter explicitly prohibits U.N. intervention in the internal affairs of any
government (save for enforcement actions), yet the U.N. High Commissioner for
Human Rights, created in 1993 at the United States' urging, exists solely to
nudge governments to do the right thing by their own people. The United Nations'
founders never mentioned terrorism, yet today the United Nations encourages
governments to ratify antiterrorist conventions, freeze terrorist assets, and
tighten security on land, in air, and at sea. Polls continue to show that a
significant majority of U.S. citizens believe the United States should seek
U.N. authorization before using force and should cooperate with other nations
through the world body.