???????????? ?????? ????????????????: ???????? ??????????' ???????????????? ???????? ?????????? ?????? ????????????
In a landmark verdict, the jury in the
Epic Games
vs.
Google
trial has declared Google's Play Store and billing practices an 'illegal monopoly’ yesterday.
?????????????????????????? ??????????'?? ??????????????
? Clear Rules from the Start:
Apple
established a clear, albeit closed, ecosystem that users and developers willingly join, accepting its restrictions.
? Security and Trust:
Apple
’s stringent control over its App Store has been argued to protect users and enhance trust, despite higher costs for developers.
? A Consistent Standpoint:
Apple
’s argument that its policies are a part of its product offering was accepted, positioning them as protectors of a secure ecosystem.
?????????????????????? ????????????'?? ????????????
? Promises vs. Practices:
Google
’s initial stance on openness clashed with later actions to lock down the Play Store and billing, leading to charges of deceptive practices.
? Contractual Tightening: Evidence suggested
Google
restricted choices for OEMs and consumers, which contradicted the ethos of Android’s original market proposition.
? Jury's Verdict: The unanimous decision against
Google
highlighted issues with competition and choice, branding
Google
’s control as an 'illegal monopoly.'
As we await the appeal and the unfolding implications, this verdict invites us to reflect on the balance of power in digital marketplaces. The verdicts bring consumer choice and informed decision-making to the forefront, with possible long-term effects on how tech products are marketed and sold.
PC: @PlaygroundAI
#AppleVsEpic
#GoogleVsEpic
#DigitalEconomy
#Antitrust
#MarketCompetition
#ConsumerChoice
