From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This template is within the scope of
WikiProject Engineering
, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
engineering
on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion
and see a list of open tasks.
Engineering
Wikipedia:WikiProject Engineering
Template:WikiProject Engineering
Engineering articles
| | Template
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment
scale.
|
|
The template was grouped by
but I changed it to say
- 1 to 9999
- 10000 to 19999
- 20000+
It looks a little uglier but it is more correct.
Jason Quinn
(
talk
) 20:13, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- There may be some merit in splitting the numbers up the same was as in the
List of International Organization for Standardization standards
article, for the sake of consistency, ie:
- 1-999
- 1000-9999
- 10000-19999
- 20000-29999
- 30000-39999
- 40000+ (This doesn't match the article, which only has 80000)
- Mitch Ames
(
talk
) 04:39, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
[
reply
]
I am writing several articles on project management as part of the
ASCE
Body of Knowledge project
( or ASCE BoK) as well as the
Project Management Institute
Body of Knowledge project
( or PM BoK). ISO cites and parallels a lot of the materials....
Thanks ...
Risk Engineer
(
talk
) 17:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
[
reply
]
| This
edit request
has been answered. Set the
|answered=
or
|ans=
parameter to
no
to reactivate your request.
|
Include ISO 26262 Standard in the list (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_26262
)
Cynosure1
(
talk
) 23:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done
?
Jonesey95
(
talk
) 07:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
[
reply
]
| This
edit request
has been answered. Set the
|answered=
or
|ans=
parameter to
no
to reactivate your request.
|
Can we get 14496-10 updated for
WP:BRINT
? The article seems to have been renamed. It should link directly to
Advanced Video Coding
(avoiding the
H.264/MPEG-4 AVC
redirect). Thank you.
50.53.23.14
(
talk
) 15:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done
??????????????????????????????????
(
????????
) 22:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- @
1234qwer1234qwer4
:
Thank you.
50.53.23.14
(
talk
) 23:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
[
reply
]
| This
edit request
has been answered. Set the
|answered=
or
|ans=
parameter to
no
to reactivate your request.
|
Can we get 23090-3 added? It should link to
Versatile Video Coding
. This can be seen at
MPEG-I ? MPEG
. Thank you.
50.53.23.14
(
talk
) 15:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- The page you linked does not mention the standard, so I don't know if this should be done yet.
??????????????????????????????????
(
????????
) 22:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- @
1234qwer1234qwer4
:
Well if you won't take that one how about this one which certainly means it is published ("Stage: 60.00 (Under publication)" as of 2021-01-20):
https://www.iso.org/standard/73022.html
50.53.23.14
(
talk
) 22:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
[
reply
]
- Done
??????????????????????????????????
(
????????
) 12:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
[
reply
]